×

Accounting for political opinions, power, and influence: a voting advice application. (English) Zbl 1403.91302

Summary: Voting advice applications (VAAs) are online decision support systems that try to match voters with political parties or candidates in elections, typically based on how each responds to a number of policy issue statements. Such VAAs play a major role in many countries. In this paper, we describe the development and large-scale application of a new innovative matching algorithm for the most widely used VAA in Finland. We worked closely with the owner of the VAA, the largest daily newspaper in Finland, Helsingin Sanomat. Their previous algorithm, which one might call a “naive” approach, was improved by including measures of candidate’s political power and influence, using proxy variables of media visibility and incumbency status. The VAA was implemented for the 2015 Parliamentary election in Finland; our matching algorithm was used by 140,000 voters (26.7% of the electorate) in the Helsinki election district. The innovative algorithm generated recommendations that many voters were happy about, followed by users’ incidental comments that this was the first time the VAA recommended candidates they wanted to vote for. This showed the importance of catering to different kinds of voters with a model not previously considered by any VAA in any country.

MSC:

91F10 History, political science
91B12 Voting theory

Software:

mclogit
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Balinski, M.; Laraki, R., Judge: Don’t vote!, Operations Research, 62, 3, 483-511 (2014) · Zbl 1307.91067
[2] Bartels, L. M., Uninformed votes: Information effects in Presidential Elections, American Journal of Political Science, 40, 1, 194-230 (1996)
[3] Bekafigo, M. A.; McBride, A., Who Tweets about politics?: Political participation of Twitter users during the 2011 Gubernatorial Elections, Social Science Computer Review, 31, 5, 625-643 (2013)
[4] Blais, A.; Massicotte, L., Electoral systems, (LeDuc, L.; Niemi, R.; Norris, P., Comparing democracies: New challenges in the study of elections and voting (2002), Sage: Sage London), 40-69
[5] Bond, S. D.; Carlson, K. A.; Keeney, R. L., Generating objectives: Can decision makers articulate what they want?, Management Science, 54, 1, 56-70 (2008)
[6] Cox, G., Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world’s electoral systems (1997), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge
[7] Downs, A., An economic theory of political action in a democracy, Journal of Political Economy, 65, 2, 135-150 (1957)
[8] Elff, M. (2016). mclogit: Mixed Conditional Logit Models. R package version 0.4.4. https://cran.r-project.org/package=mclogit; Elff, M. (2016). mclogit: Mixed Conditional Logit Models. R package version 0.4.4. https://cran.r-project.org/package=mclogit
[9] Official Statistics of Finland, Parliamentary elections, Technical Report (2015), Statistics Finland: Statistics Finland Helsinki
[10] Gallego, M.; Schofield, N.; McAlister, K.; Jeon, J. S., The variable choice set logit model applied to the 2004 Canadian election, Public Choice, 158, 3-4, 427-463 (2014)
[11] Garzia, D.; Marschall, S., Voting advice applications under review: the state of research, International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5, 3-4, 203-222 (2012)
[12] Karvonen, L., Politiikan henkilöityminen, (Borg, S.; Paloheimo, H., Vaalit yleisödemokratiassa (2009), Tampere University Press: Tampere University Press Tampere), 94-125
[13] Keeney, R. L.; Raiffa, H., Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs (1993), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK · Zbl 0488.90001
[14] Ladner, A.; Fivaz, J.; Pianzola, J., Voting advice applications and party choice: evidence from smartvote users in Switzerland, International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5, 3-4, 367-387 (2012)
[15] Larsson, A. O.; Moe, H., Who tweets? tracking microblogging use in the 2010 swedish election campaign, Proceedings of the nineteenth european conference on information systems (ECIS) (2011)
[16] Lau, R. R.; Redlawsk, D. P., Voting correctly, The American Political Science Review, 91, 3, 585-598 (1997)
[17] Lau, R. R.; Redlawsk, D. P., Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making, American Journal of Political Science, 45, 4, 951-971 (2001)
[18] Lefevere, J.; Walgrave, S., A perfect match? The impact of statement selection on voting advice applications’ ability to match voters and parties, Electoral Studies, 36, 252-262 (2014)
[19] Louwerse, T.; Rosema, M., The design effects of voting advice applications: Comparing methods of calculating matches, Acta Politica, 49, 3, 286-312 (2014)
[20] Marschall, S.; Schmidt, C., The impact of voting indicators: The case of the German Wahl-o-Mat, (Cedroni, L.; Garzia, D., Voting advice applications in Europe: The state of the art (2010), Scripta Web: Scripta Web Naples), 61-86
[21] Niemeyer, H.; Niemeyer, A., Apportionment Methods, Mathematical Social Sciences, 56, 2, 240-253 (2008) · Zbl 1142.91426
[22] (Niemi, R.; Weisberg, H.; Kimball, D., Controversies in voting behavior (2010), CQ Press: CQ Press Washington, DC, US)
[23] Pissarides, C. A., Equilibrium unemployment theory (2000), The MIT Press: The MIT Press Cambridge, Mass.
[24] Wall, M.; Sudulich, M. L.; Costello, R.; Leon, E., Picking your party online - An investigation of Ireland’s first online voting advice application, Information Polity, 14, 3, 203-218 (2009)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.