×

Identifying the time of change in the mean of a two-stage nested process. (English) Zbl 1514.62355

Summary: Statistical process control charts are used to distinguish between common cause and special cause sources of variability. Once a control chart signals, a search to find the special cause should be initiated. If process analysts had knowledge of the change point, the search to find the special cause could be easily facilitated. Relevant literature contains an array of solutions to the change-point problem; however, these solutions are most appropriate when the samples are assumed to be independent. Unfortunately, the assumption of independence is often violated in practice. This work considers one such case of non-independence that frequently occurs in practice as a result of multi-stage sampling. Due to its commonality in practice, we assume a two-stage nested random model as the underlying process model and derive and evaluate a maximum-likelihood estimator for the change point in the fixed-effects component of this model. The estimator is applied to electron microscopy data obtained following a genuine control chart signal and from a real machining process where the important quality characteristic is the size of the surface grains produced by the machining operation. We conduct a simulation study to compare relative performances between the proposed change-point estimator and a commonly used alternative developed under the assumption of independent observations. The results suggest that both estimators are approximately unbiased; however, the proposed estimator yields smaller variance. The implication is that the proposed estimator is more precise, and thus, the quality of the estimator is improved relative to the alternative.

MSC:

62P30 Applications of statistics in engineering and industry; control charts
62J10 Analysis of variance and covariance (ANOVA)
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Anderson, R. L. and Crump, P. P. 1967. Comparisons of designs and estimation procedures in a two-stage nested processes. Technometrics, 9: 499-516.
[2] Box, G. E.P., Jenkins, G. M. and Reinsel, G. C. 1994. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, New Jersey: Prentice. · Zbl 0858.62072
[3] Corbeil, R. R. and Searle, S. R. 1976. Restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation of variance components in the mixed model. Technometrics, 18: 31-38. · Zbl 0324.62047
[4] Fahmy, H. M. and Elsayed, E. A. 2006. Drift time detection and adjustment procedures for processes subject to linear trend. Int. J. Prod. Res., 44: 3257-3278. · Zbl 1160.90389
[5] Harville, D. A. 1977. Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 72: 320-338. · Zbl 0373.62040
[6] Hocking, R. R. 2003. Methods and Applications of Linear Models: Regression and the Analysis of Variance, New York: John Wiley & Sons. · Zbl 1038.62059 · doi:10.1002/0471434159
[7] Jensen, W. A., Birch, J. B. and Woodall, W. H. 2008. Monitoring correlation within linear profiles using mixed models. J. Qual. Technol., 40: 167-183.
[8] Kim, K. and Yum, B. 1999. Control charts for random and fixed components of variation in the case of fixed wafer locations and measurement position. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf., 12: 214-228. · doi:10.1109/66.762880
[9] Nishina, K. 1992. A comparison of control charts from the viewpoint of change point estimation. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 8: 537-541. · doi:10.1002/qre.4680080605
[10] Page, E. S. 1954. Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika, 41: 1-9. · Zbl 0056.38002 · doi:10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100
[11] Page, E. S. 1961. Cumulative sum control charts. Technometrics, 3: 1-9.
[12] Patterson, H. D. and Thompson, R. 1971. Recovery of interblock information when cell sizes are unequal. Biometrika, 58: 545-554. · Zbl 0228.62046 · doi:10.1093/biomet/58.3.545
[13] Perry, M. B. 2010. Identifying the time of polynomial drift in the mean of autocorrelated processes. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 25: 399-415.
[14] Perry, M. B., Kharoufeh, J. P., Shekhar, S., Cai, J. and Shankar, M. R. Statistical characterization of nanostructured materials from severe plastic deformation in machining. IIE Trans., (2011), to appear
[15] Perry, M. B. and Pignatiello, J. J. Jr. 2006. Estimating the change point of a normal process mean with a linear trend disturbance in SPC. Qual. Technol. Quant. Manag., 3: 325-334.
[16] Perry, M. B. and Pignatiello, J. J. Jr. 2008. A change point model for the location parameter of exponential family densities. IIE Trans., 47: 947-956.
[17] Perry, M. B. and Pignatiello, J. J.J. Jr. 2009. Identifying the time of a step change in the mean of autocorrelated processes. J. Appl. Stat., 37: 119-136. · Zbl 1511.62233
[18] Pignatiello, J. J. Jr. and Samuel, T. R. 2001. Estimation of the change point of a normal process mean in SPC applications. J. Qual. Technol., 33: 82-95.
[19] Rassoul, N. and Shadman, A. 2009. Estimating the change point of a normal process mean with a monotonic change. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 25: 79-90.
[20] Roberts, S. W. 1959. Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics, 1: 239-250.
[21] Roes, K. C. and Does, R. J.M. 1995. Shewhart-type charts in nonstandard situations. Technometrics, 37: 15-40. · Zbl 0825.62741
[22] Samuel, T. R., Pignatiello, J. J. Jr. and Calvin, J. A. 1998. Identifying the time of a step change with Xbar control charts. Qual. Eng., 10: 521-527.
[23] Verbeke, G. and Molenberghs, G. 2000. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data, New York: Springer. · Zbl 0956.62055
[24] Woodall, W. H. and Thompson, E. V. 1995. Statistical process control with several components of common cause variability. IIE Trans., 27: 757-764.
[25] Yashchin, E. 1994. Monitoring variance components. Technometrics, 36: 379-393. · Zbl 0803.62089
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.