zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Resistance may be futile: dispersal scales and selection for disease resistance in competing plants. (English) Zbl 07197035
Summary: If a host species shares a pathogen with competing species, the disease may provide a net benefit. Selection for resistance will depend on the trade-off between the damage done by the disease and the positive effects resulting from infection of competitors. This paper presents a simple, spatially explicit model of a plant that shares a disease with a superior competitor. The phenotypic evolution of cost-free resistance is studied by using the method of pair approximation to analyse the small-scale spatial structure of the interacting populations. Selection favors lower resistance when disease transmission is spatially local and the damage to the competitor is sufficient to outweigh the direct effects of infection. This suggests that local spatial structure may be critical in determining the coevolution of host-host-pathogen systems.

92D15 Problems related to evolution
92C80 Plant biology
Full Text: DOI
[1] Alexander, H. M.; Holt, R. D., The interaction between plant competition and disease, Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst., 1, 206-220 (1998)
[2] Antonovics, J.; Thrall, P., The cost of resistance and the maintenance of genetic polymorphism in host-pathogen systems, Proc. R. Soc. London B, 257, 105-110 (1994)
[3] Begon, M.; Bowers, R., Beyond host-pathogen dynamics, (Grenfell, B. T.; Dobson, A. P., Ecology of Infectious Diseases in Natural Populations (1995), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge)
[4] Boots, M.; Bowers, R., Three mechanisms of host resistance to microparasites—avoidance, recovery and tolerance—show different evolutionary dynamics, J. Theor. Biol., 201, 13-23 (1999), doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.1009
[5] Boots, M.; Haraguchi, Y., The evolution of costly resistance in host-parasite systems, Am. Nat., 153, 359-370 (1999)
[6] Boots, M.; Sasaki, A., The evolutionary dynamics of local infection and global reproduction in host-parasite interactions, Ecol. Lett., 3, 181-185 (2000)
[7] Bowers, R.; Boots, M.; Begon, M., Life-history trade-offs and the evolution of pathogen resistancecompetition between host strains, Proc. R. Soc. London B, 257, 247-253 (1994)
[8] Burdon, J., Diseases and Plant Population Biology (1987), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge
[9] Burdon, J.; Thrall, P., Spatial and temporal patterns in coevolving plant and pathogen associations, Am. Nat., 153, S15-S33 (1999)
[10] Clay, K., The impact of parasitic and mutualistic fungi on competitive interactions among plants, (Grace, J. B.; Tilman, D., Perspectives on Plant Competition (1990), Academic Press: Academic Press San Diego)
[11] Connell, J., On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competitionevidence from field experiments, Am. Nat., 122, 661-696 (1983)
[12] Connell, J., Apparent versus “real” competition in plants, (Grace, J. B.; Tilman, D., Perspectives on Plant Competition (1990), Academic Press: Academic Press San Diego)
[13] Damgaard, C., Coevolution of a plant host-pathogen gene-for-gene system in a metapopulation model without cost of resistance or cost of virulence, J. Theor. Biol., 201, 1-12 (1999), doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.1007
[14] Dawkins, R.; Krebs, J., Arms race between and within species, Proc. R. Soc. London B, 205, 489-511 (1979)
[15] Ellis, J.; Dodds, P.; Pryor, T., Structure, function and evolution of plant disease resistance genes, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 3, 278-284 (2000)
[16] Gibson, C.; Watkinson, A., Host selectivity and the mediation of competition by the root hemiparasite Rhinanthus minor, Oecologia, 86, 81-87 (1991)
[17] Grosholz, E., Interactions of intraspecific, interspecific, and apparent competition with host-pathogen dynamics, Ecology, 73, 507-514 (1992)
[18] Keeling, M.; Grenfell, B., Individual-based perspectives on \(R_0\), J. Theor. Biol., 203, 51-61 (2000), doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.1064
[19] Keeling, M.; Rand, D.; Morris, A., Correlation models for childhood diseases, Proc. R. Soc. London B, 264, 1149-1156 (1997)
[20] Marvier, M., Parasite impacts on host communitiesplant parasitism in a California coastal prairie, Ecology, 79, 2616-2623 (1998)
[21] Matsuda, H.; Ogita, N.; Sasaki, A.; Sato, K., Statistical mechanics of population, Prog. Theor. Phys., 88, 1035-1049 (1992)
[22] Matthies, D., Interactions between the root hemiparasite Melampyrum arvense and mixtures of host plantsheterotrophic benefit and parasite-mediated competition, Oikos, 75, 118-124 (1996)
[23] McIntosh, R.; Watson, I., Genetics of host-pathogen interactions in rusts, (Scott, K.; Chakravorty, A., The Rust Fungi (1982), Academic Press: Academic Press London)
[24] Mitchell-Olds, T.; Bergelson, J., Biotic interactionsgenomics and coevolution, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 3, 273-277 (2000)
[25] Moran, N., The ubiquitous and varied role of infection in the lives of animals and plants, Am. Nat., 160, Suppl., S1-S8 (2002)
[26] Park, T., Experimental studies of interspecific competition. I. Competition between populations of the flour beetles Tribolium cofusum Duval and Tribolium castaneum Herbst, Ecol. Monogr., 18, 267-307 (1948)
[27] Price, P.; Westoby, M.; Rice, B.; Atsatt, P.; Fritz, R.; Thompson, J.; Mobley, K., Parasite mediation in ecological interactions, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 17, 487-505 (1986)
[28] Price, P.; Westoby, M.; Rice, B., Parasite-mediated competitionsome predictions and tests, Am. Nat., 131, 544-555 (1988)
[29] Purrington, C., Costs of resistance, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 3, 305-308 (2000)
[30] Rand, D., Correlation equations and pair approximations for spatial ecologies, (McGlade, J., Advanced Ecological Theory: Principles and Applications (1999), Blackwell Science: Blackwell Science Malden, MA)
[31] Rand, D.; Wilson, H.; McGlade, J., Dynamics and evolutionevolutionarily stable attractors, invasion exponents and phenotype dynamics, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B, 343, 261-283 (1994)
[32] Rand, D.; Keeling, M.; Wilson, H., Invasion, stability and evolution to criticality in spatially extended, artificial host-pathogen ecologies, Proc. R. Soc. London B, 259, 55-63 (1995)
[33] Rice, B.; Westoby, M., Heteroecious rusts as agents of interference competition, Evol. Theory, 6, 43-52 (1982)
[34] Richter, T.; Ronald, P., The evolution of disease resistance genes, Plant Mol. Biol., 42, 195-204 (2000)
[35] Rizzo, D.; Slaughter, G.; Parmeter, J., Enlargement of canopy gaps associated with a fungal pathogen in Yosemite Valley, California, Can. J. For. Res., 30, 1501-1510 (2000)
[36] Sato, K.; Matsuda, H.; Sasaki, A., Pathogen invasion and host extinction in lattice structured populations, J. Math. Biol., 32, 251-268 (1994)
[37] Stahl, E.; Bishop, J., Plant-pathogen arms races at the molecular level, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 3, 299-304 (2000)
[38] Stahl, E.; Dwyer, G.; Mauricio, R.; Kreitman, M.; Bergelson, J., Dynamics of disease resistance polymorphism at the Rpm1 locus of Arabidopsis, Nature, 400, 667-671 (1999)
[39] Strauss, S.; Siemens, D.; Decher, M.; Mitchell-Olds, T., Ecological costs of plant resistance to herbivores in the currency of pollination, Evolution, 53, 1105-1113 (1999)
[40] Tainter, F.; Baker, F., Principles of Forest Pathology (1996), Wiley: Wiley New York
[41] Takken, F.; Joosten, M., Plant resistance genestheir structure, function and evolution, Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 106, 699-713 (2000)
[42] van Baalen, M.; Rand, D., The unit of selection in viscous populations and the evolution of altruism, J. Theor. Biol., 193, 631-648 (1998), doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0730
[43] Yan, G., Parasite-mediated competitiona model of directly transmitted macroparasites, Am. Nat., 148, 1089-1112 (1996)
[44] Zuk, M.; Stoehr, A., Immune defense and host life history, Am. Nat., 160, Suppl., S9-S22 (2002)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.