zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Optimal designs for conjoint experiments. (English) Zbl 1452.62581
Summary: In conjoint experiments, each respondent receives a set of profiles to rate. Sometimes, the profiles are expensive prototypes that respondents have to test before rating them. Designing these experiments involves determining how many and which profiles each respondent has to rate and how many respondents are needed. To that end, the set of profiles offered to a respondent is treated as a separate block in the design and a random respondent effect is used in the model because profile ratings from the same respondent are correlated. Optimal conjoint designs are then obtained by means of an adapted version of an algorithm for finding \(\mathcal D\)-optimal split-plot designs. A key feature of the design construction algorithm is that it returns the optimal number of respondents and the optimal number of profiles each respondent has to evaluate for a given number of profiles. The properties of the optimal designs are described in detail and some practical recommendations are given.

62K05 Optimal statistical designs
62K10 Statistical block designs
62-08 Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics
Full Text: DOI
[1] Atkinson, A.C.; Donev, A.N., Optimum experimental designs, (1992), Clarendon Press Oxford, UK · Zbl 0829.62070
[2] Brazier, J.; Roberts, J.; Deverill, M., The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36, J. of health econ., 21, 2, 271-292, (2002)
[3] Cochran, W.G.; Cox, G.M., Experimental designs, (1957), Wiley New York · Zbl 0077.13205
[4] Gilmour, S.G.; Trinca, L.A., Some practical advice on polynomial regression analysis from blocked response surface designs, Comm. statist. theory methods, 29, 9-10, 2157-2180, (2000) · Zbl 1061.62550
[5] Goos, P., The optimal design of blocked and split-plot experiments, (2002), Springer New York · Zbl 1008.62068
[6] Goos, P., Optimal versus orthogonal and equivalent-estimation design of blocked and split-plot experiments, Statist. neerlandica, 60, 3, 361-378, (2006) · Zbl 1108.62073
[7] Goos, P.; Vandebroek, M., \(\mathcal{D}\)-optimal response surface designs in the presence of random block effects, Comput. statist. data anal., 37, 4, 433-453, (2001) · Zbl 1079.62532
[8] Goos, P.; Vandebroek, M., Optimal split-plot designs, J. of quality tech., 33, 4, 436-450, (2001)
[9] Goos, P.; Vandebroek, M., \(\mathcal{D}\)-optimal split-plot designs with given numbers and sizes of whole plots, Technometrics, 45, 3, 235-245, (2003)
[10] Goos, P.; Vandebroek, M., Outperforming completely randomized designs, J. of quality tech., 36, 1, 12-26, (2004)
[11] Green, P.E.; Krieger, A.M.; Wind, Y., Thirty years of conjoint analysis: reflections and prospects, Interfaces, 31, 3, 56-73, (2001)
[12] Gustafsson, A.; Herrmann, A.; Huber, F., Conjoint analysis as an instrument of market research practice, (), 5-46
[13] Wittink, D.R.; Cattin, P., Commercial use of conjoint analysis: an update, J. of marketing, 53, 3, 91-96, (1989)
[14] Wittink, D.R.; Vriens, M.; Burhenne, W., Commercial use of conjoint analysis in Europe: results and critical reflections, Internat. J. of res. in marketing, 11, 1, 41-52, (1994)
[15] Wu, C.F.J.; Hamada, M., Experiments: planning, analysis, and parameter design optimization, (2000), Wiley New York
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.