×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

A geometry- and muscle-based control architecture for synthesising biological movement. (English) Zbl 07328321
Summary: A key problem for biological motor control is to establish a link between an idea of a movement and the generation of a set of muscle-stimulating signals that lead to the movement execution. The number of signals to generate is thereby larger than the body’s mechanical degrees of freedom in which the idea of the movement may be easily expressed, as the movement is actually executed in this space. A mathematical formulation that provides a solving link is presented in this paper in the form of a layered, hierarchical control architecture. It is meant to synthesise a wide range of complex three-dimensional muscle-driven movements. The control architecture consists of a ‘conceptional layer’, where the movement is planned, a ‘structural layer’, where the muscles are stimulated, and between both an additional ‘transformational layer’, where the muscle-joint redundancy is resolved. We demonstrate the operativeness by simulating human stance and squatting in a three-dimensional digital human model (DHM). The DHM considers 20 angular DoFs and 36 Hill-type muscle-tendon units (MTUs) and is exposed to gravity, while its feet contact the ground via reversible stick-slip interactions. The control architecture continuously stimulates all MTUs (‘structural layer’) based on a high-level, torque-based task formulation within its ‘conceptional layer’. Desired states of joint angles (postural plan) are fed to two mid-level joint controllers in the ‘transformational layer’. The ‘transformational layer’ communicates with the biophysical structures in the ‘structural layer’ by providing direct MTU stimulation contributions and further input signals for low-level MTU controllers. Thereby, the redundancy of the MTU stimulations with respect to the joint angles is resolved, i.e. a link between plan and execution is established, by exploiting some properties of the biophysical structures modelled. The resulting joint torques generated by the MTUs via their moment arms are fed back to the conceptional layer, closing the high-level control loop. Within our mathematical formulations of the Jacobian matrix-based layer transformations, we identify the crucial information for the redundancy solution to be the muscle moment arms, the stiffness relations of muscle and tendon tissue within the muscle model, and the length-stimulation relation of the muscle activation dynamics. The present control architecture allows the straightforward feeding of conceptional movement task formulations to MTUs. With this approach, the problem of movement planning is eased, as solely the mechanical system has to be considered in the conceptional plan.
MSC:
92C10 Biomechanics
Software:
Eigen
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Alexandrov, AV; Frolov, AA; Massion, J., Biomechanical analysis of movement strategies in human forward trunk bending I. Modeling, Biol Cybern, 84, 6, 425-434 (2001)
[2] Arbib, MA; Amari, S-I, Sensori-motor transformations in the brain (with a critique of the tensor theory of cerebellum), J Theor Biol, 112, 1, 123-155 (1985)
[3] Bayer, A.; Schmitt, S.; Günther, M.; Haeufle, DF, The influence of biophysical muscle properties on simulating fast human arm movements, Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng, 20, 8, 803-821 (2017)
[4] Bernstein, NA, The co-ordination and regulation of movements (1967), Oxford: Pergamon Press, Oxford
[5] Bizzi, E.; Hogan, N.; Mussa-Ivaldo, F.; Giszter, S., Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements?, Behav Brain Sci, 15, 4, 603-613 (1992)
[6] Blakemore, S-J; Frith, CD; Wolpert, DM, Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli, J Cogn Neurosci, 11, 5, 551-559 (1999)
[7] Brändle, S.; Schmitt, S.; Müller, MA, A systems-theoretic analysis of low-level human motor control: application to a single-joint arm model, J Math Biol, 80, 4, 1139-1158 (2020) · Zbl 1432.92004
[8] de Luca, CJ; Contessa, P., Hierarchical control of motor units in voluntary contractions, J Neurophysiol, 107, 1, 178-195 (2012)
[9] De Serres, S.; Milner, T., Wrist muscle activation patterns and stiffness associated with stable and unstable mechanical loads, Exp Brain Res, 86, 2, 451-458 (1991)
[10] DeWolf, T.; Eliasmith, C., The neural optimal control hierarchy for motor control, J Neural Eng, 8, 6, 065009 (2011)
[11] Doya, K., Complementary roles of basal ganglia and cerebellum in learning and motor control, Curr Opin Neurobiol, 10, 6, 732-739 (2000)
[12] Edwards, WT, Effect of joint stiffness on standing stability, Gait Posture, 25, 3, 432-439 (2007)
[13] Feldman, A., Control of the length of a muscle, Biophysics, 19, 2, 766-771 (1974)
[14] Ford, L.; Huxley, A.; Simmons, R., Tension responses to sudden length change in stimulated frog muscle fibres near slack length, J Physiol, 269, 2, 441-515 (1977)
[15] Full, R.; Koditschek, D., Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land, J Exp Biol, 202, Pt 23, 3325-3332 (1999)
[16] Ganesh, G.; Nakamura, K.; Saetia, S.; Tobar, AM; Yoshida, E.; Ando, H.; Yoshimura, N.; Koike, Y., Utilizing sensory prediction errors for movement intention decoding: a new methodology, Sci Adv, 4, 5, eaaq0183 (2018)
[17] Gao, J-H; Parsons, LM; Bower, JM; Xiong, J.; Li, J.; Fox, PT, Cerebellum implicated in sensory acquisition and discrimination rather than motor control, Science, 272, 5261, 545-547 (1996)
[18] Gentili, R.; Han, CE; Schweighofer, N.; Papaxanthis, C., Motor learning without doing: trial-by-trial improvement in motor performance during mental training, J Neurophysiol, 104, 2, 774-783 (2010)
[19] Ghazi-Zahedi, K., Morphological Intelligence (2019), Berlin: Springer, Berlin
[20] Gribble, P.; Mullin, L.; Cothros, N.; Mattar, A., Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy, J Neurophysiol, 89, 5, 2396-2405 (2003)
[21] Gribble, P.; Ostry, D.; Sanguineti, V.; Laboissière, R., Are complex control signals required for human arm movement?, J Neurophysiol, 79, 3, 1409-1424 (1998)
[22] Guennebaud G, Jacob B et al (2010) Eigen v3. http://eigen.tuxfamily.org
[23] Günther M (1997) Computersimulationen zur Synthetisierung des muskulär erzeugten menschlichen Gehens unter Verwendung eines biomechanischen Mehrkörpermodells. Ph.D. thesis, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany
[24] Günther, M.; Haeufle, DFB; Schmitt, S., The basic mechanical structure of the skeletal muscle machinery: one model for linking microscopic and macroscopic scales, J Theor Biol, 456, 137-167 (2018) · Zbl 1406.92027
[25] Günther, M.; Müller, O.; Blickhan, R., Watching quiet human stance to shake off its straitjacket, Arch Appl Mech, 81, 3, 283-302 (2011)
[26] Günther, M.; Müller, O.; Blickhan, R., What does head movement tell about the minimum number of mechanical degrees of freedom in quiet human stance?, Arch Appl Mech, 82, 3, 333-344 (2012)
[27] Günther, M.; Ruder, H., Synthesis of two-dimensional human walking: a test of the \(\lambda \)-model, Biol Cybern, 89, 2, 89-106 (2003) · Zbl 1084.92004
[28] Günther, M.; Wagner, H., Dynamics of quiet human stance: computer simulations of a triple inverted pendulum model, Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng, 19, 8, 819-834 (2016)
[29] Habas, C.; Bertholz, A.; Flash, T.; Bennequin, D., Does the cerebellum implement or select geometries? A speculative note, The Cerebellum, 19, 2, 1-7 (2020)
[30] Haeufle, DFB; Günther, M.; Bayer, A.; Schmitt, S., Hill-type muscle model with serial damping and eccentric force-velocity relation, J Biomech, 47, 6, 1531-1536 (2014)
[31] Haeufle, DFB; Günther, M.; Wunner, G.; Schmitt, S., Quantifying control effort of biological and technical movements: an information-entropy-based approach, Phys Rev E, 89, 1, 012716 (2014)
[32] Hammer, M.; Günther, M.; Haeufle, D.; Schmitt, S., Tailoring anatomical muscle paths: a sheath-like solution for muscle routing in musculo-skeletal computer models, Math Biosci, 311, 68-81 (2019) · Zbl 1425.92017
[33] Hartenberg, RS; Denavit, J., A kinematic notation for lower pair mechanisms based on matrices, J Appl Mech, 77, 2, 215-221 (1955) · Zbl 0064.15603
[34] Hatze, H., A myocybernetic control model of skeletal muscle, Biol Cybern, 25, 2, 103-119 (1977) · Zbl 0346.92011
[35] Henze A (2002) Dreidimensionale biomechanische Modellierung und die Entwicklung eines Reglers zur Simulation zweibeinigen Gehens. Ph.D. thesis, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany
[36] Herzfeld, DJ; Shadmehr, R., Cerebellum estimates the sensory state of the body, Trends Cognit Sci, 18, 2, 66-67 (2014)
[37] Hogan, N.; Winters, JM; Woo, SL-Y, Chapter 9: Mechanical impedance of single- and multi-articular systems, Multiple muscle systems, 149-164 (1990), Berlin: Springer, Berlin
[38] Holmes, P.; Full, R.; Koditschek, D.; Guckenheimer, J., The dynamics of legged locomotion: models, analyses, and challenges, SIAM Rev, 48, 2, 207-304 (2006) · Zbl 1100.34002
[39] Hsu, W-L; Scholz, JP, Motor abundance supports multitasking while standing, Hum Mov Sci, 31, 4, 844-862 (2012)
[40] Hulliger, M.; Dürmüller, N.; Prochazka, A.; Trend, P., Flexible fusimotor control of muscle spindle feedback during a variety of natural movements, Prog Brain Res, 80, 87-101 (1989)
[41] Kiehn, O., Decoding the organization of spinal circuits that control locomotion, Nat Rev Neurosci, 17, 4, 224-238 (2016)
[42] Kistemaker, DA; van Soest, AJ; Bobbert, MF, Is equilibrium point control feasible for fast goal-directed single-joint movements?, J Neurophysiol, 95, 5, 2898-2912 (2006)
[43] Kistemaker, DA; van Soest, AJ; Bobbert, MF, A model of open-loop control of equilibrium position and stiffness of the human elbow joint, Biol Cybern, 96, 3, 341-350 (2007) · Zbl 1161.92307
[44] Kolda, TG; Bader, BW, Tensor decompositions and applications, SIAM Rev, 51, 3, 455-500 (2009) · Zbl 1173.65029
[45] Latash, ML, The bliss (not the problem) of motor abundance (not redundancy), Exp Brain Res, 217, 1, 1-5 (2012)
[46] Latash, ML; Scholz, JP; Schöner, G., Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability, Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 30, 1, 26-31 (2002)
[47] Legnani, G.; Casalo, F.; Righettini, P.; Zappa, B., A homogeneous matrix approach to 3d kinematics and dynamics - II. Applications to chains of rigid bodies and serial manipulators, Mech Mach Theory, 31, 5, 589-605 (1996)
[48] Legnani, G.; Casolo, F.; Righettini, P.; Zappa, B., A homogeneous matrix approach to 3d kinematics and dynamics—I. Theory, Mech Mach Theory, 31, 5, 573-587 (1996)
[49] Martin, JH, The corticospinal system: from development to motor control, Neuroscientist, 11, 2, 161-173 (2005)
[50] Matthews, P., A study of certain factors influencing the stretch reflex of the decerebrate cat, J Physiol, 147, 3, 547 (1959)
[51] McIntyre, J.; Bizzi, E., Servo hypotheses for the biological control of movement, J Mot Behav, 25, 3, 193-202 (1993)
[52] Merel, J.; Botvinick, M.; Wayne, G., Hierarchical motor control in mammals and machines, Nat Commun, 10, 1, 5489 (2019)
[53] Milner, T., Adaptation to destabilizing dynamics by means of muscle cocontraction, Exp Brain Res, 143, 4, 406-416 (2002)
[54] Milner, T.; Cloutier, C.; Leger, A.; Franklin, D., Inability to activate muscles maximally during cocontraction and the effect on joint stiffness, Exp Brain Res, 107, 2, 293-305 (1995)
[55] Mörl, F.; Siebert, T.; Schmitt, S.; Blickhan, R.; Günther, M., Electro-mechanical delay in Hill-type muscle models, J Mech Med Biol, 12, 5, 85-102 (2020)
[56] Naito, E.; Morita, T.; Amemiya, K., Body representations in the human brain revealed by kinesthetic illusions and their essential contributions to motor control and corporeal awareness, Neurosci Res, 104, 16-30 (2016)
[57] Park, JH, Impedance control for biped robot locomotion, IEEE Trans Robot Autom, 17, 6, 870-882 (2001)
[58] Pellionisz, A.; Llinás, RR, Tensor network theory of the metaorganization of functional geometries in the central nervous system, Neuroscience, 16, 2, 245-273 (1985)
[59] Piazzesi, G.; Lombardi, V., A cross-bridge model that is able to explain mechanical and energetic properties of shortening muscle, Biophys J, 68, 5, 1966-1979 (1995)
[60] Pinter, IJ; van Soest, AJ; Bobbert, MF; Smeets, JBJ, Conclusions on motor control depend on the type of model used to represent the periphery, Biol Cybern, 106, 8, 441-451 (2012)
[61] Pratt J, Dilworth P, Pratt G (1997) Virtual model control of a bipedal walking robot. In: Proceedings of the international conference on robotics and automation, vol 1. IEEE, pp 193-198
[62] Pratt J, Pratt G (1998) Intuitive control of a planar bipedal walking robot. In: Proceedings of the international conference on robotics and automation, vol 3. IEEE, pp 2014-2021
[63] Prescott, TJ; Redgrave, P.; Gurney, K., Layered control architectures in robots and vertebrates, Adapt Behav, 7, 1, 99-127 (1999)
[64] Rockenfeller, R.; Günther, M., Hill equation and Hatze’s muscle activation dynamics complement each other: enhanced pharmacological and physiological interpretability of modelled activity-pCa curves, J Theor Biol, 431, 11-24 (2017) · Zbl 1388.92015
[65] Rockenfeller, R.; Günther, M., Inter-filament spacing mediates calcium binding to troponin: a simple geometric-mechanistic model explains the shift of force-length maxima with muscle activation, J Theor Biol, 454, 240-252 (2018) · Zbl 1406.92116
[66] Rockenfeller, R.; Günther, M.; Schmitt, S.; Götz, T., Comparative sensitivity analysis of muscle activation dynamics, Comput Math Methods Med, 2015, 585409 (2015) · Zbl 1335.92013
[67] Rozendaal LA, van Soest AJ (2005) Joint stiffness requirements in a multi-segment stance model. In: Proceedings of the XXth congress of the ISB, Cleveland, Ohio, p 622
[68] Rupp, T.; Ehlers, W.; Karajan, N.; Günther, M.; Schmitt, S., A forward dynamics simulation of human lumbar spine flexion predicting the load sharing of intervertebral discs, ligaments, and muscles, Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 14, 5, 1081-1105 (2015)
[69] Schmitt, S.; Günther, M.; Haeufle, DFB, The dynamics of the skeletal muscle: a systems biophysics perspective on muscle modeling with the focus on Hill-type muscle models, GAMM-Mitteilungen, 42, 3, e201900013 (2019)
[70] Scholz, JP; Schöner, G., The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task, Exp Brain Res, 126, 3, 289-306 (1999)
[71] Shampine, L.; Gordon, M., Computer solution of ordinary differential equations: the initial value problem (1975), San Francisco: W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco · Zbl 0347.65001
[72] Sherman MA, Seth A, Delp SL (2013) What is a moment arm? Calculating muscle effectiveness in biomechanical models using generalized coordinates. In: 9th international conference on multibody systems, nonlinear dynamics, and control, vol 7B. pp DETC2013-13633
[73] Smith, JW, The forces operating at the human ankle joint during standing, J Anat, 91, 4, 545-64 (1957)
[74] Stanev, D.; Moustakas, K., Stiffness modulation of redundant musculoskeletal systems, J Biomech, 85, 101-107 (2019)
[75] Stollenmaier, K.; Ilg, W.; Haeufle, DFB, Predicting perturbed human arm movements in a neuro-musculoskeletal model to investigate the muscular force response, Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 8, 308 (2020)
[76] Tarbouriech, S.; Turner, M., Anti-windup design: an overview of some recent advances and open problems, IET Control Theory Appl, 3, 1, 1-19 (2009)
[77] Todorov, E.; Li, W.; Pan, X., From task parameters to motor synergies: a hierarchical framework for approximately optimal control of redundant manipulators, J Robot Syst, 22, 11, 691-710 (2005) · Zbl 1133.70320
[78] Tresch, MC; Saltiel, P.; Bizzi, E., The construction of movement by the spinal cord, Nat Neurosci, 2, 2, 162-167 (1999)
[79] Tseng, Y-W; Diedrichsen, J.; Krakauer, JW; Shadmehr, R.; Bastian, AJ, Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching, J Neurophysiol, 98, 1, 54-62 (2007)
[80] van Soest, AJ; Bobbert, MF, The contribution of muscle properties in the control of explosive movements, Biol Cybern, 69, 3, 195-204 (1993)
[81] Wiener, N., Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine (1948), London: Technology Press, London · Zbl 0155.27901
[82] Wolpert, D.; Kawato, M., Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control, Neural Netw, 11, 7, 1317-1329 (1998)
[83] Wolpert, DM, Computational approaches to motor control, Trends Cogn Sci, 1, 6, 209-216 (1997)
[84] Wolpert, DM; Doya, K.; Kawato, M., A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction, Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci, 358, 1431, 593-602 (2003)
[85] Wolpert, DM; Flanagan, JR, Motor prediction, Curr Biol, 11, 18, R729-R732 (2001)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.