zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Assessment of inner-outer interactions in the urban boundary layer using a predictive model. (English) Zbl 1419.76304
Summary: Urban-type rough-wall boundary layers developing over staggered cube arrays with plan area packing density, \(\lambda_p\), of 6.25 %, 25 % or 44.4 % have been studied at two Reynolds numbers within a wind tunnel using hot-wire anemometry (HWA). A fixed HWA probe is used to capture the outer-layer flow while a second moving probe is used to capture the inner-layer flow at 13 wall-normal positions between \(1.25h\) and \(4h\) where \(h\) is the height of the roughness elements. The synchronized two-point HWA measurements are used to extract the near-canopy large-scale signal using spectral linear stochastic estimation and a predictive model is calibrated in each of the six measurement configurations. Analysis of the predictive model coefficients demonstrates that the canopy geometry has a significant influence on both the superposition and amplitude modulation. The universal signal, the signal that exists in the absence of any large-scale influence, is also modified as a result of local canopy geometry suggesting that although the nonlinear interactions within urban-type rough-wall boundary layers can be modelled using the predictive model as proposed by R. Mathis et al. [ibid. 681, 537–566 (2011; Zbl 1241.76296)], the model must be however calibrated for each type of canopy flow regime. The Reynolds number does not significantly affect any of the model coefficients, at least over the limited range of Reynolds numbers studied here. Finally, the predictive model is validated using a prediction of the near-canopy signal at a higher Reynolds number and a prediction using reference signals measured in different canopy geometries to run the model. Statistics up to the fourth order and spectra are accurately reproduced demonstrating the capability of the predictive model in an urban-type rough-wall boundary layer.

76F40 Turbulent boundary layers
76F10 Shear flows and turbulence
Full Text: DOI
[1] Adrian, R.; Meinhart, C.; Tomkins, C., Vortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech., 422, 1-54, (2000) · Zbl 0959.76503
[2] Anderson, W., Amplitude modulation of streamwise velocity fluctuations in the roughness sublayer: evidence from large-eddy simulations, J. Fluid Mech., 789, 567-588, (2016)
[3] Awasthi, A.; Anderson, W., Numerical study of turbulent channel flow perturbed by spanwise topographic heterogeneity: amplitude and frequency modulation within low- and high-momentum pathways, Phys. Rev. Fluids, 3, (2018)
[4] Baars, W.; Hutchins, N.; Marusic, I., Spectral stochastic estimation of high-Reynolds-number wall-bounded turbulence for a refined inner-outer interaction model, Phys. Rev. Fluids, 1, 1-23, (2016)
[5] Baars, W. J.; Hutchins, N.; Marusic, I., Spectral stochastic estimation of high-Reynolds-number wall-bounded turbulence for a refined inner-outer interaction model, Phys. Rev. Fluids, 1, (2016)
[6] Baars, W. J.; Talluru, K. M.; Hutchins, N.; Marusic, I., Wavelet analysis of wall turbulence to study large-scale modulation of small scale, Exp. Fluids, 56, 188, 1-15, (2015)
[7] Basley, J.; Perret, L.; Mathis, R., Spatial modulations of kinetic energy in the roughness sublayer, J. Fluid Mech., 850, 584-610, (2018)
[8] Basley, J.; Perret, L.; Mathis, R., Structure of high Reynolds number boundary layers over cube canopies, J. Fluid Mech., 870, 460-491, (2019) · Zbl 07059742
[9] Blackman, K.; Perret, L., Non-linear interactions in a boundary layer developing over an array of cubes using stochastic estimation, Phys. Fluids, 28, (2016)
[10] Blackman, K.; Perret, L.; Calmet, I., Energy transfer and non-linear interactions in an urban boundary layer using stochastic estimation, J. Turbul., 19, 849-867, (2018)
[11] Blackman, K.; Perret, L.; Savory, E., Effect of upstream flow regime on street canyon flow mean turbulence statistics, Environ. Fluid Mech., 15, 823-849, (2015)
[12] Blackman, K.; Perret, L.; Savory, E., Effects of upstream-flow regime and canyon aspect ratio on non-linear interactions between a street-canyon flow and the overlying boundary layer, Boundary Layer Meteorol., 169, 537-558, (2017)
[13] Cheng, H.; Castro, I. P., Near wall flow over urban-like roughness, Boundary Layer Meteorol., 104, 229-259, (2002)
[14] Coceal, O.; Dobre, A.; Thomas, T. G.; Belcher, S. E., Structure of turbulent flow over regular arrays of cubical roughness, J. Fluid Mech., 589, 375-409, (2007) · Zbl 1141.76399
[15] Duvvuri, S.; Mckeon, B., Triadic scale interactions in a turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech., 767, R4, (2015)
[16] Ghisalberti, M., Obstructed shear flows: similarities across systems and scales, J. Fluid Mech., 641, 51-61, (2009) · Zbl 1183.76754
[17] Grimmond, C. S. B.; Oke, T. R., Aerodynamic properties of urban areas derived from analysis of surface form, J. Appl. Meteorol., 38, 1262-1292, (1999)
[18] Guala, M.; Metzger, M.; Mckeon, B. J., Interactions within the turbulent boundary layer at high Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech., 666, 573-604, (2011) · Zbl 1225.76015
[19] Herpin, S.; Perret, L.; Mathis, R.; Tanguy, C.; Lasserre, J.-J., Investigation of the flow inside an urban canopy immersed into an atmospheric boundary layer using laser Doppler anemometry, Exp. Fluids, 59, 1-80, (2018)
[20] Hultmark, M.; Smits, A., Temperature corrections for constant temperature and constant current hot-wire anemometers, Meas. Sci. Technol., 21, (2010)
[21] Hussain, F., Coherent structures – reality and myth, Phys. Fluids, 26, 2816-2838, (1983) · Zbl 0524.76066
[22] Hutchins, N.; Marusic, I., Evidence of very long meandering features in the logarithmic region of turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech., 579, 1-28, (2007) · Zbl 1113.76004
[23] Inoue, M.; Mathis, R.; Marusic, I.; Pullin, D., Inner-layer intensities for the flat-plate turbulent boundary layer combining a predictive wall-model with large-eddy simulation, Phys. Fluids, 24, (2012)
[24] Macdonald, R. W.; Griffiths, R. F.; Hall, D. J., An improved method for estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays, Atmos. Environ., 32, 857-1864, (1998)
[25] Marusic, I.; Mathis, R.; Hutchins, N., A wall-shear stress predictive model. In Proceedings of 13th European Turbulence Conference (ETC13), J. Phys. Conf. Series, 318, (2011)
[26] Mathis, R.; Hutchins, N.; Marusic, I., Large-scale amplitude modulation of the small-scale structures in turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech., 628, 311-337, (2009) · Zbl 1181.76008
[27] Mathis, R.; Hutchins, N.; Marusic, I., A predictive inner-outer model for streamwise turbulence statistics in wall-bounded flows, J. Fluid Mech., 681, 537-566, (2011) · Zbl 1241.76296
[28] Mathis, R., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I.2011bRelationship between turbulence modulation and skewness in wall bounded flows. In Proceedings of 7th Turbulent and Shear Flow Phenomena conference (TSFP7), Ottawa, Canada, vol. 1, pp. 1-6.
[29] Mathis, R.; Marusic, I.; Hutchins, N.; Sreenivasan, K. R., The relationship between the velocity skewness and the amplitude modulation of the small scale by the large scale in turbulent boundary layers, Phys. Fluids, 23, 12, (2011)
[30] Nadeem, M.; Lee, J. H.; Lee, J.; Sung, H. J., Turbulent boundary layers over sparsely-spaced rod-roughened walls, Intl. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 56, 16-27, (2015)
[31] Pathikonda, G.; Christensen, K. T., Inner – outer interactions in a turbulent boundary layer overlying complex roughness, Phys. Rev. Fluids, 2, (2017)
[32] Perret, L.; Basley, J.; Mathis, R.; Piquet, T., Atmospheric boundary layers over urban-like terrains: influence of the plan density on the roughness sublayer dynamics, Boundary Layer Meteorol., 170, 205-234, (2019)
[33] Perret, L. & Rivet, C.2013Dynamics of a turbulent boundary layer over cubical roughness elements: insight from PIV measurements and POD analysis. In Proceedings of 8th International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena (TSFP8), Poitiers, France, vol. 3, pp. 1-6.
[34] Perret, L.; Rivet, C., A priori analysis of the performance of cross hot-wire probes in a rough wall boundary layer based on stereoscopic PIV, Exp. Fluids, 59, 10, 153-176, (2018)
[35] Rao, K. N.; Narasimha, R.; Narayanan, M. A. B., The bursting phenomenon in a turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech., 48, 2, 339-352, (1971)
[36] Reynolds, R. T.; Castro, I. P., Measurements in an urban-type boundary layer, Exp. Fluids, 45, 141-156, (2008)
[37] Salesky, S. T.; Anderson, W., Buoyancy effects on large-scale motions in convective atmospheric boundary layers: implications for modulation of near-wall processes, J. Fluid Mech., 856, 135-168, (2018) · Zbl 1415.76408
[38] Savory, E.; Perret, L.; Rivet, C., Modelling considerations for examining the mean and unsteady flow in a simple urban-type street canyon, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 121, 1-16, (2013)
[39] Squire, D. T.; Morill-Winter, C.; Hutchins, N.; Schultz, M. P.; Klewicki, J. C.; Marusic, I., Comparison of turbulent boundary layers over smooth and rough surfaces up to high Reynolds numbers, J. Fluid Mech., 795, 210-240, (2016) · Zbl 1359.76146
[40] Takimoto, H.; Inagaki, A.; Kanda, M.; Sato, A.; Michioka, T., Length-scale similarity of turbulent organized structures over surfaces with different roughness types, Boundary Layer Meteorol., 147, 2, 217-236, (2013)
[41] Talluru, K. M.; Baidya, R.; Hutchins, N.; Marusic, I., Amplitude modulation of all three velocity components in turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech., 746, R1, (2014) · Zbl 1416.76065
[42] Townsend, A., The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, (1976), Cambridge University Press · Zbl 0325.76063
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.