×

String cosmology – large-field inflation in string theory. (English) Zbl 1314.83007

Summary: This is a short review of string cosmology. We wish to connect string-scale physics as closely as possible to observables accessible to current or near-future experiments. Our possible best hope to do so is a description of inflation in string theory. The energy scale of inflation can be as high as that of Grand Unification (GUT). If this is the case, this is the closest we can possibly get in energy scales to string-scale physics. Hence, GUT-scale inflation may be our best candidate phenomenon to preserve traces of string-scale dynamics. Our chance to look for such traces is the primordial gravitational wave, or tensor mode signal produced during inflation. For GUT-scale inflation this is strong enough to be potentially visible as a B-mode polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Moreover, a GUT-scale inflation model has a trans-Planckian excursion of the inflaton scalar field during the observable amount of inflation. Such large-field models of inflation have a clear need for symmetry protection against quantum corrections. This makes them ideal candidates for a description in a candidate fundamental theory like string theory. At the same time the need of large-field inflation models for UV completion makes them particularly susceptible to preserve imprints of their string-scale dynamics in the inflationary observables, the spectral index \(n_{s}\) and the fractional tensor mode power \(r\). Hence, we will focus this review on axion monodromy inflation as a mechanism of large-field inflation in string theory.

MSC:

83-02 Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to relativity and gravitational theory
83E30 String and superstring theories in gravitational theory
83F05 Relativistic cosmology
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI arXiv

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.151301 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.151301
[2] DOI: 10.1002/prop.200310123 · Zbl 1040.81075 · doi:10.1002/prop.200310123
[3] DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/23/21/S01 · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/21/S01
[4] DOI: 10.1086/320638 · doi:10.1086/320638
[5] DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/119 · doi:10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/119
[6] DOI: 10.1086/300499 · doi:10.1086/300499
[7] DOI: 10.1086/307221 · Zbl 1368.85002 · doi:10.1086/307221
[8] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347 · Zbl 1371.83202 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347
[9] DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-X · Zbl 1371.83222 · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-X
[10] DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9 · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9
[11] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1220 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1220
[12] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101
[13] DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.008 · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.008
[14] DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.733 · Zbl 1205.81011 · doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.79.733
[15] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.046005 · Zbl 1244.83036 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.046005
[16] DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2005/03/007 · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/03/007
[17] DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2012)163 · Zbl 1397.83201 · doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2012)163
[18] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.046003 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.046003
[19] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.121301 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.121301
[20] DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2005/01/005 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2005/01/005
[21] DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2014.08.045 · Zbl 1317.83107 · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.08.045
[22] DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2003/10/013 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/10/013
[23] DOI: 10.1146/annurev.nucl.010909.083524 · doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.010909.083524
[24] DOI: 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00603-6 · Zbl 0992.83096 · doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00603-6
[25] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123505 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123505
[26] Mukhanov V. F., JETP Lett. 33 pp 532– (1981)
[27] DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/013 · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/013
[28] DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/014 · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/014
[29] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1861 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1861
[30] DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7 · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7
[31] DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/03/023 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/03/023
[32] DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(80)90103-3 · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90103-3
[33] Linde A. D., Contemp. Concepts Phys. 5 pp 1– (1990)
[34] DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2015)127 · Zbl 1388.83674 · doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)127
[35] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.026011 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.026011
[36] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.24.3082 · Zbl 1267.83043 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.24.3082
[37] DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2013)009 · Zbl 1342.83152 · doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)009
[38] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.126011 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.126011
[39] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.3233 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.3233
[40] DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/30/21/214002 · Zbl 1277.83008 · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/21/214002
[41] DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2003/06/001 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/06/001
[42] DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/06/009 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/06/009
[43] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.023506 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.023506
[44] DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2014)155 · Zbl 06564671 · doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014)155
[45] DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/003 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/003
[46] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.126007 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.126007
[47] DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2006/05/018 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2006/05/018
[48] DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2014)074 · Zbl 06565187 · doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)074
[49] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.103535 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.103535
[50] DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/048 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/048
[51] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.106006 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.106006
[52] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.106006 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.106006
[53] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.104035 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.104035
[54] DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2004/05/072 · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/05/072
[55] DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.08.005 · Zbl 1123.81393 · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.08.005
[56] DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/060 · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/060
[57] DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/01/052 · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/01/052
[58] DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/105 · Zbl 1245.81155 · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/105
[59] Burgess C., JHEP 0310 pp 056– (2003)
[60] DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2012)019 · Zbl 1397.81228 · doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2012)019
[61] DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/007 · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/007
[62] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.191601 · Zbl 1228.81219 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.191601
[63] DOI: 10.1063/1.1848341 · doi:10.1063/1.1848341
[64] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.086003 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.086003
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.