Fuzzy quantic nuclei and conuclei with applications to fuzzy semi-quantales and \((L,M)\)-quasi-fuzzy topologies. (English) Zbl 1454.06015

There exists a convenient description of quotient quantales (resp. subquantales) with the help of quantic nuclei (resp. conuclei) [K. I. Rosenthal, Quantales and their applications. Harlow: Longman Scientific & Technical; New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1990; Zbl 0703.06007)]. Given a quantale \(Q\), a quantic nucleus on \(Q\) is a map \(j: Q\rightarrow Q\), which is a closure operator (an order-preserving map with \(1_Q\leqslant j\) and \(j\circ j = j\)) such that \(j(a)\otimes j(b)\leqslant j(a\otimes b)\) for every \(a,\,b\in Q\), where \(\otimes\) stands for the quantale operation on \(Q\). A quantic conucleus changes property \(1_Q\leqslant j\) to \(j\leqslant 1_Q\) (relies on a coclosure operator).
Looking for the basic structure of lattice-valued topology, S. E. Rodabaugh [Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2007, Article ID 43645, 71 p. (2007; Zbl 1145.54004)] introduced the concept of semi-quantale as a partially ordered set having arbitrary joins and equipped with a binary operation \(\otimes\) (with no additional requirement). Soon enough M. Demirci [“Fuzzy semi-quantales, \((L, M)\) quasi-fuzzy topological spaces and their duality”, in: Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on computational intelligence (IJCCI), Lisbon, 2015. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press. 105–111 (2015)] provided a fuzzy version of semi-quantales in the sense of fuzzy groups of A. Rosenfeld [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 35, 512–517 (1971; Zbl 0194.05501)]. The present paper takes up the concept of Demirci [loc. cit.] and introduces its respective notion of fuzzy quantic (co)nucleus. The authors then show several ways of constructing fuzzy quantic (co)nuclei, relate them to \((L, M)\)-fuzzy topology of T. Kubiak and A. Šostak [Quaest. Math. 20, No. 3, 423–429 (1997; Zbl 0890.54005)] (following the idea of Demirci [loc. cit.] that \((L, M)\)-fuzzy topologies are actually fuzzy semi-quantales), and also to ideals of quantales of S. Wang and B. Zhao [J. Shaanxi Norm. Univ., Nat. Sci. Ed. 31, No. 4, 7–10 (2003; Zbl 1045.06007)], fuzzifying the latter concept (following the ideas of Rosenfeld again [loc. cit.]) to suit fuzzy semi-quantales.
While the paper is well written (the amount of typos is at the minimum), provides all of its required preliminaries, and could be of interest to the community of fuzzy algebraists, its mathematical content is a bit discouraging. First, the authors devote an entire section to introduce the well-known notion of product of quantales (including lengthy superfluous proofs). Second, not all proofs provided in the paper look correct (thus, some of the results seem doubtful, e.g., Proposition 4 on page 7, Lemma 3 on page 8, Proposition 8 on page 10, Proposition 11 on page 12, Proposition 15 on page 15, Lemmas 4, 5 on page 16). Third, the authors seem to be often in trouble with the notation of residuation operations in quantales. Recall that given a quantale \((Q,\otimes)\), every \(a\in Q\) induces join-preserving maps \(a\otimes-\) and \(-\otimes a\), which thus have the respective upper adjoint maps \(a\searrow - \) and \(-\swarrow a\) (in the notation of the authors). These adjunctions then imply that for every \(a,\,b,\,c\in Q\), \(a\otimes b\leqslant c\) iff \(b\leqslant a\searrow c\) iff \(a\leqslant c\swarrow b\). However, Formula (1) on page 3 of the paper strangely gives “\(a\otimes b\leqslant c \Leftrightarrow\ a\leqslant b\searrow c\Leftrightarrow\ b\leqslant c\swarrow a\)”. Fourth, it is not clear why the authors consider ideals of quantales, which are closed under finite joins, while quantales themselves rely on infinite joins, and, moreover, the ideals closed under infinite joins were used by Rosenthal [loc. cit.] himself (see the above citation). Fifth, almost at the very end of page 2, the authors state that “CoQuant is the full subcategory of SQuant, which has as objects all coquantales and as morphisms, all maps that preserve the tensor product and arbitrary meets.” A full subcategory, however, singles out some objects and takes all morphisms between them (and this is the reason for calling it full).


06F07 Quantales
06A15 Galois correspondences, closure operators (in relation to ordered sets)
54A40 Fuzzy topology
06B30 Topological lattices
Full Text: DOI


[1] Mulvey, C. J.: &. Suppl. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo Ser. 12, 99-104 (1986).
[2] Rodabaugh, S. E.: Relationship of algebraic theories to powerset theories and fuzzy topological theories for lattice-valued mathematics. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 71, 2007 (2007). Article ID 43645, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/43645. · Zbl 1145.54004
[3] Höhle, U.: Prime elements of non-integral quantales and their applications. Order. 32, 329-346 (2015). · Zbl 1329.06008
[4] El-Saady, K.: Topological representation and quantic separation axioms of semi-quantales. J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 24, 568-573 (2016). · Zbl 1353.54023
[5] El-Saady, K.: A non-commutative approach to uniform structures. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 31, 217-225 (2016). · Zbl 1367.06008
[6] Zhang, D.: Sobriety of quantale-valued cotopological spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 350, 1-19 (2018). · Zbl 1397.54026
[7] Demirci, M., Fuzzy semi-quantales, (l, m)-quasi-fuzzy topological spaces and their duality (2015), Lisbon
[8] Kubiak, A. T.; S̆ostak, A. P.; Bodenhofer, U. (ed.); DeBaets, B. (ed.); Klement, E. P. (ed.); Saminger-Platz, S. (ed.), Foundations of the theory of (L, M)-fuzzy topological spaces (2009), Linz
[9] Höhle, U., S̆ostak, A. P.: Mathematics of Fuzzy Sets:Logic, Topology and Measure Theory. In: Höhle, U., Rodabaugh, S. E. (eds.), pp. 123-272. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1999).
[10] Rodabaugh, S. E.: Functorial comparisons of bitopology with topology and the case for redundancy of bitopology in lattice-valued mathematics. Appl. Gen. Topol. 9, 77-108 (2008).
[11] Bělohlávek, R.: Fuzzy Relational Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, NewYork (2002). · Zbl 1027.06008
[12] Hájek, P.: Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998). · Zbl 0937.03030
[13] Rosenthal, K. I.: Quantales and Their Applications. Longman Scientific and Technical, New York (1990). · Zbl 0703.06007
[14] Rodabaugh, S. E.: Topological and Algebraic Structures in Fuzzy Sets, The Handbook of Recent Developments in the Mathematics of Fuzzy Sets,Trends in Logic. In: Klement, E. P., Rodabaugh, S. E. (eds.), pp. 199-234. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordrecht/London (2003).
[15] Rodabaugh, S. E.: A categorical accommodation of various notions of fuzzy topology. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 9, 241-265 (1983). · Zbl 0527.54005
[16] Denniston, J. T., Melton, A., Rodabaugh, S. E.: Formal concept analysis and lattice-valued chu systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 216, 52-90 (2013). · Zbl 1320.06004
[17] Gierz, G., Hofmann, K. H., Keimel, K., et al.: Continuous Lattices and Domains. Cambridge University Press, UK (2003). · Zbl 1088.06001
[18] Erné, M., Koslowski, J., A., M., Strecker, G. E.: A primer on galois connections. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 704, 103-125 (1993). · Zbl 0809.06006
[19] Solovyov, S.: Lattice-valued topological systems as a framework for lattice-valued formal concept analysis. J. Math. 2013(Article ID 506275), 33 (2013). Article ID 506275, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/506275. · Zbl 1403.06009
[20] Wang, S. Q., Zhao, B.: Ideals of quantales. J. Shaanxi Norm. Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 31(4), 7-10 (2003). (in Chinese). · Zbl 1045.06007
[21] Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, New York (1996). · Zbl 0861.06001
[22] Tamura, T.: Examples of direct products of semigroups or groupoids. Am. Math. Soc. 31, 419-422 (1962). · Zbl 0115.25002
[23] Petrich, M.: Categories of Algebraic Systems. Springer, New York (1976). · Zbl 0357.18005
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.