×

Score tests in GMM: why use implied probabilities? (English) Zbl 1464.62498

Summary: While simple to implement and thus attractive in practice, the GMM score test of W. K. Newey and K. D. West [Int. Econ. Rev. 28, No. 3, 777–787 (1987; Zbl 0676.62029)] often displays upward size distortion under common scenarios involving skewed moment vectors or models with weak identification. Inference based on the Generalized Empirical Likelihood (GEL) is seen as a general solution to this problem. F. Kleibergen [Econometrica 73, No. 4, 1103–1123 (2005; Zbl 1152.91715)] and, more generally, P. Guggenberger and R. J. Smith [Econom. Theory 21, No. 4, 667–709 (2005; Zbl 1083.62086)] devised an elegant theory for the GEL score tests. However, strictly speaking, the GEL score tests do not nest the Newey-West score test. Our paper provides a unified framework for score tests in GMM that nests all of the above as special cases and helps us to understand the precise mechanism by which the standard first order asymptotic theory on size and power well approximates the finite sample behavior of some score tests (namely, a subset of the GEL score tests) but not others. Special attention is paid to models with weak identification. We also argue that the apparent computational burden of GEL can be overcome in practice by recognizing the fundamental common role played by the GEL implied probabilities under all special cases of our framework. In particular, we show that all the GEL implied probabilities are asymptotically equivalent at a higher order – both under the null and under appropriate sequences of alternatives – and thus are exchangeable across computationally burdensome (e.g. Empirical Likelihood) and easy (e.g. Euclidean Empirical Likelihood) GEL score tests without affecting the first order asymptotics. Extensive simulation evidence is provided to corroborate our theoretical results. The simulation results also support a simple and yet important insight on the power of the tests: the use of implied probabilities to efficiently estimate the components of the score statistic, namely, the Jacobian and the asymptotic variance of the moment vector, can significantly improve the power of the score test in finite samples.

MSC:

62P20 Applications of statistics to economics
62F03 Parametric hypothesis testing
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI Link

References:

[1] Anderson, T. W.; Rubin, H., Estimation of the paramters of a single equation in a complete system of stochastic equations, Ann. Math. Stat., 20, 46-63 (1949) · Zbl 0033.08002
[2] Andrews, D. W.K.; Guggenberger, P., Asymptotic size of Kleibergen’s LM and conditional LR tests for moment condition models, Econom. Theory, 33, 1046-1080 (2017) · Zbl 1442.62728
[3] Antoine, B.; Bonnal, H.; Renault, E., On the efficient use of the informational content of estimating equations: Implied probabilities and Euclidean empirical likelihood, J. Econometrics, 138, 461-487 (2007) · Zbl 1418.62101
[4] Antoine, B.; Renault, E., Efficient minimum distance estimation with multiple rates of convergence, J. Ecnom., 170, 350-367 (2012) · Zbl 1443.62421
[5] Back, K.; Brown, D., Implied probabilities in GMM estimators, Econometrica, 61, 971-976 (1993) · Zbl 0785.62031
[6] Bera, A.; Montes-Rojas, G.; Sosa-Escudero, W., General specification testing with locally misspecified models, Econom. Theory, 26, 1838-1845 (2010) · Zbl 1294.62026
[7] Caner, M., Exponential tilting with weak instruments: Estimation and testing, Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat., 72, 307-326 (2010)
[8] Chaudhuri, S.; Renault, E., Shrinkage of variance for minimum distance based tests, Econometric Rev., 34, 328-351 (2015) · Zbl 1491.62194
[9] Chaudhuri, S.; Renault, E., Tests for Non-Linear Restrictions with Heterogeneity in Identification Strengths (2018), Mimeo
[10] Gagliardini, P.; Gourieroux, C.; Renault, E., Efficient derivative pricing by the extended method of moments, Econometrica, 79, 1181-1232 (2011) · Zbl 1250.91097
[11] Guggenberger, P.; Smith, R., Generalized empirical likelihood estimators and tests under partial, weak and strong identification, Econom. Theory, 21, 667-709 (2005) · Zbl 1083.62086
[12] Hall, A. R., Covariance matrix estimation and the power of the overidentifying restrictions test, Econometrica, 68, 1517-1527 (2000) · Zbl 1015.62123
[13] Hansen, L. P., Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators, Econometrica, 50, 1029-1054 (1982) · Zbl 0502.62098
[14] Hansen, L. P.; Heaton, J.; Yaron, A., Finite-sample properties of some alternative GMM estimators, J. Bus. Econom. Statist., 14, 262-280 (1996)
[15] Hausman, J.; Lewis, R.; Menzel, K.; Newey, W., Properties of the CUE estimator and a modification with moments, J. Econometrics, 165, 45-57 (2011) · Zbl 1441.62728
[16] Imbens, G. W.; Spady, R. H.; Johnson, P., Information theoretic approaches to inference in moment condition models, Econometrica, 66, 333-357 (1998) · Zbl 1055.62512
[17] Kitamura, Y.; Stutzer, M., An information-theoretic alternative to generalized method of moments estimation, Econometrica, 65, 861-874 (1997) · Zbl 0894.62011
[18] Kleibergen, F., Pivotal statistics for testing structural parameters in instrumental variables regression, Econometrica, 70, 1781-1803 (2002) · Zbl 1141.62361
[19] Kleibergen, F., Testing parameters in GMM without assuming that they are identified, Econometrica, 73, 1103-1123 (2005) · Zbl 1152.91715
[20] Moreira, M. J., A conditional likelihood ratio test for structural models, Econometrica, 71, 1027-1048 (2003) · Zbl 1151.62367
[21] Newey, W. K.; Smith, R. J., Higher order properties of GMM and generalized empirical likelihood estimators, Econometrica, 72, 219-255 (2004) · Zbl 1151.62313
[22] Newey, W. K.; West, K. D., Hypothesis testing with efficient method of moments estimation, Internat. Econom. Rev., 28, 777-787 (1987) · Zbl 0676.62029
[23] Owen, A. B., Empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions, Ann. Statist., 18, 90-120 (1990) · Zbl 0712.62040
[24] Ramalho, J.; Smith, R., Goodness of Fit Tests for Moment Condition Models (2006), Mimeo
[25] Schennach, S. M., Point estimation with exponentially tilted empirical likelihood, Ann. Statist., 35, 634-672 (2007) · Zbl 1117.62024
[26] Smith, R. J., Alternative semi-parametric likelihood approaches to generalized method of moments estimation, Econom. J., 107, 503-519 (1997)
[27] Stock, J. H.; Wright, J. H., GMM with weak identification, Econometrica, 68, 1055-1096 (2000) · Zbl 1015.62105
[28] Wang, J.; Zivot, E., Inference on a structural parameter in instrumental variables regression with weak instruments, Econometrica, 66, 1389-1404 (1998) · Zbl 1056.62548
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.