×

A novel iterative penalty method to enforce boundary conditions in finite volume POD-Galerkin reduced order models for fluid dynamics problems. (English) Zbl 1473.65144

Summary: A Finite-Volume based POD-Galerkin reduced order model is developed for fluid dynamics problems where the (time-dependent) boundary conditions are controlled using two different boundary control strategies: the lifting function method, whose aim is to obtain homogeneous basis functions for the reduced basis space and the penalty method where the boundary conditions are enforced in the reduced order model using a penalty factor. The penalty method is improved by using an iterative solver for the determination of the penalty factor rather than tuning the factor with a sensitivity analysis or numerical experimentation.
The boundary control methods are compared and tested for two cases: the classical lid driven cavity benchmark problem and a Y-junction flow case with two inlet channels and one outlet channel. The results show that the boundaries of the reduced order model can be controlled with the boundary control methods and the same order of accuracy is achieved for the velocity and pressure fields. Finally, the reduced order models are 270–308 times faster than the full order models for the lid driven cavity test case and 13–24 times for the Y-junction test case.

MSC:

65M08 Finite volume methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs
35Q35 PDEs in connection with fluid mechanics
65M22 Numerical solution of discretized equations for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs
76D05 Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible viscous fluids
76M12 Finite volume methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics

Software:

OpenFOAM; ITHACA-FV
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI arXiv

References:

[1] A. Sartori, A. Cammi, L. Luzzi, and G. Rozza, Reduced basis approaches in time-dependent non-coercive settings for modelling the movement of nuclear reactor control rods, Commu-nications in Computational Physics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 23-59, 2016. · Zbl 1388.65106
[2] S. S. Ravindran, A reduced-order approach for optimal control of fluids using proper or-thogonal decomposition, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 425-448, 2000. · Zbl 1005.76020
[3] G. Rozza, D. B. P. Huynh, and A. T. Patera, Reduced basis approximation and a posteri-ori error estimation for affinely parametrized elliptic coercive partial differential equations, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 1, 2008. · Zbl 1304.65251
[4] K. Veroy, C. Prud’Homme, and A. T. Patera, Reduced-basis approximation of the vis-cous Burgers equation: Rigorous a posteriori error bounds, Comptes Rendus Mathematique, vol. 337, no. 9, pp. 619-624, 2003. · Zbl 1036.65075
[5] J. Hesthaven, G. Rozza, and B. Stamm, Certified Reduced Basis Methods for Parametrized Partial Differential Equations. Springer International Publishing, 1st ed., 2016. · Zbl 1329.65203
[6] A. Quarteroni, A. Manzoni, and F. Negri, Reduced Basis Methods for Partial Differential Equa-tions: An Introduction, vol. 92. Springer, 2015. · Zbl 1337.65113
[7] P. Benner, S. Gugercin, and K. Willcox, A survey of projection-based model reduction meth-ods for parametric dynamical systems, SIAM Review, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 483-531, 2015. · Zbl 1339.37089
[8] G. Bandini, M. Polidori, A. Gerschenfeld, D. Pialla, S. Li, W. Ma, P. Kudinov, M. Jeltsov, K. Kööp, K. Huber, et al., Assessment of systems codes and their coupling with CFD codes in thermal-hydraulic applications to innovative reactors, Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 281, pp. 22-38, 2015.
[9] A. Toti, J. Vierendeels, and F. Belloni, Coupled system thermal-hydraulic/CFD analysis of a protected loss of flow transient in the MYRRHA reactor, Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 118, pp. 199-211, 2018.
[10] A. Petruzzi and F. D’Auria, Thermal-hydraulic system codes in nuclear reactor safety and qualification procedures, Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2008, 2008.
[11] R. Eymard, T. Gallouët, and R. Herbin, Finite volume methods, Handbook of Numerical Anal-ysis, vol. 7, pp. 713-1018, 2000. · Zbl 0981.65095
[12] H. K. Versteeg and W. Malalasekera, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method. Pearson Education, 2007.
[13] C. Fletcher, Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics Vol. I. Fundamental and General Tech-niques. Springer-Verlag, 2nd ed., 1991. · Zbl 0717.76001
[14] S. Lorenzi, A. Cammi, L. Luzzi, and G. Rozza, POD-Galerkin method for finite volume ap-proximation of Navier-Stokes and RANS equations, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 311, pp. 151-179, 2016. · Zbl 1439.76112
[15] W. Graham, J. Peraire, and K. Tang, Optimal control of vortex shedding using low-order models. Part I -Open-loop model development, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 945-972, 1999. · Zbl 0955.76026
[16] I. Kalashnikova and M. Barone, Efficient non-linear proper orthogonal decomposi-tion/Galerkin reduced order models with stable penalty enforcement of boundary condi-tions, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 1337-1362, 2012. · Zbl 1242.76239
[17] G. Stabile, S. Hijazi, A. Mola, S. Lorenzi, and G. Rozza, POD-Galerkin reduced order meth-ods for CFD using Finite Volume Discretisation: Vortex shedding around a circular cylinder, Communications in Applied and Industrial Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 210-236, 2017. · Zbl 1383.35175
[18] S. Sirisup and G. Karniadakis, Stability and accuracy of periodic flow solutions obtained by a POD-penalty method, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 202, no. 3-4, pp. 218-237, 2005. · Zbl 1070.35024
[19] T. Lassila, A. Manzoni, A. Quarteroni, and G. Rozza, Model order reduction in fluid dynam-ics: Challenges and perspectives, in Reduced Order Methods for Modeling and Computational Reduction, pp. 235-273, Berlin: Springer, 2014. · Zbl 1395.76058
[20] G. Rozza and K. Veroy, On the stability of the reduced basis method for Stokes equations in parametrized domains, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 196, no. 7, pp. 1244-1260, 2007. · Zbl 1173.76352
[21] A. Caiazzo, T. Iliescu, V. John, and S. Schyschlowa, A numerical investigation of velocity-pressure reduced order models for incompressible flows, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 259, pp. 598-616, 2014. · Zbl 1349.76050
[22] I. Akhtar, A. H. Nayfeh, and C. J. Ribbens, On the stability and extension of reduced-order Galerkin models in incompressible flows, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 213-237, 2009. · Zbl 1234.76040
[23] M. Bergmann, C.-H. Bruneau, and A. Iollo, Enablers for robust POD models, Journal of Com-putational Physics, vol. 228, no. 2, pp. 516-538, 2009. · Zbl 1409.76099
[24] B. R. Noack, P. Papas, and P. A. Monkewitz, The need for a pressure-term representation in empirical Galerkin models of incompressible shear flows, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 523, p. 339, 2005. · Zbl 1065.76102
[25] G. Stabile and G. Rozza, Finite volume POD-Galerkin stabilised reduced order methods for the parametrised incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, Computers & Fluids, vol. 173, pp. 273-284, 2018. · Zbl 1410.76264
[26] J. Baiges, R. Codina, and S. R. Idelsohn, Reduced-order modelling strategies for the finite element approximation of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, in Numerical Simula-tions of Coupled Problems in Engineering, pp. 189-216, Springer, 2014.
[27] M. Yano, A space-time Petrov-Galerkin certified reduced basis method: Application to the Boussinesq equations, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. A232-A266, 2014. · Zbl 1288.35275
[28] F. Moukalled, L. Mangani, M. Darwish, et al., The finite volume method in computational fluid dynamics, An Advanced Introduction with OpenFOAM and Matlab, pp. 3-8, 2016. · Zbl 1329.76001
[29] J.-G. Liu, J. Liu, and R. L. Pego, Stable and accurate pressure approximation for unsteady incompressible viscous flow, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 229, no. 9, pp. 3428-3453, 2010. · Zbl 1307.76029
[30] J. H. Ferziger and M. Perić, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, vol. 3. Springer, 2002. · Zbl 0869.76003
[31] S. V. Patankar and D. B. Spalding, A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows, in Numerical Prediction of Flow, Heat Transfer, Turbulence and Combustion, pp. 54-73, Elsevier, 1983.
[32] R. I. Issa, Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 40-65, 1986. · Zbl 0619.76024
[33] F. Chinesta, P. Ladeveze, and E. Cueto, A short review on model order reduction based on proper generalized decomposition, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 395, 2011.
[34] S. Busto, G. Stabile, G. Rozza, and M. E. Vázquez-Cendón, POD-Galerkin reduced order methods for combined Navier-Stokes transport equations based on a hybrid FV-FE solver, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 256-273, 2020. · Zbl 1443.65196
[35] A. Quarteroni and G. Rozza, Reduced Order Methods for Modeling and Computational Reduction, vol. 9 of MS&A. Springer, 1st ed., 2014. · Zbl 1280.65004
[36] L. Sirovich, Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 561-571, 1987. · Zbl 0676.76047
[37] S. Georgaka, G. Stabile, G. Rozza, and M. J. Bluck, Parametric POD-Galerkin model order re-duction for unsteady-state heat transfer problems, Communications in Computational Physics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1-32, 2018. · Zbl 1473.78016
[38] A. Quarteroni and G. Rozza, Numerical solution of parametrized Navier-Stokes equations by reduced basis methods, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations: An Interna-tional Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 923-948, 2007. · Zbl 1178.76238
[39] D. Xiao, F. Fang, A. G. Buchan, C. C. Pain, I. M. Navon, J. Du, and G. Hu, Non-linear model reduction for the Navier-Stokes equations using residual DEIM method, Journal of Compu-tational Physics, vol. 263, pp. 1-18, 2014. · Zbl 1349.76288
[40] M. Barrault, Y. Maday, N. C. Nguyen, and A. T. Patera, An ’empirical interpolation’ method: Application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations, Comptes Rendus Mathematique, vol. 339, pp. 667-672, Nov. 2004. · Zbl 1061.65118
[41] K. Carlberg, C. Farhat, J. Cortial, and D. Amsallem, The GNAT method for nonlinear model reduction: Effective implementation and application to computational fluid dynamics and turbulent flows, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 242, pp. 623-647, 2013. · Zbl 1299.76180
[42] L. Chirco, A. Chierici, R. Da Vià, V. Giovacchini, and S. Manservisi, Optimal Control of the Wilcox turbulence model with lifting functions for flow injection and boundary control, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1224, no. 1, p. 012006, 2019.
[43] L. Demkowicz, Computing with hp-adaptive Finite Elements, Volume 1: One and Two Dimensional Elliptic and Maxwell Problems. CRC Press, 2006.
[44] G. Bornia, M. Gunzburger, and S. Manservisi, A distributed control approach for the bound-ary optimal control of the steady MHD equations, Communications in Computational Physics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 722-752, 2013. · Zbl 1373.76339
[45] S. Ullmann, POD-Galerkin modeling for incompressible flows with stochastic boundary conditions. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 2014. · Zbl 1291.76004
[46] L. Fick, Y. Maday, A. T. Patera, and T. Taddei, A stabilized POD model for turbulent flows over a range of Reynolds numbers: Optimal parameter sampling and constrained projection, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 371, pp. 214-243, 2018. · Zbl 1415.76387
[47] I. Lasiecka, Ritz-Galerkin approximation of the time optimal boundary control problem for parabolic systems with Dirichlet boundary conditions, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimiza-tion, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 477-500, 1984. · Zbl 0549.49024
[48] M. D. Gunzburger, J. S. Peterson, and J. N. Shadid, Reduced-order modeling of time-dependent PDEs with multiple parameters in the boundary data, Computer Methods in Ap-plied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 196, no. 4-6, pp. 1030-1047, 2007. · Zbl 1121.65354
[49] J. Burkardt, M. Gunzburger, and H.-C. Lee, POD and CVT-based reduced-order modeling of Navier-Stokes flows, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 196, no. 1-3, pp. 337-355, 2006. · Zbl 1120.76323
[50] V. Girault and L. R. Scott, Analysis of a two-dimensional grade-two fluid model with a tangential boundary condition, Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 981-1011, 1999. · Zbl 0961.35116
[51] E. Fonn, H. van Brummelen, T. Kvamsdal, and A. Rasheed, Fast divergence-conforming re-duced basis methods for steady Navier-Stokes flow, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 346, pp. 486-512, 2019. · Zbl 1440.76059
[52] J. L. Eftang and E. M. Rønquist, Evaluation of flux integral outputs for the reduced basis method, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, vol. 20, no. 03, pp. 351-374, 2010. · Zbl 1194.35027
[53] S. Hijazi, G. Stabile, A. Mola, and G. Rozza, Non-intrusive polynomial chaos method applied to full-order and reduced problems in computational fluid dynamics: A comparison and perspectives, in Quantification of Uncertainty: Improving Efficiency and Technology, pp. 217-240, Springer, 2020. · Zbl 1455.62159
[54] J. Lions and E. Magenes, Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications, vol. 1. Springer, 1973. · Zbl 0251.35001
[55] I. Babuška, The finite element method with penalty, Mathematics of Computation, vol. 27, no. 122, pp. 221-228, 1973. · Zbl 0299.65057
[56] A. Placzek, D.-M. Tran, and R. Ohayon, Hybrid proper orthogonal decomposition formula-tion for linear structural dynamics, Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 318, no. 4-5, pp. 943-964, 2008.
[57] L. Hou and S. Ravindran, Numerical approximation of optimal flow control problems by a penalty method: Error estimates and numerical results, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1753-1777, 1999. · Zbl 0952.93036
[58] Y. Epshteyn and B. Rivière, Estimation of penalty parameters for symmetric interior penalty Galerkin methods, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 206, no. 2, pp. 843-872, 2007. · Zbl 1141.65078
[59] X. Dai, P. Tang, and M. Wu, Analysis of an iterative penalty method for Navier-Stokes equa-tions with nonlinear slip boundary conditions, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 403-413, 2013. · Zbl 1455.76081
[60] K. Bizon and G. Continillo, Reduced order modelling of chemical reactors with recycle by means of POD-penalty method, Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 39, pp. 22-32, 2012.
[61] H. J. Kelley, Method of gradients, in Mathematics in Science and Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 205-254, Elsevier, 1962.
[62] C. Huettel and A. Matzenmiller, Minimum penalty parameter for given constraint violation tolerance, in European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering -ECCOMAS 2000, 2000.
[63] G. Leitmann, Optimization Techniques: With Applications to Aerospace Systems, vol. 5. Academic Press, 1962. · Zbl 0133.05602
[64] B. Nour-Omid and P. Wriggers, A note on the optimum choice for penalty parameters, Com-munications in Applied Numerical Methods, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 581-585, 1987. · Zbl 0623.73108
[65] H. Jasak, A. Jemcov, andẐ. Tuković, OpenFOAM: A C++ library for complex physics simulations, International Workshop on Coupled Methods in Numerical Dynamics, IUC, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2007.
[66] G. Stabile and G. Rozza, ITHACA-FV -In real Time Highly Advanced Computational Ap-plications for Finite Volumes. www.mathlab.sissa.it/ithaca-fv. Accessed 2020-10-16.
[67] D. Stephenson, Creating openFOAM meshes with Gmsh. https://www.micronanoflows.ac.uk/ creating-openfoam-meshes-with-gmsh/, 2015. Accessed 2019-08-22.
[68] K. Kean and M. Schneier, Error analysis of supremizer pressure recovery for POD based reduced-order models of the time-dependent Navier-Stokes equations, SIAM Journal on Nu-merical Analysis, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 2235-2264, 2020. · Zbl 1447.65080
[69] F. Ballarin, A. Manzoni, A. Quarteroni, and G. Rozza, Supremizer stabilization of POD-Galerkin approximation of parametrized steady incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 1136-1161, 2015. · Zbl 1352.76039
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.