×

AVE-CPFR working chains on the basis of selection model of collaborative credit-granting guarantee approaches. (English) Zbl 1203.90087

Summary: This paper presents AVE and CPFR concepts and their characteristics, establishes and analyzes the AVE-based CPFR working flow, and illustrates the content of the grid resource management and the mission in relation to the corresponding grid resource management system. It focuses on the working flow of the AVE-based CPFR. On this basis, it proposes the AVE-related CPFR mechanism grounded on grid, and further analyzes its working principles, grid methods matching the AVE-related CPFR working flow, the strengths of this mechanism as well as the n-tier prediction working flow. In addition, it constructs the selection model of credit-granting guarantee approaches and provides evidence for it. Under this mechanism, credit risk in the AVE enterprises can be optimized, and the AVE chain matches the working mechanism of CPFR in their capacities of real-time resource sharing, n-tier resource allocation, mission assignment, control, and supervision. It is hoped that the distance management and risk blockage could be achieved in supply chains within AVE enterprises by establishing a strong self-organized and self-control working chain.

MSC:

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
91G50 Corporate finance (dividends, real options, etc.)
91G40 Credit risk
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Davidow W. H., The Virtual Corporation: Structuring and Revitalizing the Corporation for the 21st Century (1992)
[2] Smarr L., Commun. ACM 35 pp 45–
[3] Credit Monitor Overview (1993)
[4] Morgan J. P., Credit Metrics (1997)
[5] KMV and Credit Metrics (1997)
[6] DOI: 10.2469/faj.v52.n6.2040 · doi:10.2469/faj.v52.n6.2040
[7] DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00058-8 · doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00058-8
[8] Credit Portfolio View (1997)
[9] Wilson T., Credit Risk Modeling: A New Approach (1997)
[10] B. Belkin, S. Suchower and L. R. Forest, The Effect of Systematic Credit Risk on Loan Portfolio Value-at-Risk and Loan Pricing (CreditMetrics Monitor, First Quarter, 1998) pp. 17–28.
[11] DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00053-9 · doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00053-9
[12] DOI: 10.1142/S0219622006002076 · doi:10.1142/S0219622006002076
[13] DOI: 10.1142/S0219622006001848 · doi:10.1142/S0219622006001848
[14] DOI: 10.1142/S0219622008002831 · Zbl 1153.91609 · doi:10.1142/S0219622008002831
[15] DOI: 10.1142/S0219622008003083 · Zbl 1159.90469 · doi:10.1142/S0219622008003083
[16] DOI: 10.1177/109434200101500302 · doi:10.1177/109434200101500302
[17] Scott W., Inven. Manage. Rep. 3 pp 1–
[18] DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8191(02)00094-7 · doi:10.1016/S0167-8191(02)00094-7
[19] DOI: 10.1142/S0219622008003204 · Zbl 05506004 · doi:10.1142/S0219622008003204
[20] Zhang Y. H., Technoecon. Manage. Res. 26 pp 75–
[21] DOI: 10.2307/2329873 · doi:10.2307/2329873
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.