×

Coupled multiple timescale dynamics in populations of endocrine neurons: pulsatile and surge patterns of GnRH secretion. (English) Zbl 1398.92040

Summary: The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is secreted by hypothalamic neurons into the pituitary portal blood in a pulsatile manner. The alternation between a frequency-modulated pulsatile regime and the ovulatory surge is the hallmark of the GnRH secretion pattern in ovarian cycles of female mammals. In this work, we aim at modeling additional features of the GnRH secretion pattern: the possible occurrence of a two-bump surge (“camel surge”) and an episode of partial desynchronization before the surge. We propose a six-dimensional extension of a former four-dimensional model with three timescales and introduce two mutually coupled, slightly heterogenous GnRH subpopulations (secretors) regulated by the same slow oscillator (regulator). We consider two types of coupling functions between the secretors, including dynamic state-dependent coupling, and we use numerical and analytic tools to characterize the coupling parameter values leading to the generation of a two-bump surge in both coupling cases. We reveal the impact of the slowly varying control exerted by the regulator onto the pulsatile dynamics of the secretors, which leads to dynamic bifurcations and gives rise to desynchronization. To assess the occurrence time of desynchronization during the pulsatile phase, we introduce asymptotic tools based on quasi-static and geometric approaches, as well as analytic tools based on the H-function derived from the phase equation and numerical tracking of period-doubling bifurcations. We discuss the role of coupling parameters in the two-bump surge generation and the speed of desynchronization.

MSC:

92C20 Neural biology
92B25 Biological rhythms and synchronization
34C23 Bifurcation theory for ordinary differential equations
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] I. Belykh, E. de Lange, and M. Hasler, Synchronization of bursting neurons: What matters in the network topology, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94 (2005), 188101.
[2] S. Ben Saïd, D. Lomet, D. Chesneau, L. Lardic, S. Canepa, D. Guillaume, C. Briant, C. Fabre-Nys, and A. Caraty, Differential estradiol requirement for the induction of estrus behavior and the luteinizing hormone surge in two breeds of sheep, Biol. Reprod., 76 (2007), pp. 673–680.
[3] A. Bose, N. Kopell, and D. Terman, Almost-synchronous solutions for mutually coupled excitatory neurons, Phys. D, 140 (2000), pp. 69–94. · Zbl 0957.34040
[4] P. Bradley, K. Wiesenfeld, and R.J. Butera, Effects of heterogeneity in synaptic conductance between weakly coupled identical neurons, J. Comput. Neurosci., 30 (2011), pp. 455–469.
[5] E. Brown, J. Moehlis, and P. Holmes, On the phase reduction and response dynamics od neural oscillator populations, Neural Comput., 16 (2003), pp. 673–715. · Zbl 1054.92006
[6] A. Caraty, B. Delaleu, D. Chesneau, and C. Fabre-Nys, Sequential role of E2 and GnRH for the expression of estrous behavior in ewe, Endocrinology, 143 (2002), pp. 139–145.
[7] A. Caraty, C. Fabre-Nys, B. Delaleu, A. Locatelli, G. Bruneau, F.J. Karsch, and A. Herbison, Evidence that the mediobasal hypothalamus is the primary site of action of estradiol in inducing the preovulatory gonadotropin releasing hormone surge in the ewe, Endocrinology, 139 (1998), pp. 1752–1760.
[8] A. Caraty and D.C. Skinner, Progesterone priming is essential for the full expression of the positive feedback effect of estradiol in inducing the preovulatory onadotropin-releasing hormone surge in the ewe, Endocrinology, 140 (1999), pp. 165–170.
[9] F. Clément and J.-P. Françoise, Mathematical modeling of the GnRH pulse and surge generator, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 6 (2007), pp. 441–456. · Zbl 1210.34053
[10] F. Clément and A. Vidal, Foliation-based parameter tuning in a model of GnRH pulse and surge generator, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 8 (2009), pp. 1591–1631. · Zbl 1193.34096
[11] S. Constantin, Progress and challenges in the search for the mechanisms of pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion, Front. Endocrinol., 8 (2017), 180.
[12] G. de Vries, A. Sherman, and H.-R. Zhu, Diffusively coupled bursters: Effects of cell heterogeneity, Bull. Math. Biol., 60 (1998), pp. 1167–1200. · Zbl 0942.92010
[13] M. Dhamala, V.K. Jirsa, and M. Ding, Transitions to synchrony in coupled bursting neurons, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92 (2004), 028101.
[14] B. Ermentrout, Type I membranes, phase resetting curves and synchrony, Neural Comput., 8 (1996), pp. 979–1001.
[15] B. Ermentrout, M. Pascal, and B. Gutkin, The effects of spike frequency adaptation and negative feedback on the synchronization of neural oscillators, Neural Comput., 13 (2001), pp. 1285–1310. · Zbl 0963.68647
[16] B. Ermentrout and D.H. Terman, Mathematical Foundations of Neuroscience, Springer, New York, 2010. · Zbl 1320.92002
[17] N.P. Evans, G.E. Dahl, V. Padmanabban, L.A. Thrun, and F.J. Karsh, Estradiol requirements for induction and maintenance of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone surge: Implications of neuroendocrine processing of the estradiol signal, Endocrinology, 138 (1997), pp. 5408–5414.
[18] N.P. Evans, G.E. Dahl, A. Caraty, V. Padmanabhan, L.A. Thrun, and F.J. Karsch, How much of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) surge is required for generation of the luteinizing hormone surge in the ewe? Duration of the endogenous GnRH signal, Endocrinology, 137 (1996), pp. 4730–4737.
[19] N.P. Evans, G.E. Dahl, D.T. Mauger, V. Padmanabhan, L.A. Thrun, and F.J. Karsch, Does estradiol induce the preovulatory gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) surge in the ewe by inducing a progressive change in the mode of operation of the GnRH neurosecretory system?, Endocrinology, 136 (1995), pp. 5511–5519.
[20] M. Feingold, D.L. Gonzalez, O. Piro, and H. Vitturo, Phase locking, period doubling, and chaotic phenomena in externally driven excitable systems, Phys. Rev. A (3), 37 (1988), pp. 4060–4064.
[21] D. Hansel, G. Mato, and C. Meunier, Synchrony in excitatory neural networks, Neural Comput., 7 (1995), pp. 307–337.
[22] F.C. Hoppensteadt and E.M. Izhikevich, Weakly Connected Neuronal Networks, Springer, New York, 1997.
[23] K.J. Iremonger and A.E. Herbison, Multitasking in gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuron dendrites, Neuroendocrinology, 102 (2013), pp. 1–7.
[24] E.M. Izhikevich, Phase equations for relaxation oscillators, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 60 (2000), pp. 1789–1804. · Zbl 1016.92001
[25] E.M. Izhikevich, Synchronization of elliptic bursters, SIAM Rev., 43 (2001), pp. 315–344. · Zbl 0992.92014
[26] E.M. Izhikevich and F.C. Hoppensteadt, Slowly coupled oscillators: Phase dynamics and synchronization, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 63 (2003), pp. 1935–1953. · Zbl 1058.92002
[27] J.Z. Kasa-Vubu, G.E. Dahl, N.P. Evans, L.A. Thrun, and F.J. Karsh, Progesterone blocks the estradiol-induced gonadotropin discharge in the ewe by inhibiting the surge of gonadotropin-releasing hormone, Endocrinology, 131 (1992), pp. 208–212.
[28] E. Köksal Ersöz, M. Desroches, and Krupa, Synchronization of weakly coupled canard oscillators, Phys. D, 349 (2017), pp. 46–61. · Zbl 1376.34052
[29] E. Köksal Ersöz, M. Desroches, M. Krupa, and F. Clément, Canard-mediated (de)synchronization in coupled phantom bursters, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 15 (2016), pp. 580–608. · Zbl 1337.34060
[30] M. Krupa, A. Vidal, and F. Clément, A network model of the periodic synchronization process in the dynamics of calcium concentration in GnRH neurons, J. Math. Neurosci., 3 (2013), 4. · Zbl 1291.92037
[31] M. Krupa, A. Vidal, M. Desroches, and F. Clément, Mixed-mode oscillations in a multiple time scale phantom bursting system, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 11 (2012), pp. 1458–1498. · Zbl 1260.34091
[32] W. Kurebayashi, S. Shirasaka, and H. Nakao, A criterion for timescale decomposition of external inputs for generalized phase reduction of limit-cycle oscillators, Nonlinear Theory Appl., 6 (2015), pp. 171–180.
[33] E. Lee and D. Terman, Stable antiphase oscillations in a network of electrically coupled model neurons, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 12 (2013), pp. 1–27. · Zbl 1285.34037
[34] E. Lee and D. Terman, Stability of antiphase oscillations in a network of inhibitory neurons, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 14 (2015), pp. 448–480. · Zbl 1318.34060
[35] T. Lewis and J. Rinzel, Dynamics of spiking neurons connected by both inhibitory and electrical coupling, J. Comput. Neurosci., 14 (2003), pp. 283–309.
[36] Y.-X. Li, Y.Q. Wang, and R. Miura, Clustering in small networks of excitatory neurons with heterogeous coupling strengths, J. Comput. Neurosci., 14 (2003), pp. 139–159.
[37] J.G. Mancilla, T. Lewis, D. Pinto, J. Rinzel, and B.W. Connors, Synchronization of electrically coupled pairs of interneruons in neocortex, J. Neurosci., 27 (2007), pp. 2058–2073.
[38] S.K. Maran and C.C. Canavier, Using phase resetting to predict 1:1 and 2:2 locking in two neuron networks in which firing order in not always preserved, J. Comput. Neurosci., 24 (2008), pp. 37–55.
[39] S.M. Moenter, A. Caraty, and F.J. Karsch, The estradiol-induced surge of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the ewe, Endocrinology, 127 (1990), pp. 1375–1384.
[40] S.M. Moenter, A. Caraty, A. Locatelli, and F.J. Karsch, Pattern of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion leading up to ovulation in the ewe: Existence of a preovulatory GnRH surge, Endocrinology, 129 (1991), pp. 1175–1182.
[41] M. Nishihara, Y. Takeuchi, T. Tanaka, and Y. Mori, Electrophysiological correlates of pulsatile and surge gonadotrophin secretion, Rev. Reprod., 4 (1999), pp. 110–116.
[42] M. Oh and V. Matveev, Loss of phase-locking in non-weakly coupled inhibitory networks of type-I model neurons, J. Comput. Neuro., 26 (2009), pp. 303–320.
[43] Y. Park and B. Ermentrout, Weakly coupled oscillators in a slowly varying world, J. Comput. Neurosci., 40 (2016), pp. 269–281. · Zbl 1382.93017
[44] B. Pfeuty, G. Mato, D. Golomb, and D. Hansel, Electrical synapses and synchrony: The role of intrinsic currents, J. Neurosci., 23 (2003), pp. 6280–6294.
[45] A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001. · Zbl 0993.37002
[46] V. Prévot, N.K. Hanchate, N. Bellefontaine, A. Sharif, J. Parkash, C. Estrella, C. Allet, S. de Seranno, C. Campagne, X. d’Anglemont de Tassigny, and M. Baroncini, Function-related structural plasticity of the GnRH system: A role for neuronal-glial-endothelial interactions, Front. Neuroendocrinol., 31 (2010), pp. 241–258.
[47] J. Qiu, Nestor C.C., Zhang C., S.L. Padilla, R.D. Palmiter, Kelly M.J., and O.K. Rønnekleiv, High-frequency stimulation-induced peptide release synchronizes arcuate kisspeptin neurons and excites GnRH neurons, Elife, 23 (2013), e16246.
[48] N.W. Schulthesis, A.A. Prinz, and R.J. Butera, eds., Phase Response Curves in Neuroscience: Theory, Experiment, and Analysis, Springer Ser. Comput. Neurosci. 6, Springer, New York, 2012.
[49] I.B. Schwartz and T. Erneux, Subharmonic hysteresis and period doubling bifurcations for a periodically driven laser, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 54 (1994), pp. 1083–1100. · Zbl 0809.34054
[50] A. Sharif, M. Baroncini, and V. Prevot, Role of glia in the regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuronal activity and secretion, Neuroendocrinology, 98 (2013), pp. 1–15.
[51] A. Sherman, Anti-phase, asymmetric and aperiodic oscillations in excitable cells–I. Coupled bursters, Bull. Math. Biol., 56 (1994), pp. 811–835. · Zbl 0803.92008
[52] D. Somers and N. Kopell, Rapid synchronization through fast threshold modulation, Biol. Cybernet., 68 (1993), pp. 393–407.
[53] D. Terman, N. Kopell, and A. Bose, Dynamics of two mutually coupled slow inhibitory neurons, Phys. D, 117 (1998), pp. 241–275. · Zbl 0941.34027
[54] D. Terman and E. Lee, Partial synchronization in a network of neural oscillators, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 57 (1997), pp. 252–293. · Zbl 0869.34032
[55] D. Terman, E. Lee, J. Rinzel, and T. Bem, Stability of anti-phase and in-phase locking by electrical coupling but not fast inhibition alone, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 10 (2011), pp. 1127–1153. · Zbl 1244.34065
[56] C. van Vreeswijk, L. Abbot, and B. Ermentrout, When inhibition not excitation synchronizes neural firing, J. Comput. Neurosci., 1 (1994), pp. 313–321.
[57] A. Vidal and F. Clément, A dynamical model for the control of the gonadotrophin releasing hormone neurosecretory system, J. Neuroendocrinol., 22 (2010), pp. 1251–1266.
[58] J.A. White, C.C. Chow, J. Ritt, C. Soto-Trevino, and N. Kopell, Synchronization and oscillatory dynamics in heterogenous, mutually inhibited neurons, J. Comput. Neurosci., 5 (1998), pp. 5–16. · Zbl 0896.92010
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.