zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Automating the transformation-based analysis of visual languages. (English) Zbl 1213.68412
Summary: We present a novel approach for the automatic generation of model-to-model transformations given a description of the operational semantics of the source language in the form of graph transformation rules. The approach is geared to the generation of transformations from Domain-Specific Visual Languages (DSVLs) into semantic domains with an explicit notion of transition, like for example Petri nets. The generated transformation is expressed in the form of operational triple graph grammar rules that transform the static information (initial model) and the dynamics (source rules and their execution control structure). We illustrate these techniques with a DSVL in the domain of production systems, for which we generate a transformation into Petri nets. We also tackle the description of timing aspects in graph transformation rules, and its analysis through their automatic translation into Time Petri nets.

68Q85 Models and methods for concurrent and distributed computing (process algebras, bisimulation, transition nets, etc.)
AGG; Romeo
Full Text: DOI
[1] AGG home page at http://tfs.cs.tu-berlin.de/agg/
[2] Ajmone Marsan A, Balbo G, Conte G, Donatelli S, Franceschinis G (1995) Modelling with generalised stochastic Petri nets. Wiley Series in Parallel Computing. Wiley? New York · Zbl 0843.68080
[3] André C, Mallet F, Peraldi-Frati M-A (2007) Multiform time in UML for real-time embedded applications. In: Proceedings of 13th IEEE international conference on embedded and real-time computing systems and applications, pp 232–240
[4] Bengtsson J, Yi W (2004) Timed automata: semantics, algorithms and tools. In: Proceedings of ACPN 2003. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3098. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 87–124 · Zbl 1088.68119
[5] Berthomieu B, Diaz M (1991) Modeling and verification of time dependent systems using time Petri nets. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 17(3): 259–273 · Zbl 05113493 · doi:10.1109/32.75415
[6] Bézivin J, Büttner F, Gogolla M, Jouault F, Kurtev I, Lindow A (2006) Model transformations? Transformation models! In: Proceedings MoDELS’06. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4199. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 440–453
[7] Boyer M, Diaz M (2001) Multiple enabledness of transitions in Petri Nets with time. In: Proceedings of ninth IEEE international workshop on Petri nets and performance models (PNPM’01), pp 219–228
[8] Cerone A, Maggiolo-Schettini A (1999) Time-based expressivity of time Petri nets for system specification. Theor Comput Sci 216: 1–53 · Zbl 0914.68145 · doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(98)00008-5
[9] Ehrig H, Engels G, Kreowski H-J, Rozenberg G (1999) Handbook of graph grammars and computing by graph transformation, vol 1. World Scientific, Mountain View · Zbl 0998.68001
[10] Ehrig H, Ehrig K, Prange U, Taentzer G (2006) Fundamentals of algebraic graph transformation. Springer, Heidelberg · Zbl 1095.68047
[11] Ehrig H, Ermel C (2008) Semantical correctness and completeness of model transformations using graph and rule transformation. In: Proceedings of ICGT’08. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5214. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 194–210 · Zbl 1175.68221
[12] Ermel C, Ehrig K (2007) Simulation and analysis of reconfigurable systems. In: Proceedings of AGTIVE’07, pp 261–276
[13] Gardey G, Lime D, Magnin M, Roux OH (2005) Romeo: a tool for analyzing time Petri Nets. In: Proceedings of computer aided verification. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3576, pp 418–423 · Zbl 1081.68618
[14] Ghezzi C, Mandrioli D, Morasca S, Pezzé M (1991) A unified high-level petri net formalism for time-critical systems. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 17(2): 160–172 · Zbl 05113339 · doi:10.1109/32.67597
[15] Guerra E, de Lara J (2007) Event-driven grammars: relating abstract and concrete levels of Visual Languages. SoSyM 6(3): 317–347 · Zbl 05188602 · doi:10.1007/s10270-007-0051-2
[16] Guerra E, de Lara J, Malizia A, Díaz P (2009) Supporting user-oriented analysis for multi-view domain-specific visual languages. Inf Softw Technol 51(4): 769–784 · Zbl 05852618 · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.005
[17] Gyapay S, Heckel R, Varró D (2002) Graph transformation with time: causality and logical clocks. In: Proceedings of ICGT’02. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2505. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 120–134 · Zbl 1028.68560
[18] Heckel R, Küster JM, Taentzer G (2002) Confluence of typed attributed graph transformation systems. In: Proceedings of ICGT’02, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2505. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 161–176 · Zbl 1028.68031
[19] Heckel R (2005) Stochastic analysis of graph transformation systems: a case study in P2P Networks. In: Proceedings of ICTAC’05. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3722, pp 53–69 · Zbl 1169.68451
[20] Holliday MA, Vernon MK (1987) A generalized times Petri net model for performance analysis. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 13(12): 1297–1310 · Zbl 05342049 · doi:10.1109/TSE.1987.233141
[21] Kappel G, Kargl H, Reiter T, Retschitzegger W, Schwinger W, Strommer M, Wimmer M (2008) A framework for building mapping operators resolving structural heterogeneities. In: Proceedings of UNISCON 2008, Lecture notes in business information processing, vol 5. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 158–174
[22] Kelly S, Tolvanen JP (2008) Domain-specific modeling: enabling full code generation. Wiley–IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos
[23] Lambers L, Ehrig H, Orejas F (2006) Conflict detection for graph transformation with negative application conditions. In: Proceedings of ICGT’06, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4178, pp 61–76 · Zbl 1156.68431
[24] de Lara J, Vangheluwe H (2004) Defining visual notations and their manipulation through meta-modelling and graph transformation. J Visual Lang Comput 15(3–4): 309–330 · Zbl 05696071 · doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2004.01.005
[25] de Lara J, Bardohl R, Ehrig H, Ehrig K, Prange U, Taentzer G (2007) Attributed graph transformation with node type inheritance. Theor Comput Sci 376(3): 139–163 · Zbl 1116.68042 · doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2007.02.001
[26] de Lara J, Guerra E (2008) Pattern-based model-to-model transformation. In: Proceedings ICGT’2008. Lecture notes computer science, vol 5214, pp 426–441 · Zbl 1175.68114
[27] de Lara J, Vangheluwe H (2008) Translating model simulators to analysis models. In: Proceedings of FASE 2008, Lecture notes computer science, vol 4961. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 77–92
[28] Llorens M, Oliver J (2004) Structural and dynamic changes in concurrent systems: reconfigurable Petri nets. IEEE Trans Comput 53(9): 1147–1158 · Zbl 05105492 · doi:10.1109/TC.2004.66
[29] Marriott K, Meyer B, Wittenburg K (1998) A survey of visual language specification and recognition Theory of Visual Languages. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 5–85 · Zbl 0933.68075
[30] Mellor S, Scott K, Uhl A, Weise D (2004) MDA distilled: principles of model-driven architecture. Addison–Wesley, Reading
[31] Merlin P (1974) A study of the recoverability of computer systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Irvine
[32] Murata T (1989) Petri nets: properties, analysis and applications. In: Proc IEEE 77(4): 541–580 · doi:10.1109/5.24143
[33] Peterson JL (1981) Petri net theory and the modelling of systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs · Zbl 0461.68059
[34] Ramchandani C (1974) Analysis of asynchronous concurrent systems by timed Petri nets. Project MAC, TR 120, Massachussets Institute of Technology
[35] Schürr A (1994) Specification of graph translators with triple graph grammars. In: Proceedings of WG’94. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 903. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 151–163
[36] Syriani E, Vangheluwe H (2008) Programmed graph rewriting with time for simulation-based design. In: Proceedings of ICMT 2008. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5063. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 91–106
[37] Taentzer G, Rensink A (2005) Ensuring structural constraints in graph-based models with type inheritance. In: Proceedings of FASE 2005, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3442, pp 64–79 · Zbl 1119.68365
[38] UML 2.1.2 infrastructure and superstructure specification (2007). http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.1.2/
[39] UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance, and Time Specification v 1.1(2005). http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/schedulability.htm
[40] Home page of UPPAAL. http://www.uppaal.com
[41] Varro D (2006) Model transformation by example. In: Proceedings of MoDELS’06, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4199. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 410–424
[42] Varro D, Varro-Gyapay S, Ehrig H, Prange U, Taentzer G (2006) Termination analysis of model transformations by Petri nets. In: Proceedings of ICGT’06. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4178. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 260–274 · Zbl 1156.68501
[43] Wang J, Xu G (2000) Reachability Analysis of real-time systems using time Petri nets. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 30(5): 725–736 · doi:10.1109/3477.875448
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.