×

Spatial optimization of the pattern of fuel management activities and subsequent effects on simulated wildfires. (English) Zbl 1157.90506

Summary: Methods for scheduling forest management activities in a spatial pattern (dispersed, clumped, random, and regular) are presented, with the intent to examine the effects of placement of activities on resulting simulated wildfire behavior. Both operational and fuel reduction management prescriptions are examined, and a heuristic was employed to schedule the activities. The main hypothesis is that simulated wildfire effects during a severe fire season may be mitigated by scheduling activities in a pattern across the landscape. Results suggest: (1) operational management prescriptions, designed to promote the development of forest structure within a desired range of stand density, were not appropriate for mitigating wildfire effects, and (2) increased harvest levels obscure spatial patterns of activity, making patterns less clear as harvests increase. Results also suggest that fuel reduction management prescriptions may marginally minimize wildfire severity during a severe fire season, when scheduled in a spatial pattern.

MSC:

90C27 Combinatorial optimization
90C90 Applications of mathematical programming
91B76 Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.)

Software:

FlamMap; FARSITE
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Agee, J.K., 1998. Fire Strategies and Priorities for Forest Health in the Western United States. In: Proceedings of the 13th fire and forest meteorology conference, International Association of Wildland Fire, Hot Springs, SD, pp. 297-303.; Agee, J.K., 1998. Fire Strategies and Priorities for Forest Health in the Western United States. In: Proceedings of the 13th fire and forest meteorology conference, International Association of Wildland Fire, Hot Springs, SD, pp. 297-303.
[2] Agee, J. K.; Bahro, B.; Finney, M. A.; Omi, P. N.; Sapsis, D. B.; Skinner, C. N.; van Wagtendonk, J. W.; Weatherspoon, C. P., The use of fuel breaks in landscape fire management, Forest Ecology and Management, 127, 55-66 (2000)
[3] Bettinger, P.; Graetz, D.; Boston, K.; Sessions, J.; Chung, W., Eight heuristic planning techniques applied to three increasingly difficult wildlife planning problems, Silva Fennica, 36, 561-584 (2002)
[4] Bettinger, P.; Johnson, D. L.; Johnson, K. N., Spatial forest plan development with ecological and economic goals, Ecological Modelling, 169, 215-236 (2003)
[5] Bettinger, P.; Graetz, D.; Sessions, J., A density-dependent stand-level optimization approach for deriving management prescriptions for interior northwest (USA) landscape, Forest Ecology and Management, 217, 171-186 (2005)
[6] Bettinger, P.; Boston, K.; Kim, Y.-H.; Zhu, J., Landscape-level optimization using tabu search and stand density-related forest management prescriptions, European Journal of Operational Research, 176, 1265-1282 (2007) · Zbl 1102.90017
[7] Boots, B. N.; Getis, A., Point Pattern Analysis (1988), Sage: Sage Newbury Park, CA
[8] Catchpole, E. A.; Hatton, T. J.; Catchpole, W. R., Fire spread through nonhomogeneous fuel modeled as a Markov process, Ecological Modelling, 48, 101-112 (1989)
[9] Cressie, N. A.C., Statistics for Spatial Data (1993), Wiley-Interscience: Wiley-Interscience New York · Zbl 0468.62095
[10] Dueck, G., New optimization heuristics: The great deluge algorithm and the record-to-record travel, Journal of Computational Physics, 104, 86-92 (1993) · Zbl 0773.65042
[11] Dunn, A.T., 1989. The effects of prescribed burning on fire hazard in the Chaparral: Toward a new conceptual synthesis. In: Berg, N.H. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire and Watershed Management, General Technical Report PSW-109, USDA Forest Service, Sacramento, CA, pp. 23-29.; Dunn, A.T., 1989. The effects of prescribed burning on fire hazard in the Chaparral: Toward a new conceptual synthesis. In: Berg, N.H. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire and Watershed Management, General Technical Report PSW-109, USDA Forest Service, Sacramento, CA, pp. 23-29.
[12] Finney, M.A., 1998. FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator - Model development and evaluation. Research Paper RMRS-RP-4, Ft. USDA Forest Service, Collins, CO.; Finney, M.A., 1998. FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator - Model development and evaluation. Research Paper RMRS-RP-4, Ft. USDA Forest Service, Collins, CO.
[13] Finney, M. A., Mechanistic modeling of landscape fire patterns, (Mladenoff, D.; Baker, W., Spatial Modeling of Forest Landscape Change: Approaches and Application (1999), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK), 186-209
[14] Finney, M. A., Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behavior, Forest Science, 47, 219-228 (2001)
[15] Finney, M. A., Calculation of fire spread rates across random landscapes, International Journal of Wildland Fire, 12, 167-174 (2003)
[16] Finney, M. A.; Seli, R. C.; McHugh, C. W.; Ager, A. A.; Bahro, B.; Agee, J. K., Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires, (Andrews, P. L.; Butler, B. W., Fuels Management—How to Measure Success: Conference Proceedings, Proceedings RMRS-P-41 (2006), US Department of Agriculture Forest Service: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO), 125-147
[17] Fujioka, F. M., Estimating wildland fire rate of spread in a spatially non-uniform environment, Forest Science, 31, 21-29 (1985)
[18] Graetz, D.H., 2000. The SafeD model: Incorporating episodic disturbances and heuristic programming into forest management planning for the Applegate Watershed, Southwestern Oregon. MS Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 127p.; Graetz, D.H., 2000. The SafeD model: Incorporating episodic disturbances and heuristic programming into forest management planning for the Applegate Watershed, Southwestern Oregon. MS Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 127p.
[19] Green, L. R., Fuelbreaks and Other Fuel Modification for Wildland Fire Control, Agricultural Handbook, 499 (1977), USDA Forest Service: USDA Forest Service Washington, DC
[20] Helms, J. A., Positive effects of prescribed burning on wildfire intensities, Fire Management Notes, 40, 10-13 (1979)
[21] Jones, J.G., Chew, J.D., 1999. Applying simulation and optimization to evaluate the effectiveness of fuel treatments for different fuel conditions at landscape scales. In: Neuenschwander, L.F., Ryan, K.C. (Eds.), Proceedings of Joint Fire Science Conference and Workshop, pp. 89-95.; Jones, J.G., Chew, J.D., 1999. Applying simulation and optimization to evaluate the effectiveness of fuel treatments for different fuel conditions at landscape scales. In: Neuenschwander, L.F., Ryan, K.C. (Eds.), Proceedings of Joint Fire Science Conference and Workshop, pp. 89-95.
[22] Keane, R.E., Morgan, P., Running, S.W., 1997. FIRE-BGC - A mechanistic ecological process model for simulation fire succession on coniferous forest landscapes of the northern Rocky Mountains. General Technical Report INT-484, USDA Forest Service Ogden, UT.; Keane, R.E., Morgan, P., Running, S.W., 1997. FIRE-BGC - A mechanistic ecological process model for simulation fire succession on coniferous forest landscapes of the northern Rocky Mountains. General Technical Report INT-484, USDA Forest Service Ogden, UT.
[23] Kim, Y.-H., Bettinger, P., 2005. Spatial optimization of fuel management activities. In: Bevers, M., Barrett, T.M. (Eds.), Systems Analysis in Forest Resources: Proceedings of the 2003 Symposium. General Technical Report PNW-656, USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR, pp. 205-214.; Kim, Y.-H., Bettinger, P., 2005. Spatial optimization of fuel management activities. In: Bevers, M., Barrett, T.M. (Eds.), Systems Analysis in Forest Resources: Proceedings of the 2003 Symposium. General Technical Report PNW-656, USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR, pp. 205-214.
[24] LaGrande Forestry and Range Sciences Lab, 2000. Interior Northwest Landscape Analysis System. USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR. <http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/lagrande/inlas/index.htm>; LaGrande Forestry and Range Sciences Lab, 2000. Interior Northwest Landscape Analysis System. USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR. <http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/lagrande/inlas/index.htm>
[25] Martin, R. E., Rate of spread calculation for two fuels, Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 3, 54-55 (1988)
[26] Martin, R.E., Kauffman, J.B., Landsberg, J.D., 1989. Use of prescribed fire to reduce wildfire potential. In: Berg, N.H. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire and Watershed Management. General Technical Report PSW-109, USDA Forest Service Sacramento, CA.; Martin, R.E., Kauffman, J.B., Landsberg, J.D., 1989. Use of prescribed fire to reduce wildfire potential. In: Berg, N.H. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire and Watershed Management. General Technical Report PSW-109, USDA Forest Service Sacramento, CA.
[27] Mladenoff, D.; He, H. S., Design, behavior and application of LANDIS, an object-oriented model of forest landscape disturbance and succession, (Mladenoff, D.; Baker, W., Spatial Modeling of Forest Landscape Change: Approaches and Application (1999), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK), 125-162
[28] Omi, P.N., 1996. Landscape-level fuel manipulations in Greater Yellowstone: Opportunities and challenges. In: Greenlee, J. (Ed.), The Ecological Implications of Fire in Greater Yellowstone. Proceedings of the Second Biennial Conference on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, International Association of Wildland Fire, Fairfield, WA, pp. 7-14.; Omi, P.N., 1996. Landscape-level fuel manipulations in Greater Yellowstone: Opportunities and challenges. In: Greenlee, J. (Ed.), The Ecological Implications of Fire in Greater Yellowstone. Proceedings of the Second Biennial Conference on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, International Association of Wildland Fire, Fairfield, WA, pp. 7-14.
[29] Parsons, D. J.; van Wagtendonk, J. W., Fire research and management in the Sierra Nevada, (Halvorson, W. L.; Davis, G. E., Science and Ecosystem Management in the National Parks (1996), University of Arizona Press: University of Arizona Press Tucson)
[30] Rauscher, H. M.; Lloyd, F. T.; Loftis, D. L.; Twery, M. J., A practical decision-analysis process for forest ecosystem management, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 27, 195-226 (2000)
[31] Rose, D. W.; Borges, J.; Pelkki, M., Forest management planning based on stand-level decisions, Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 12, 133-142 (1995)
[32] Rothermel, R.C., Rinehart, G.C., 1983. Field procedures for verification and adjustment of fire behavior predictions. General Technical Report INT-142, USDA Forest Service Ogden, UT.; Rothermel, R.C., Rinehart, G.C., 1983. Field procedures for verification and adjustment of fire behavior predictions. General Technical Report INT-142, USDA Forest Service Ogden, UT.
[33] Sessions, J.; Johnson, K. N.; Franklin, J. F.; Gabriel, J. T., Achieving sustainable forest structures on fire-prone landscapes while pursuing multiple goals, (Mladenoff, D.; Baker, W., Spatial Modeling of Forest Landscape Change: Approaches and Application (1999), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK), 210-255
[34] Stephens, S. L., Evaluation of the effects of silvicultural and fuels treatments on potential fire behaviour in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests, Forest Ecology and Management, 105, 21-35 (1998)
[35] USDA Forest Service, 2000. Boundary Waters Canoe Area wilderness fuels management: Draft environmental impact statement. USDA Forest Service, Superior National Forest, Eastern Region, Milwaukee, WI.; USDA Forest Service, 2000. Boundary Waters Canoe Area wilderness fuels management: Draft environmental impact statement. USDA Forest Service, Superior National Forest, Eastern Region, Milwaukee, WI.
[36] USDA Forest Service, 2001. Sierra Nevada Forest plan amendment: Final environmental impact statement. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest and Intermountain and Intermountain Regions.; USDA Forest Service, 2001. Sierra Nevada Forest plan amendment: Final environmental impact statement. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest and Intermountain and Intermountain Regions.
[37] US Government Accountability Office, 2003. Wildland fire management: Additional actions required to better identify and prioritize lands needing fuels reduction. GAO Report Number GAO-03-805, US Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC, <http://www.gao.gov/htext/d03805.html>; US Government Accountability Office, 2003. Wildland fire management: Additional actions required to better identify and prioritize lands needing fuels reduction. GAO Report Number GAO-03-805, US Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC, <http://www.gao.gov/htext/d03805.html>
[38] van Wagtendonk, J.W., 1995. Large fires in wilderness areas. In: Brown, J.K., Mutch, R.W., Spoon, C.W., Wakimoto, R.H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire in Wilderness and Park Management. General Technical Report INT-GTR-320, USDA Forest Service Ogden, UT, pp. 113-116.; van Wagtendonk, J.W., 1995. Large fires in wilderness areas. In: Brown, J.K., Mutch, R.W., Spoon, C.W., Wakimoto, R.H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire in Wilderness and Park Management. General Technical Report INT-GTR-320, USDA Forest Service Ogden, UT, pp. 113-116.
[39] van Wagtendonk, J.W., 1996. Use of deterministic fire growth model to test fuel treatments. In: Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, vol. II, University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, Davis, pp. 1155-1167.; van Wagtendonk, J.W., 1996. Use of deterministic fire growth model to test fuel treatments. In: Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, vol. II, University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, Davis, pp. 1155-1167.
[40] Weatherspoon, C.P., Skinner, C.N., 1996. Landscape-level strategies for forest fuel management. In: Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, vol. II, Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options, University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, Davis, pp. 1471-1492.; Weatherspoon, C.P., Skinner, C.N., 1996. Landscape-level strategies for forest fuel management. In: Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, vol. II, Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options, University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, Davis, pp. 1471-1492.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.