×

Re-examination of the different origins of the arithmetical books of Euclid’s Elements. (English) Zbl 1428.01007

Research has shown that some propositions of Euclid’s Elements, especially at the ends of certain books, may have been added to the text after its original composition. The author asserts that Book VII on arithmetic may be an example of this phenomenon. An unusual diagram in VII.28 leads to the hypothesis that VII.29–39 might be additions as well; this is verified by observations of differences in linguistic style and of the logical relations between propositions. This evidence is circumstantial, and the author leaves open the possibility that these differences may have existed already at Euclid’s time; but he argues successfully that the view of Book VII as a unified treatise needs to be re-examined.

MSC:

01A20 History of Greek and Roman mathematics
11-03 History of number theory
11A41 Primes
11A51 Factorization; primality

Keywords:

Elements; arithmetic

Biographic References:

Euclid

Software:

DRaFT
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] (Acerbi, F., Euclide. Tutte le opere (2007), Bompiani)
[2] August, E. F., Euclidis Elementa ex potimis libris in usum tironum. 2 vols (1829), Trautwein
[3] Busard, H., The Latin Translation of the Arabic Version of Euclid’s Elements Commonly Ascribed to Gerard of Cremona (1984), Brill · Zbl 1116.01302
[4] (Frajese, A.; Maccioni, L., Gli Elementi di Euclide (1970), UTET)
[5] Heath, T. L., The Thirteen Books of the Elements, vol. 3 (1925), Cambridge University Press
[6] Heiberg, J. L.; Menge, H., Euclidis opera omnia, 8 vols (1916), Teubner · JFM 15.0002.04
[7] Heiberg, J. L.; Stamatis, E. S., Euclidis Elementa, 5 vols (1977), Teubner
[8] Itard, J., Les livres arithmétiques d’Euclide (1961), Hermann · Zbl 0117.00502
[9] Knorr, W. R., The Evolution of the Euclidean Elements (1975), Reidel
[10] Knorr, W. R., The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems (1986), Birkhäuser
[11] Knorr, W. R., Textual Studies in Ancient and Medieval Geometry (1989), Birkhäuser · Zbl 0684.01002
[12] Knorr, W. R., The wrong text of Euclid: on Heiberg’s text and its alternatives, Centaurus, 38, 208-276 (1996) · Zbl 0861.01014
[13] Mueller, I., Philosophy of Mathematics and Deductive Structure in Euclid’s Elements (1981), The MIT Press · Zbl 0582.01003
[14] Netz, R., The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive History (1999), Cambridge University Press · Zbl 1025.01002
[15] Neuenschwander, E., Die ersten vier Bücher der Elemente Euklids, Arch. Hist. Exact Sci., 9, 325-380 (1973) · Zbl 0263.01007
[16] Saito, K., Diagrams in arithmetical books of Euclid’s Elements, SCIAMVS, 19, 103-166 (2018) · Zbl 1459.01007
[17] Saito, K.; Sidoli, N., Diagrams and arguments in ancient Greek mathematics: lessons drawn from comparisons of the manuscript diagrams with those in modern critical editions, (Chemla, K., The History of Mathematical Proof in Ancient Traditions (2012), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge), 135-162 · Zbl 1268.01002
[18] Taisbak, C. M., Division and Logos: A Theory of Equivalent Couples and Sets of Integers Propounded by Euclid in the Arithmetical Books of the Elements (1971), Odense University Press · Zbl 0334.01006
[19] van der Waerden, B. L., Die Arithmetik der Pythagoreer. I, Math. Ann., 120, 127-153 (1947/1949) · Zbl 0030.09801
[20] Vitrac, B., Les Éléments, 4 vols (2001), Presse Universitaires de France
[21] Vitrac, B., The Euclidean ideal of proof in the Elements and philological uncertainties of Heiberg’s edition of the text, (Chemla, K., The History of Mathematical Proof in Ancient Traditions (2012), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge), 69-134 · Zbl 1267.01007
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.