A representation of FS-domains by formal concept analysis. (English) Zbl 1480.18004

The category Dom of continuous domains with Scott continuous functions is not cartesian closed while from [A. Jung, Cartesian closed categories of domains. Amsterdam: Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica (1989; Zbl 0719.06004); “The classification of continuous domains”, in: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science. Los Alamitos,CA: IEEE Computer Society. 35–40 (1990)] it is known that the full subcategory FSD of FS-domains (a pointed dcpo with a directed set of continuous endomorphisms, each finitely separated from the identity morphism and having the identity morphism as its supremum [S. Abramsky and A. Jung, Domain theory, corrected and expanded version. https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~axj/pub/papers/handy1.pdf]) is maximal cartesian closed. The present paper proposes a notion of FS-contexts (based on the notion of contractive operators in [L. Wang et al., Fundam. Inform. 179, No. 3, 295–319 (2021; Zbl 07426112)]) and shows: each FS-domain, upto isomorphism, is the set of FS-formal concepts of a FS-context.


18B35 Preorders, orders, domains and lattices (viewed as categories)
06B35 Continuous lattices and posets, applications
06A15 Galois correspondences, closure operators (in relation to ordered sets)
06A06 Partial orders, general
03E20 Other classical set theory (including functions, relations, and set algebra)
Full Text: DOI


[1] Amadio, RM; Curien, PL, Domains and Lambda-Calculi (1998), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
[2] Davey, BA; Priestley, HA, Introduction to Lattices and Order (2002), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
[3] Ganter, B.; Wille, R., Formal Concept Analasis (1999), Berlin: Springer, Berlin
[4] Gierz, G.; Hofmann, KH; Keimel, K.; Lawson, JD; Mislove, M.; Scott, DS, Continuous Lattices and Domains (2003), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · Zbl 1088.06001
[5] Goubault-Larrecq, J., Non-Hausdorff Topology and Domain Theory. New Mathematical Monographs (2013), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · Zbl 1280.54002
[6] Guo, L.; Huang, F.; Li, Q.; Zhang, G., Power contexts and their concept lattices, Discrete Math., 311, 2049-2063 (2011) · Zbl 1233.68207
[7] Guo, L.; Li, Q.; Huang, M., A categorical representation of algebraic domains based on variations of rough approximable concepts, Int. J. Approx. Reason., 55, 885-895 (2014) · Zbl 1316.68160
[8] Guo, L.; Li, Q.; Yao, L., Locally complete consistent F-augmented contexts: A category-theoretic representation of algebraic domains, Discrete Appl. Math., 249, 53-58 (2018) · Zbl 1398.68515
[9] Guo, L.; Li, Q.; Zhang, G-Q, A representation of continuous domains via relationally approximable concepts in a generalized framework of formal concept analysis, Int. J. Approx. Reason., 114, 29-43 (2019) · Zbl 1468.68222
[10] Hitzler, P.: What’s happening in semantic web: and what FCA could have to do with it. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, Nicosia, Cyprus,18-23 (2011)
[11] Hitzler, P., Wendt, M.: Formal concept analysis and resolution in algebraic domains. In: de Moor, A., B. Ganter, B. (eds.) Using Conceptual Strucures—Contributions to ICCS 2003, Shaker Verlag, pp. 157-170 (2003)
[12] Hitzler, P., \(Kr \ddot{o}\) etzsch, M., Zhang, G.:A categorical view on algebraic lattices in formal concept analysis. Fundam. Inform. 74, 1-29 (2006)
[13] Huang, M.; Li, Q.; Guo, L., Formal context for algebraic domains, Eletron Notes Theor. Comput. Sci., 301, 79-90 (2014) · Zbl 1337.68245
[14] Jung, A.: Cartesian Closed Categories of Domains. CWI Tracts, vol. 66, p.107. Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, Amesterdam (1989) · Zbl 0719.06004
[15] Jung, A.: The classification of continuous domains. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, IEEE Computer Society Press, New York, 35-40 (1990)
[16] Li, J.; Huang, C.; Qi, J.; Qian, Y.; Liu, W., Three-way cognitive concept learning via multi-granularity, Inf. Sci., 378, 1, 244-263 (2017) · Zbl 1429.68228
[17] Li, JH; Wei, L.; Zhang, Z.; Zhai, YH; Zhang, T.; Zhi, HL; Mi, YL, Concept lattice theory and method and their research prospect, Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell., 33, 7, 619-642 (2020)
[18] Li, Q.; Guo, L., Formal query systems on contexts and a representation of algebraic lattices, Inf. Sci., 239, 72-84 (2013) · Zbl 1320.68174
[19] Li, J.; Kumar, C.; Mei, C.; Wang, X., Comparison of reduction in formal decision contexts, Int. J. Approx. Reason., 80, 100-122 (2017) · Zbl 1400.68208
[20] Mac Lane, S., Categories for the Working Mathematician. Graduate Texts in Mathematics (1971), Berlin: Springer, Berlin · Zbl 0232.18001
[21] Mislove, MW, Topology, domain theory and theoretical computer science, Topol. Appl., 89, 1-2, 3-59 (1998) · Zbl 0923.54027
[22] Poelmans, J.; Ignatov, DI; Kuznetsov, SO; Dedene, G., Formal concept analysis in knowledge processing: a survey on applications, Expert Syst. Appl., 40, 6538-6560 (2013)
[23] Scott, D.: Outline of a mathematical theory of computation. In: 4th Annual Princeton Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, pp. 169-176 (1970)
[24] Scott, D., Strachey, C.: Towards a mathematical semantics for computer languages. In: Proceeding of 21st Symposium on Computers and Automata. Polytechnic institute of Brooklyn, 19-46 (1971) · Zbl 0268.68004
[25] Scott, D., Lattice theory, data type and semantics, Formal Semant. Program. Lang., 2, 65-106 (1972)
[26] Sun, X.: Construction data mining information management system based on FCA and ontology. In: Advances in Electronic Engineering, Communication and Management. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 19-24(2012)
[27] Valtchev, P.; Missaoui, R.; Lebrun, P., A partition-based approach towards constructing Galois (concept) lattices, Discrete Math., 256, 801-829 (2002) · Zbl 1013.06007
[28] Wang, L.; Guo, L.; Li, Q., Continuous domains in formal concept analysis, Fundam. Inform., 179, 295-319 (2021) · Zbl 07426112
[29] Zhang, G.; Shen, G., Approximable concepts, Chu space, and information systems, Theory Appl. Categ., 17, 5, 80-102 (2006) · Zbl 1111.68132
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.