×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Finite element methods for one-dimensional combustion problems. (English) Zbl 0705.76057
Summary: Three adaptive finite element methods based on equidistribution, elliptic grid generation and hybrid techniques are used to study a system of reaction-diffusion equations. It is shown that these techniques must employ sub-equidistributing meshes in order to avoid ill-conditioned matrices and ensure the convergence of the Newton method. It is also shown that elliptic grid generation methods require much longer computer times than hybrid and static rezoning procedures. The paper also includes characteristic, Petrov-Galerkin and flux-corrected transport algorithms which are used to study a linear convection-reaction-diffusion equation that has an analytical solution. The flux-corrected transport technique yields monotonic solutions in good agreement with the analytical solution, whereas the Petrov-Galerkin method with quadratic upstream- weighted functions results in very diffused temperature profiles. The characteristic finite element method which uses a Lagrangian-Eulerian formulation overpredicts the flame front location and exhibits overshoots and undershoots near the temperature discontinuity. These overshoots and undershoots are due to the interpolation of the results of the Lagrangian operator onto the fixed Eulerian grid used to solve the reaction- diffusion operator, and indicate that characteristic finite element methods are not able to eliminate numerical diffusion entirely.

MSC:
76L05 Shock waves and blast waves in fluid mechanics
76M10 Finite element methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics
80A25 Combustion
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Brackbill, J. Comput. Phys. 46 pp 342– (1982)
[2] ’Finite element methods for one-dimensional flame propagation problems’, in (ed.), Numerical Modeling in Combustion, Hemisphere, Washington, DC, 1990, Chap. 3.
[3] and , ’An adaptive moving grid method for one-dimensional systems of partial differential equations’, Report NM-R8804, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam, 1988.
[4] Eiseman, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 64 pp 321– (1987)
[5] Thompson, Appl. Numer. Math. 1 pp 3– (1985)
[6] Dorfi, J. Comput. Phys. 69 pp 175– (1987)
[7] Dwyer, Physica D 20 pp 142– (1986)
[8] Petzold, Appl. Numer. Math. 3 pp 347– (1987)
[9] Mueller, Int. j. numer. methods eng. 21 pp 2099– (1985)
[10] Miller, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 18 pp 1019– (1981)
[11] Adjerid, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 55 pp 3– (1986)
[12] and , ’Numerical modeling of unsteady flame propagation’, Report SAND 77-8275, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, 1978. · Zbl 0388.76090
[13] ’Finite element methods for one-dimensional combustion problems’, in and (eds.) Finite Element Analysis in Fluids, The University of Alabama in Huntsville Press, Huntsville, AL, pp. 283-289, 1989.
[14] and , Finite Element Analysis and Applications, Wiley, New York, 1985.
[15] Christie, Int. j. numer. methods eng. 10 pp 1389– (1976)
[16] Hughes, Int. j. numer. methods eng. 12 pp 1359– (1978)
[17] Hughes, Int. j. numer. methods fluids 7 pp 1261– (1987)
[18] Fujinawa, Int. j. numer. methods eng. 23 pp 1161– (1986)
[19] Boris, J. Comput. Phys. 11 pp 38– (1973)
[20] Boris, J. Comput. Phys. 20 pp 397– (1976)
[21] Löhner, Int. j. numer. methods fluids 7 pp 1093– (1987)
[22] Oden, Int. j. numer methods. fluids 7 pp 1211– (1987)
[23] Kautsky, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 1 pp 499– (1980)
[24] Ding, Int. j. numer. methods eng. 28 pp 1023– (1989)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.