×

Fuzzy logic and neural network applications to fault diagnosis. (English) Zbl 0956.68523

Summary: This contribution gives a survey on the state of the art in artificial intelligence applications to model-based diagnosis for dynamic processes. Emphasis is placed on residual generation and residual evaluation employing fuzzy logic. Particularly for residual generation, a novel observer concept, the so-called knowledge observer, is introduced. An artificial neural network approach for residual generation and evaluation is outlined as well.

MSC:

68T05 Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence
68T30 Knowledge representation
68T35 Theory of languages and software systems (knowledge-based systems, expert systems, etc.) for artificial intelligence
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Willsky, A. S., A survey of design methods for failure detection in dynamic systems, Automatica, 12, 601-611 (1976) · Zbl 0345.93067
[2] Gertler, J., Analytical redundance methods in fault detection and isolation, (Proceedings of the IFAC/IMACS Symposium SAFEPROCESS. Proceedings of the IFAC/IMACS Symposium SAFEPROCESS, Baden-Baden (1991)), 9-21
[3] Frank, P. M., Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundance—a survey and some new results, Automatica, 26, 459-474 (1990) · Zbl 0713.93052
[4] Frank, P. M., Quantitative and qualitative model-based fault diagnosis—a survey and some new results, European J. Control, 2, 1, 6-28 (1996) · Zbl 0857.93015
[5] Patton, R. J., Robustness issues in fault-tolerant control, (TOOLDIAG ’93 International Conference on Fault Diagnosis. TOOLDIAG ’93 International Conference on Fault Diagnosis, Toulouse (1993))
[6] Isermann, R., Fault diagnosis of machines via parameter estimation and knowledge processing, Automatica, 29, 815-836 (1993) · Zbl 0800.93155
[7] (Patton, R. J.; Frank, P. M.; Clark, R. N., Fault Diagnosis in Dynamic Systems, Theory and Application (1990), Prentice-Hall)
[8] Milne, R., Strategies for diagnosis, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet., SMC-17, 333-339 (1987)
[9] Scarl, E., Diagnosis and sensor validation through knowledge of structure and function, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet., 17, 360-369 (1987)
[10] Dvorak, D.; Kuipers, B. J., Model-based monitoring of dynamic systems, (Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2 (1989)), Detroit · Zbl 0718.68078
[11] Isermann, R., Wissensbasierte Fehlerdiagnose technicher Prozesse, at-Automatisierungstechnik, 36 (1988), Jahrgang, Heft 11 · Zbl 0669.93067
[12] Himmelblau, D. M., Use of artificial neural networks to monitor faults and for troubleshooting in the process industries, (IFAC Symposium, On-line Fault Detection and Supervision in the Chemical Process Industry. IFAC Symposium, On-line Fault Detection and Supervision in the Chemical Process Industry, Newark, Del. (1992))
[13] Gertler, J., An evidential reasoning extension to quantitative model-based failure diagnosis, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet., 22, 275-289 (1992)
[14] Kiupel, N.; Frank, P. M., Process supervision with the aid of fuzzy logic, (IEEE/SMC Conference. IEEE/SMC Conference, Le Touquet, France (1993)), presented at
[15] Ulieru, M.; Isermann, R., Design of a fuzzy logic based diagnostic model for technical processes, (Proceedings of the International ’92 ASME Conference Fuzzy Signals and Systems. Proceedings of the International ’92 ASME Conference Fuzzy Signals and Systems, Geneva (1992))
[16] Davis, R., Diagnostic reasoning based on structure and behavior, Artificial Intelligence, 24, 347-410 (1984)
[17] Genesereth, M. R., The use of design descriptions in automated diagnosis, Artificial Intelligence, 24, 411-436 (1984)
[18] de Kleer, I.; Williams, B. C., Diagnosing multiple faults, Artificial Intelligence, 32, 97-130 (1987) · Zbl 0642.94045
[19] Reiter, R., A theory of diagnosis from first principles, Artificial Intelligence, 32, 57-95 (1987) · Zbl 0643.68122
[20] Forbus, K. D., Qualitative process theory, Artificial Intelligence, 24, 85-168 (1984)
[21] de Kleer, I.; Brown, J. S., A qualitative physics based on confluences, Artificial Intelligence, 24, 7-83 (1984)
[22] Kuipers, B., Common sense reasoning about causality: Deriving behavior from structure, Artificial Intelligence, 24, 169-204 (1984)
[23] Kuipers, B., Qualitative simulation, Artificial Intelligence, 29, 289-338 (1986) · Zbl 0624.68098
[24] Forbus, K. D., Interpreting measurements of physical systems, (Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-86) (1986)), 113-117
[25] Kuipers, B., Qualitative simulation as causal explanation, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet., 17, 3, 432-444 (1987)
[26] Leitch, R. R.; Shen, Q.; Coghil, G.; Chantler, M.; Slater, A., Qualitative model-based diagnosis of dynamic systems, (Colloquium of the Institution of Measurement and Control. Colloquium of the Institution of Measurement and Control, London (1994))
[27] Ng, H. T., Model-based, multiple fault diagnosis of time-varing, continuous physical devices, (Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on AI Applications. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on AI Applications, Santa Barbara, Calif. (1990)), 9-15
[28] Oyeleye, O. O.; Finch, F. E.; Kramer, M. A., Qualitative modeling and fault diagnosis of dynamic processes by midas, Chem. Engrg. Comm., 96, 205-228 (1990)
[29] Terpstra, V. J.; Verbruggen, H. B.; Hoogland, M. W.; Ficke, R. A.E., A real-time, fuzzy, deep-knowledge based fault-diagnosis system for CSTR, (IFAC Symposium On-line Fault Detection in Chemical Process Industries. IFAC Symposium On-line Fault Detection in Chemical Process Industries, Newark, Del. (1992))
[30] Berleant, D.; Kuipers, B., Qualitative-numeric simulation with Q3, (Faulting, B.; Strass, P., Recent Advances in Qualitative Physics (1992), MIT Press), 3-16
[31] Shen, Q.; Leitch, R., Fuzzy qualitative simulation, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet., 23, 4, 1038-1064 (1993)
[32] Leitch, R. R.; Shen, Q., Prioritising behaviour in qualitative simulation, (13th International Joint Conference on AI (1993))
[33] Shen, Q.; Leitch, R., Application studies of fuzzy qualitative simulation, (Borne, P.; Tzafestas, S. G., Mathematics of the Analysis and Design of Process Control (1992))
[34] Ulieru, M., A fuzzy-logic based computer assisted fault diagnosis systems, (TOOLDIAG ’93. TOOLDIAG ’93, Toulouse (1993))
[35] Jen Chang, S.; Di Cesare, F.; Goldbogen, G., Failure propagation trees for diagnosis in manufacturing systems, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet., 21, 767-776 (1991)
[36] Dubuisson, B., Diagnostic et Reconnaissances de Formes (1990), Hermes: Hermes Paris
[37] Frélicot, C., Un systéme adaptif de diagnostic par reconnaissance des formes floue, (Thèse (1992), Univ. de Technologie de Compiègne)
[38] Montmain, J.; Gentil, S., Decision-making in fault detection: A fuzzy approach, (TOOLDIAG ’93, International Conference on Fault Diagnosis. TOOLDIAG ’93, International Conference on Fault Diagnosis, Toulouse (1993))
[39] Sauter, D.; Dubois, G.; Levrat, E.; Brémont, J., Fault diagnosis in systems using fuzzy logic, (EUFIT ’93, Proceedings of the First European Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Technologies. EUFIT ’93, Proceedings of the First European Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Technologies, Aachen (1993))
[40] Schneider, H., Implementation of a fuzzy concept for supervision and fault detection of robots, (EUFIT ’93, Proceedings of the First European Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Technologies. EUFIT ’93, Proceedings of the First European Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Technologies, Aachen (1993)), 775-780
[41] Himmelblau, D. M.; Braker, R. W.; Suewatanakul, W., Fault classification with the aid of artificial neural networks, (IFAC/IMACS-Symposium Safeprocess ’91. IFAC/IMACS-Symposium Safeprocess ’91, Baden-Baden (Sept. 10-13, 1991)), 369-373
[42] Sorsa, T.; Suontausta, J.; Koivo, H. N., Dynamic fault diagnosis using radial basis function networks, (TOOLDIAG’93. TOOLDIAG’93, Toulouse (1993))
[43] Tzafestas, S. G.; Dalianis, P. J., Fault diagnosis in complex systems using artificial neural networks, (The Third IEEE Conference on Control Application. The Third IEEE Conference on Control Application, Glasgow (1994)), 877-882
[44] Hoskins, J. C.; Kaliyur, K. M.; Himmelblau, D. M., Fault diagnosis in complex chemical plants using artificial neural networks, AIChE J., 37, 137-142 (1991)
[45] Köppen-Seliger, B.; Frank, P. M., Fault detection and isolation in technical processes with neural networks, (Conference on Decision and Control CDC’95. Conference on Decision and Control CDC’95, New Orleans (1995)) · Zbl 0992.93004
[46] Sorsa, T.; Koivo, H. N., Application of artificial neural networks in process fault diagnosis, (IFAC/IMACS—Symposium on Fault Detection Supervision and Safety for Technical Processes Safeprocess ’91. IFAC/IMACS—Symposium on Fault Detection Supervision and Safety for Technical Processes Safeprocess ’91, Baden-Baden (1991)) · Zbl 0800.93021
[47] Köppen-Seliger, B.; Frank, P. M.; Wolff, A., Residual evaluation for fault detection and isolation with RCE neural networks, (Proceedings of the American Control Conference ACC’95. Proceedings of the American Control Conference ACC’95, Seattle (1995)), 3264-3268
[48] Polycarpou, M. M.; Vemuri, A. T., Learning methodology for failure detection and accommodation, IEEE Control Systems, 15, 3, 16-24 (1995)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.