×

The consumption-investment decision of a prospect theory household: a two-period model. (English) Zbl 1395.91408

Summary: This study extends the literature on portfolio choice under prospect theory preferences by introducing a two-period life cycle model, where the sufficiently loss averse household decides on optimal consumption and investment in a portfolio with one risk-free and one risky asset. The optimal solution depends primarily on whether the household’s present value of the consumption reference levels is below, equal to, or above the present value of its endowment income. Reference levels below the endowment income are associated with the self-enhancement motive. In this case, the household avoids relative losses in consumption in any present or future state of nature (good or bad). As a result the degree of loss aversion does not directly affect optimal consumption and risk taking activity. Reference levels equal to the endowment income are associated with the belonging motive. An example would be a household comparing to others that belong to the same social class. In this case the household’s optimal consumption is the reference consumption and the household will not invest in the risky asset. Finally, reference levels above the endowment income are associated with the self-improvement motive (or high aspirations). For such high reference levels, households cannot avoid experiencing a relative loss in consumption, either now or in the future. As a result, loss aversion directly affects consumption and risky investment.

MSC:

91G10 Portfolio theory
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Abel, A., Asset prices under habit formation and catching up with the Joneses, Amer. Econ. Rev., 80, 38-42 (1990)
[2] Achury, C.; Hubar, S.; Koulovatianos, C., Saving rates and portfolio choice with subsistence consumption, Rev. Econ. Dynam., 15, 108-126 (2012)
[3] Ahsan, S. M.; Tsigaris, P., The efficiency loss of capital income taxation under imperfect loss offset provisions, Public Finance Rev., 37, 710-731 (2009)
[4] Banaji, M. R.; Prentice, D. A., The self in social contexts, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 45, 297-332 (1994)
[5] Barberis, N., Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A review and assessment, J. Econ. Perspect., 27, 173-196 (2013)
[6] Barberis, N.; Huang, M., Mental accounting, loss aversion and individual stock returns, J. Finance, 56, 1247-1292 (2001)
[7] Barberis, N.; Huang, M.; Santos, T., Prospect theory and asset prices, Q. J. Econom., 116, 1-153 (2001) · Zbl 0979.91025
[8] Barberis, N.; Xiong, W., What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation, Quart. J. Econ., 116, 1-53 (2009)
[9] Berkelaar, A.; Kouwenberg, R.; Post, T., Optimal portfolio choice under loss aversion, Rev. Econ. Stat., 86, 973-987 (2004)
[10] Bernard, C.; Ghossoub, M., Static portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory, Math. Financ. Econ., 2, 277-306 (2010) · Zbl 1255.91389
[11] Boldrin, M.; Christiano, L.; Fisher, J., Habit persistence, asset returns, and the business cycle, Amer. Econ. Rev., 91, 149-166 (2001)
[12] Bowman, D.; Minehart, D.; Rabin, M., Loss aversion in a consumption-savings model, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 38, 155-178 (1999)
[13] Campbell, J.; Cochrane, J. H., By force of habit: A consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior, J. Polit. Econ., 107, 205-251 (1999)
[14] Christiano, L.; Eichenbaum, M.; Evans, C., Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy, J. Polit. Econ., 113, 1-45 (2005)
[15] Clark, A. E.; Frijters, P.; Shields, M. A., Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles, J. Econ. Lit., 46, 95-144 (2008)
[16] Constantinides, G. M., Habit formation: A resolution of the equity premium puzzle, J. Polit. Econ., 98, 531-552 (1990)
[17] DellaVigna, S., Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field, J. Econ. Lit., 47, 315-372 (2009)
[18] Falk, A.; Knell, M., Choosing the Joneses: Endogenous goals and reference standards, Scand. J. Econ., 106, 417-435 (2004)
[19] Festinger, L., A theory of social comparison processes, Hum. Relat., 7, 117-140 (1954)
[20] Fortin, I.; Hlouskova, J., Optimal asset allocation under linear loss aversion, J. Bank. Finance, 35, 2974-2990 (2011)
[21] Fortin, I.; Hlouskova, J., Downside loss aversion: Winner or loser?, Math. Methods Oper. Res., 81, 181-233 (2015) · Zbl 1320.91134
[22] Fortin, I.; Hlouskova, J.; Tsigaris, P., Two-Period Model for Consumption-Investment Decision with a Prospect Theory Household (2015), mimeo
[23] Gaertner, L.; Sedikides, C.; Cai, H., Wanting to be great and better but not average on the pancultural desire for self-enhancing and self-improving feedback, J. Cross-Cult. Psychol., 43, 521-526 (2012)
[24] Geary, R. C., A constant utility index of the cost of living, Rev. Econom. Stud., 18, 65-66 (1951)
[25] Gomes, F. J., Portfolio choice and trading volume with loss-averse investors, J. Bus., 78, 675-706 (2005)
[26] He, X. D.; Zhou, X. Y., Portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory: An analytical treatment, Manage. Sci., 57, 315-331 (2011) · Zbl 1214.91099
[27] Hlouskova, J.; Tsigaris, P., Capital income taxation and risk taking under prospect theory, Int. Tax Public Financ., 19, 554-573 (2012)
[29] Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A., Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47, 363-391 (1979)
[30] Koszegi, B.; Rabin, M., A model of reference-dependent preferences, Quart. J. Econ., 121, 1133-1165 (2006) · Zbl 1179.91059
[31] Lettau, M.; Uhlig, H., Can habit formation be reconciled with business cycle facts?, Rev. Econ. Dynam., 3, 79-99 (2000)
[32] Merton, R. C., Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous time case, Rev. Econ. Stat., 50, 247-257 (1969)
[33] Merton, R. C., Optimum consumptio and portfolio rules in a continuous time model, J. Econom. Theory, 3, 373-413 (1971) · Zbl 1011.91502
[34] Sandmo, A., Portfolio choice in a theory of saving, Swed. J. Econ., 70, 106-122 (1968)
[35] Sandmo, A., Capital risk, consumption, and portfolio choice, Econometrica, 37, 586-599 (1969)
[36] Sedikides, C.; Gregg, A. P., Self-enhancement: Food for thought, Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 3, 102-116 (2008)
[37] Stone, R., Linear expenditure systems and demand analysis: An application to the pattern of British demand, Econ. J., 64, 511-527 (1954)
[38] Taylor, S.; Brown, J., Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health, Psychol. Bull., 103, 193-210 (1988)
[39] Taylor, S.; Lerner, J.; Sherman, D.; Sage, R.; McDowell, N., Are self-enhancing cognitions associated with healthy or unhealthy biological profiles?, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 85, 605-615 (2003)
[40] Tversky, A.; Kahneman, D., Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty, J. Risk Uncertain., 5, 297-323 (1992) · Zbl 0775.90106
[42] Wood, J. V., Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes, Psychol. Bull., 106, 231-248 (1989)
[43] Yu, X., Utility maximization with addictive consumption habit formation in incomplete smimartingale markets, Ann. Appl. Probab., 25, 1383-1419 (2015) · Zbl 1312.91084
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.