×

MDCgo takes up the association/correlation challenge for grouped ordinal data. (English) Zbl 1437.62209

Summary: The subjective assessment of quality of life, personal skills and the agreement with a certain opinion are common issues in clinical, social, behavioral and marketing research. A wide set of surveys providing ordinal data arises. Beside such variables, other common surveys generate responses on a continuous scale, where the variable actual point value cannot be observed since data belong to certain groups. This paper introduces a re-formalization of the recent “Monotonic Dependence Coefficient” (MDC) suitable to all frameworks in which, given two variables, the independent variable is expressed in ordinal categories and the dependent variable is grouped. We denote this novel coefficient with \(\text{MDC}\text{go}\). The \(\text{MDC}\text{go}\) behavior and the scenarios in which it presents better performance with respect to the alternative correlation/association measures, such as Spearman’s \(r_\text{S}\), Kendall’s \(\tau_b\) and Somers’ \(\varDelta\) coefficients, are explored through a Monte Carlo simulation study. Finally, to shed light on the usefulness of the proposal in real surveys, an application to drug-expenditure data is considered.

MSC:

62H20 Measures of association (correlation, canonical correlation, etc.)
62P25 Applications of statistics to social sciences
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI Link

References:

[1] Agresti, A.: Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2010) · Zbl 1263.62007 · doi:10.1002/9780470594001
[2] Ahrens, W., Pigeot, I.: Handbook of Epidemiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005) · Zbl 1094.92052 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-26577-1
[3] Aimar, F.: Local reimbursed pharmaceutical expenditure monitoring through the use of statistical tools. Ph.D. Dissertation Thesis, University of Turin (2012)
[4] Bernardini, A.C., Spandonaro, F.: Pharmaceutical Assistance: access to innovation, sustainability and selectivity. 10th Health Report, Chapter 9 (in Italian) (2014)
[5] Blitz, R.C., Brittain, J.A.: An extension of the Lorenz diagram to the correlation of two variables. Metron XXIII(1-4), 137-143 (1964)
[6] Denuit, M., Lambert, P.: Constraints on concordance measures in bivariate discrete data. J. Multivar. Anal. 93, 40-57 (2005) · Zbl 1095.62065 · doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2004.01.004
[7] Ferrari, P.A., Raffinetti, E.: A different approach to Dependence Analysis. Multivar. Behav. Res. 50(2), 248-264 (2015) · doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.973099
[8] Goodman, L.A., Kruskal, W.H.: Measures of association for cross classifications. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 49, 732-764 (1954) · Zbl 0056.12801
[9] Hofert, M.: On sampling from the multivariate \[t\] t distribution. R J. 5(2), 129-136 (2013)
[10] Jonckheere, A.R.: A distribution-free \[k\] k-sample. Tests against ordered alternatives. Biometrika 41, 133-145 (1954) · Zbl 0058.35304
[11] Kendall, K.: New measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30(1-2), 81-89 (1938) · Zbl 0019.13001 · doi:10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81
[12] Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 22(140), 5-55 (1932)
[13] Lorenz, M.O.: Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publ. Am. Stat. Assoc. 9(70), 209-219 (1905)
[14] Martin, J., Gonzales, M.P.L., Garcia, D.C.: Review of the literature of the determinants of healthcare expenditure. Appl. Econ. 43, 19-46 (2011) · doi:10.1080/00036841003689754
[15] Marshall, A.W., Olkin, I., Arnold, C.A.: Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2011) · Zbl 1219.26003 · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-68276-1
[16] Norman, G.: Likert scales, levels of measurement and the law of statistics. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. 15, 625-632 (2010) · doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
[17] OECD: Estimating expenditure by disease, age and gender under the system of health accounts (SHA) framework. Final report. http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/EstimatingExpenditurebyDiseaseAgeandGender_FinalReport.pdf (2008). Accessed 15 Mar 2017
[18] Owens, G.M.: Gender differences in health care expenditures, resource utilization, and quality of care. J. Manag. Care Pharm. 14(3 Suppl), 2-6 (2008)
[19] Pearson, K.: Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution-XVI. In: Pearson, K. (ed.) On Further Methods for Determining Correlation. Draper’s Company Research Memoirs, Biometric Series, vol. IV. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp. 1-39 (1907) · JFM 38.0290.04
[20] Rodgers, J.L., Nicewander, W.A.: Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. Am. Stat. 42(1), 59-66 (1988) · doi:10.2307/2685263
[21] Roth, M.: On the multivariate t distribution. Report no.: LiTH-ISY-R-3059 (2013)
[22] Schezhtman, E., Yitzhaki, S.: A measure of association based on Gini’s mean difference. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 16(1), 207-231 (1987) · Zbl 0617.62061 · doi:10.1080/03610928708829359
[23] Somers, R.H.: A new asymmetric measure of association for ordinal variables. Am. Sociol. Rev. 27, 799-811 (1962) · doi:10.2307/2090408
[24] Stuart, A.: The estimation and comparison of strengths of association in contingency tables. Biometrika 40, 105-110 (1953) · Zbl 0050.36405 · doi:10.2307/2333101
[25] Spearman, C.: The proof and measurement of correlation between two things. Am. J. Psychol. 15, 72-101 (1904) · doi:10.2307/1412159
[26] Terpstra, T.J.: The asymptotic normality and consistency of Kendall’s test against trend, when ties are present in one ranking. Indigationes Mathematicae 14, 327-333 (1952) · Zbl 0046.36304 · doi:10.1016/S1385-7258(52)50043-X
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.