×

Analytic orbit theory with any arbitrary spherical harmonic as the dominant perturbation. (English) Zbl 1451.70048

Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 131, No. 10, Paper No. 45, 25 p. (2019); correction ibid. 133, No. 6, Paper No. 25, 3 p. (2021).
Summary: In the gravitational potential of Earth, the oblateness term is the dominant perturbation, with its coefficient at least three orders of magnitude greater than that of any other zonal or tesseral spherical harmonic. Therefore, analytic orbit theories (or satellite theories) are developed using the Keplerian Hamiltonian as the unperturbed solution, oblateness term as the first-order and the remaining spherical harmonics as the second-order perturbations. These orbit theories are generally constructed by applying multiple near-identity canonical transformations to the perturbed Hamiltonian in conjunction with averaging to obtain a secular Hamiltonian, from which the short-period and long-period terms are removed. If the oblateness term is the only first-order perturbation, then the long-period terms appear only in the second- or higher-order terms of the single-averaged Hamiltonian, from which the short-period terms are removed. These second-order long-period terms are separated from the Hamiltonian by the first-order generating function using a second canonical transformation. This results in a secular Hamiltonian dependent only on the momenta. However, in the case of other gravitational bodies with more deformed shapes compared to Earth such as moons and asteroids, the oblateness coefficient may have the same order of magnitude as some of the higher spherical harmonic coefficients. If these higher harmonics are treated as the first-order perturbation along with the oblateness term, then the long-period terms appear in the first-order single-averaged Hamiltonian. These first-order long-period terms cannot be separated using the generating function in the conventional way. This problem occurs because the zeroth-order Hamiltonian, i.e., the Keplerian part, is degenerate in the angular momentum. In this paper, a new approach to the long-period transformation is proposed to resolve this issue and obtain a fully analytic orbit theory when for the perturbing gravitational body, any arbitrary zonal or tesseral harmonic is the dominant perturbation. The proposed theory is closed form in the eccentricity as well. It is applied to predict the motion of artificial satellites for the two test cases: a lunar orbiter and a satellite of 433 Eros asteroid. The prediction accuracy is validated against the numerical propagation using a force model with \(6\times 6\) gravity field.

MSC:

70M20 Orbital mechanics
70H09 Perturbation theories for problems in Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics
70F15 Celestial mechanics
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Alfriend, K.T., Coffey, S.L.: Elimination of the perigee in the satellite problem. Celest. Mech. 32, 163-172 (1984) · Zbl 0542.70033 · doi:10.1007/BF01231123
[2] Brouwer, D.: Solution of the problem of artificial satellite theory without drag. Astron. J 64(1274), 378 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1086/107958 · doi:10.1086/107958
[3] Coffey, S.L., Alfriend, K.T.: Short period elimination for the tesseral harmonics. In: AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Lake Tahoe, 81-109 (1981)
[4] Coffey, S.L., Deprit, A.: Third-order solution to the main problem in satellite theory. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 5(4), 366-371 (1982). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.56183 · Zbl 0508.70010 · doi:10.2514/3.56183
[5] De Saedeleer, B.: Complete zonal problem of the artificial satellite: generic compact analytic first order in closed form. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 91(3-4), 239-268 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-004-1813-6 · Zbl 1151.70330 · doi:10.1007/s10569-004-1813-6
[6] De Saedeleer, B.: Analytical theory of a lunar artificial satellite with third body perturbations. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 95(1-4), 407-423 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-006-9029-6 · Zbl 1219.70066 · doi:10.1007/s10569-006-9029-6
[7] Deprit, A.: Canonical transformations depending on a small parameter. Celest. Mech. 1(1), 12-30 (1969) 10.1007/BF01230629, arXiv:1011.1669v3 · Zbl 0172.26002
[8] Deprit, A.: The elimination of the parallax in satellite theory. Celest. Mech. 24(2), 111-153 (1981a). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01229192 · Zbl 0492.70024 · doi:10.1007/BF01229192
[9] Deprit, A.: The main problem in the theory of artificial satellites to order four. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 4(2), 201-206 (1981b). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.56072 · doi:10.2514/3.56072
[10] Emeljanov, N., Kanter, A.: A method to compute inclination functions and their derivatives. Manuscr. Geod. 14, 77-83 (1989)
[11] Garfinkel, B.: The orbit of a satellite of an oblate planet. Astron. J. 64(1959), 353-366 (1959) · doi:10.1086/107956
[12] Gradshteyn, I.S., Ryzhik, I.M.: Table of Integrals, Series and Products. In: Zwillinger D. (ed.). 8th edn. Elsevier Ltd (2014) · Zbl 0918.65002
[13] Hori, G.I.: Theory of general perturbations with unspecified canonical variables. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 18(4), 287-296 (1966) http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1966PASJ...18..287H7
[14] Kamel, A.A.: Expansion formulae in canonical transformations depending on a small parameter. Celest. Mech. 1(2), 190-199 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01228838 · Zbl 0188.29201 · doi:10.1007/BF01228838
[15] Kaula, W.M.: Theory of Satellite Geodesy, 1st edn. Dover Publications Inc, New York (1966) · Zbl 0973.86001
[16] Kinoshita, H.; Szebehely, V. (ed.), Third-order solution of an artificial satellite theory, No. 72, 241-257 (1978), The Netherlands · Zbl 0393.70028
[17] Kozai, Y.: The motion of a close earth satellite. Astron. J. 64, 367-377, 10.1086/108389, arXiv:1011.1669v3 (1959) · doi:10.1086/107957
[18] Kudryavtsev, S.M.: The fifth-order analytical solution of the equations of motion of a satellite in orbit around a non-spherical planet. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 61(3), 207-215 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051893 · Zbl 0852.70013 · doi:10.1007/BF00051893
[19] Mahajan B (2018) Absolute and relative motion satellite theories for zonal and tesseral gravitational harmonics. Ph.D., thesis, Texas A and M University
[20] Mahajan, B., Vadali, S.R., Alfriend, K.T.: Exact delaunay normalization of the perturbed Keplerian Hamiltonian with tesseral harmonics. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 130(3), 25 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-018-9818-8 · Zbl 1390.70061 · doi:10.1007/s10569-018-9818-8
[21] Segerman, A.M., Coffey, S.L.: An analytical theory for tesseral gravitational harmonics. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 76, 139-156 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008345403145 · Zbl 0963.70020 · doi:10.1023/A:1008345403145
[22] Vinti, J.P.: New method of solution for unretarded satellite orbits. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. Sect. B Math. Math. Phys. 62B(2), 105-116 (1959). https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.063B.012 · doi:10.6028/jres.063B.012
[23] Yan, H., Vadali, S.R., Alfriend, K.T.: A recursive formulation of the satellite perturbed relative motion problem. Proceedings of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, San Diego, CA. AIAA 2014-4133 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-4133
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.