×

Modeling the collagen fibril network of biological tissues as a nonlinearly elastic material using a continuous volume fraction distribution function. (English) Zbl 1269.74155

Summary: Despite distinct mechanical functions, biological soft tissues have a common microstructure in which a ground matrix is reinforced by a collagen fibril network. The microstructural properties of the collagen network contribute to continuum mechanical tissue properties that are strongly anisotropic with tensile-compressive asymmetry. In this study, a novel approach based on a continuous distribution of collagen fibril volume fractions is developed to model fibril reinforced soft tissues as nonlinearly elastic and anisotropic material. Compared with other approaches that use a normalized number of fibrils for the definition of the distribution function, this representation is based on a distribution parameter (i.e. volume fraction) that is commonly measured experimentally while also incorporating pre-stress of the collagen fibril network in a tissue natural configuration. After motivating the form of the collagen strain energy function, examples are provided for two volume fraction distribution functions. Consequently, collagen second-Piola Kirchhoff stress and elasticity tensors are derived, first in general form and then specifically for a model that may be used for immature bovine articular cartilage. It is shown that the proposed strain energy is a convex function of the deformation gradient tensor and, thus, is suitable for the formation of a polyconvex tissue strain energy function.

MSC:

74L15 Biomechanical solid mechanics
74B20 Nonlinear elasticity
74E30 Composite and mixture properties
92C10 Biomechanics
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI Link

References:

[1] Minns, RJ, J Anat 123 (2) pp 437– (1977)
[2] Broom, ND, J Anat 146 pp 185– (1986)
[3] Redler, I., Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975 (112) pp 357–
[4] Woo, SL, J Biomech 12 (6) pp 437– (1979) · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(79)90028-9
[5] Soltz, MA, J Biomech Eng 122 (6) pp 576– (2000) · doi:10.1115/1.1324669
[6] Shirazi, R., J Biomech 41 (16) pp 3340– (2008) · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.09.033
[7] Gasser, TC, J R Soc Interface 3 (6) pp 15– (2006) · doi:10.1098/rsif.2005.0073
[8] Lanir, Y., J Biomech 16 (1) pp 1– (1983) · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(83)90041-6
[9] Lei, F., Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science
[10] Ateshian, GA, J Biomech Eng 129 (2) pp 240– (2007) · doi:10.1115/1.2486179
[11] Federico, S., J Biomech 41 (16) pp 3309– (2008) · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.039
[12] Klisch, SM, J Biomech Eng 130 (3) pp 031006– (2008) · doi:10.1115/1.2907754
[13] Williamson, AK, J Orthop Res 21 (5) pp 872– (2003) · doi:10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00030-5
[14] Williams, GM, J Biomech 43 (13) pp 2501– (2010) · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.05.022
[15] Schröder, J., International Journal of Solids and Structures 40 (2) pp 401– (2003) · Zbl 1033.74005 · doi:10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00458-4
[16] Ball, JM, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 63 (4) pp 337– (1976) · Zbl 0368.73040 · doi:10.1007/BF00279992
[17] Ogden, RW, Non-Linear Elastic Deformations (1997)
[18] Ciarlet, PG, Three-Dimensional Elasticity. ”Studies in Mathematics and its Applications” (1998)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.