×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Uniqueness conditions for strongly point-rationalizable solutions to games with metrizable strategy sets. (English) Zbl 1142.91015
Summary: This paper introduces the iterative solution concept of strong point-rationalizability as a strengthening of standard point-rationalizability by stipulating that any two players have identical beliefs about the strategy choices of their common opponents. By adopting and generalizing the contraction-property approach of H. Moulin [Math. Soc. Sci. 7, 83–102 (1984; Zbl 0541.90098)] and D. Bernheim [Econometria 52, 1007–1028 (1984; Zbl 0552.90098)] we derive sufficient conditions for the existence of unique strongly point-rationalizable strategies in strategic games with best response functions. These uniqueness results are derived under fairly general assumptions and are especially useful for complete and bounded, as well as finite strategy sets. For games with monotonic individual best response functions, equivalence between a unique strongly point-rationalizable and a unique point-rationalizable solution in the standard sense is established. Furthermore, the existence of unique fixed points is proven under conditions that generalize for bounded metric spaces an established fixed point theorem by F. F. Bonsall [Lectures on Some Fixed Point Theorems of Functional Analysis. Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay (1962)] and D. R. Smart [Fixed point theorems. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. 66. London: Cambridge University Press (1974; Zbl 0297.47042)]. Possible extensions of our findings to games with multi-valued best response correspondences are discussed.

MSC:
91A10 Noncooperative games
91A26 Rationality and learning in game theory
PDF BibTeX Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Basu, K., A characterization of the class of rationalizable equilibria of oligopoly games, Economics letters, 40, 187-191, (1992) · Zbl 0771.90018
[2] Bernheim, B.D., Rationalizable strategic behavior, Econometrica, 52, 1007-1028, (1984) · Zbl 0552.90098
[3] Binmore, K., Modeling rational players. part I, Economics and philosophy, 3, 179-214, (1987)
[4] Bonsall, F.F., Lectures on some fixed point theorems of functional analysis, (1962), Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Bombay · Zbl 0142.10105
[5] Börgers, T., Pure strategy dominance, Econometrica, 61, 423-430, (1993) · Zbl 0768.90103
[6] Fudenberg, D.; Tirole, J., Game theory, (1996), The MIT Press Cambridge, MA
[7] Ghirardato, P., Le Breton, M., 1997. Choquet rationality. Mimeo
[8] Ghirardato, P.; Le Breton, M., Choquet rationality, Journal of economic theory, 90, 277-285, (2000) · Zbl 1038.91521
[9] Guesnerie, R., Anchoring economic predictions in common knowledge, Econometrica, 70, 439-480, (2002) · Zbl 1184.91130
[10] Milgrom, P.; Roberts, J., Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementaries, Econometrica, 58, 1255-1277, (1990) · Zbl 0728.90098
[11] Moulin, H., Dominance solvability and Cournot stability, Mathematical social sciences, 7, 83-102, (1984) · Zbl 0541.90098
[12] Nash, J.F., 1950. Non-cooperative games. Ph.D. Dissertation. Princeton University, in: Kuhn, H.W., Nasar, S. (Eds.), The Essential John Nash. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2002 (Chapter 6)
[13] Pearce, D.G., Rationalizable strategic behavior and the problem of perfection, Econometrica, 52, 1029-1050, (1984) · Zbl 0552.90097
[14] Smart, D.R., Fixed point theorems, (1974), Cambridge University Press Cambridge, London · Zbl 0297.47042
[15] Tan, T.; Costa Da Werlang, S.R., On aumann’s notion of common knowledge, an alternative approach, Journal of economic theory, 45, 370-391, (1988)
[16] Topkis, D., Equilibrium points in nonzero-sum n-person submodular games, SIAM journal of control and optimization, 17, 773-787, (1979) · Zbl 0433.90091
[17] Vives, X., Nash equilibrium with strategic complementarities, Journal of mathematical economics, 19, 305-321, (1990) · Zbl 0708.90094
[18] Vives, X., Complementarities and games: new developments, Journal of economic literature, 43, 437-479, (2005)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.