×

Survival through the Allais paradox. (English) Zbl 0729.90959

MSC:

91B06 Decision theory
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Allais, Maurice: 1952, 1979a, ?Fondements d’une théorie positive des choix comportrant un risque et critique des postulats et axiomes de l’Ecole Americaine?. Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche, Vol. XL, Paris 1953. Also Allais and Hagen (eds.) (1979) q.v.: English translation.
[2] Allais, Maurice: 1979b, ?The so-called Allais paradox and rational decisions under uncertainty?, Allais and Hagen (eds.) (1979). · Zbl 0468.90002
[3] Allais, Maurice: 1983, ?The foundations of the theory of utility and risk?, Hagen and Wenstøp (eds.) (1984). · Zbl 0861.90006
[4] Allais, Maurice: 1985a, ?Three theorems on the theory of cardinal utility and random choice?, Eberlein and Berghel (eds.) (1987). · Zbl 0678.90014
[5] Allais, Maurice: 1985b, ?The Allais paradox? in The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economies Vol 1. Macmillan, London, 1987.
[6] Allais, Maurice: 1986, ?The general theory of random choices in relation to the invariant cardinal utility function and the specific probability function. The (U, O) model?, Munier, O. (ed.): Risk, Decision and Rationality. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987.
[7] Allais, Maurice: 1988, Scientific Papers on Risk and Utility Theory - Theory, Experience, and Applications. Forthcoming, Reidel. Ch. XVIII, ?Cardinal utility - history, empirical findings, and applications?.
[8] Allais, Maurice and Hagen, Ole (eds.): 1979, Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. Reidel, Dordrecht. · Zbl 0468.90002
[9] Bitz, Michael und Rogusch, Michael: 1976, Risiko-Nutzen, Geld-Nutzen und Risikoeinstellung. Zur Diskussion um das Bernoulli-Prinzip. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 46, 12.
[10] Blasche, H. and Dorfner, E.: 1987, ?Selection by proxy: A model for the simplification of decision under risk and under uncertainty?, Theory and Decision 23(3), 283-300. · Zbl 0641.90002 · doi:10.1007/BF00129151
[11] Borch, Karl: 1966, ?A utility function derived from a survival game?, Management Science 12, 287-295. · Zbl 0143.43304 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.12.8.B287
[12] Borch, Karl: 1968, ?Decision rules depending on the probability of ruin?, Oxford Economic Papers 20(1), 1-10.
[13] Chikan, A., Kindler, J. and Kiss., I. (eds.): 1991, Proceedings of the 4th FUR Conference. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
[14] Daboni et al. (eds.): 1985, Recent Developments in the Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory. Reidel, Dordrecht.
[15] Dahlbäck, Olof: 1990, ?An experimental analysis of risk taking?. Theory and Decision 29(3), 183-202. · doi:10.1007/BF00126801
[16] Geweke, John (ed.) (forthcoming): Decision Making under Risk and Uncertainty: New Models and Empirical Findings. Kluwer, Dordrecht. · Zbl 0915.90003
[17] Hagen, Ole: 1972, ?A new axiomatisation of utility under risk, Teorie a Metoda?, Reprint 1987/4, Norw. School of Management.
[18] Hagen, Ole: 1979, ?Towards a positive theory of decisions under risk?, Allais and Hagen (eds.) q.v.
[19] Hagen, Ole: 1991, ?Expected utility theory. The ?confirmation? that backfires? in Chikan, Kindler and Kiss (eds.) q.v. · Zbl 0825.90074
[20] Hagen, Ole (forthcoming): ?A true descriptive theory and a useful decision technique? in Geweke (ed.) q.v.
[21] Hagen, Ole and Wenstøp, Fred: 1984, Progress in Utility and Risk Theory. Reidel, Dordrecht. · Zbl 0584.90001
[22] Karni, Edi and Schmeidler, David: 1986, ?Self-preservation as a foundation of rational behavior under risk?, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation 7, 71-81. · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(86)90022-3
[23] Krelle, K.: 1968, Preferenz- und Entscheidungstheorie, J. C. B. Mohr, Tuebingen.
[24] Krelle, K.: 1984, ?Remarks to Professor Allais’ contributions to the theory of expected utility and related subjects?, Hagen and Wenstøp (eds.) q.v.
[25] Krzysztofowicz, Roman (forthcoming): ?Filtering risk effect in standard-gamble utility measurement?, Allais and Hagen (eds.): Cardinal Utility q.v.
[26] Loomes, G. and Sugden, R.: 1985, ?Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty?, Economic Journal 92, 805-824. · doi:10.2307/2232669
[27] Loomes, G. and Sugden, R.: ?Some implications of a more general form of regret theory?, available from authors. (Not read.) · Zbl 0633.90003
[28] Lopes, Lola: 1988, ?Economics as a psychology: A cognitive assay of the French and American schools of risk theory?, Munier (q.v.)
[29] MacCrimmon, K. R. and Larsson, S.: 1979, ?Utility theory: Axioms versus ?paradoxes?,? Allais and Hagen (eds.) q.v.
[30] Machina, Mark J.: 1983, ?Generalized expected utility analysis and the nature of observed violations of the independence axiom?, Stigum and Wenstøp (eds.) q.v.
[31] Munier, Bertrand R. (ed).: 1988, Risk, Decision and Rationality, Reidel, Dordrecht. · Zbl 0658.00021
[32] Pope, R.: 1985, ?Timing contradictions in Von Neumann and Morgenstern’s axioms and in Savage’s ?sure-thing? proof?, Theory and Decision 18, 229-262. · doi:10.1007/BF00126593
[33] Schoemaker, P.: 1982, ?The expected utility model: Its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations?, Journal of Economic Literature 20, 529-563.
[34] Snow, Paul: 1987, ?Maximizing expected utility is a survival criterion?, Theory and Decision 22(2), 143-154. · doi:10.1007/BF00126388
[35] Stigum, B. P. and Wenstøp, F. (eds.): 1983, Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory with Applications. Reidel, Dordrecht. · Zbl 0553.90002
[36] Ståhl, I.: 1980, ?Review? of Allais and Hagen (eds.) q.v., Scandinavian Journal of Economics 82, 413-417.
[37] Sugden, Robert: 1985, ?Regret, recrimination and rationality?, Theory and Decision 19(1), 77-100. · doi:10.1007/BF00134355
[38] Sugden, Robert: 1985, ?New developments in the theory of choice under uncertainty?, Hey, John D. and Lambert, P. J. (eds.) q.v.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.