# zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

The effective interface approach for coupling of the FE and meshless FD methods and applying essential boundary conditions. (English) Zbl 1443.65342
Summary: The paper presents a new effective technique for coupling two computational methods with different types of discretization and approximation. It is based on a concept of two adjacent subdomains which are connected with each other by means of a thin layer of material. Each of the subdomain may have a different discretization structure and approximation base. The standard Finite Element Method (FEM) as well as the meshless Finite Difference Method (MFDM) are applied here to be coupled. However, the coupling can be used for any other methods. The same concept is used for applying the essential boundary conditions for both of the methods. The width of the interface layer, depending on discretization density, is evaluated by means of several heuristic assumptions. The paper is illustrated with selected two- and three-dimensional examples.

##### MSC:
 65N30 Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs 65N06 Finite difference methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs
MFDMtool; FEAPpv
Full Text:
##### References:
 [2] Krok, J.; Orkisz, J., A unified approach to the FE and generalized variational FD methods in nonlinear mechanics, concepts and numerical approach, Discrete Methods Struct. Mech., 1, 353-362 (1990) · Zbl 0714.73079 [4] Rao, B.; Rahman, S., A coupled meshless-finite element method for fracture analysis of cracks, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 78, 9, 647-657 (2001) [5] Belytschko, T.; Organ, D.; Krongauz, Y., Coupled finite element/element free Galerkin method, Comput. Mech., 17, 186-195 (1995) · Zbl 0840.73058 [6] Jaśkowiec, J.; Cichoń, C., Coupling of FEM and EFGM with dynamic decomposition in 2D quasi-brittle crack growth analysis, Comput. Assist. Mech. Eng. Sci., 11, 293-320 (2004) · Zbl 1102.74042 [7] Hegen, D., Element-free Galerkin methods in combination with finite element approaches, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 135, 143-166 (1996) · Zbl 0893.73063 [8] Huerta, A.; Hernandez-Menez, S., Enrichment and coupling of the finite element and meshless methods, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 48, 1615-1630 (2000) [9] Karutz, H.; Chudoba, R.; Kratzig, W., Automatic adaptive generation of a coupled finite element/element free Galerkin discretization, Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 18, 1075-1091 (2002) · Zbl 0997.65136 [10] Ullah, Z.; Coombs, W.; Augarde, C., An adaptive finite element/meshless coupled method based on local maximum entropy shape functions for linear and nonlinear problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 267, 0, 111-132 (2013) · Zbl 1286.74111 [11] Zienkiewicz, O.; Taylor, R.; Zhu, J., (The Finite Element Method Set (Sixth Edition) Its Basis and Fundamentals (2006), Springer-Verlag) [12] Jensen, P. S., Finite difference techniques for variable grids, Comput. Struct., 2, 1-2, 17-29 (1972) [13] Liszka, T.; Orkisz, J., The finite difference method at arbitrary irregular grids and its application in applied mechanics, Comput. Struct., 11, 1-2, 83-95 (1980), Special Issue-Computational Methods in Nonlinear Mechanics · Zbl 0427.73077 [14] Orkisz, J., (Finite Difference Method (Part III). Finite Difference Method (Part III), Handbook of Computational Solid Mechanics (1998), Springer-Verlag) [15] Milewski, S., Meshless finite difference method with higher order approximation—applications in mechanics, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 19, 1, 1-49 (2012) · Zbl 1354.74313 [16] Belytschko, T.; Krongauz, Y.; Organ, D.; Fleming, M.; Krysl, P., Meshless methods: An overview and recent developments, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 139, 1-4, 3-47 (1996) · Zbl 0891.73075 [17] Atluri, S.; Shen, S., The Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) Method (2002), Tech Sciene Press · Zbl 1012.65116 [18] Li, S.; Liu, W., Meshfree and particle methods and their applications, Appl. Mech. Rev., 55, 1-34 (2002) [21] Xiao, Q.; Dhanasekar, M., Coupling of FE and EFG using collocation approach, Adv. Eng. Softw., 33, 507-515 (2002) · Zbl 1024.65113 [22] Lacroix, D.; Bouillard, Ph., Improved sensitivity analysis by a coupled FE-EFG methods, Comput. Struct., 2431-2439 (2003) [23] Cichoń, C.; Jaśkowiec, J., Coupling generalized FC model to meshless EFG method for crack growth analysis in quasi-brittle materials, Comput. Assist. Mech. Eng. Sci., 8, 4, 543-556 (2001) · Zbl 1081.74559 [24] Milewski, S.; Orkisz, J., Improvements in the global a-posteriori error estimation of the FEM and MFDM solutions, Comput. Inf., 30, 3, 639-653 (2011) · Zbl 1399.65261 [25] Kumar, S.; Singh, I.; Mishra, B., A coupled finite element and element-free Galerkin approach for the simulation of stable crack growth in ductile materials, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 70, 0, 49-58 (2014) [26] Pathak, H.; Singh, A.; Singh, I. V., Simulation of 3-d thermo-elastic fracture problems using coupled FE-EFG approach, 3rd International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterisation. 3rd International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterisation, ICMPC 2014. 3rd International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterisation. 3rd International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterisation, ICMPC 2014, Procedia Mater. Sci., 6, 0, 1927-1935 (2014) [27] Arroyo, M.; Ortiz, M., Local maximum-entropy approximation schemes: a seamless bridge between finite elements and meshfree methods, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 65, 13, 2167-2202 (2006) · Zbl 1146.74048 [28] Jaśkowiec, J.; van der Meer, F. P., A consistent iterative scheme for 2D and 3D cohesive crack analysis in XFEM, Comput. Struct., 136, 98-107 (2014) [29] Liszka, T., An interpolation method for an irregular net of nodes, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 20, 9, 1599-1612 (1984) · Zbl 0544.65006 [30] Milewski, S., Selected computational aspects of the meshless finite difference method, Numer. Algorithms, 63, 1, 107-126 (2013) · Zbl 1267.65156 [31] Gingold, R.; Monaghan, J., Smoothed particle hydrodynamics theory and application to non-spherical stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 181, 375-389 (1977) · Zbl 0421.76032 [32] Liu, G.; Liu, M., Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: A Meshfree Particle Method (2003), World Scientific: World Scientific Singapore · Zbl 1046.76001 [33] Liu, W.; Jun, S.; Zhang, Y. F., Reproducing kernel particle methods, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 20, 1081-1106 (1995) · Zbl 0881.76072 [34] Belytschko, T.; Lu, Y.; Gu, L., Element-free Galerkin methods, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 37, 2, 229-256 (1994) · Zbl 0796.73077 [35] Onate, E.; Idelsohn, S.; Zienkiewicz, O.; Taylor, R., A finite point method in computational mechanics—applicatiots to convective transport and fluid flow, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 39, 3839-3866 (1996) · Zbl 0884.76068 [36] Lancaster, P.; Salkauskas, K., Surfaces generated by moving least-squares method, Math. Comput., 155, 35, 141-158 (1981) · Zbl 0469.41005 [37] Lancaster, P.; Salkauskas, K., Curve and Surface Fitting (1990), Academic Press: Academic Press San Diego [38] Karmowski, W.; Orkisz, J., A physically based method of enhancement of experimental data—concepts, formulation and application to identification of residual stresses, Inverse Probl. Eng. Mech., 61-70 (1993) [39] Demkowicz, L.; Gopalakrishnan, J., A class of discontinuous Petrov-Galerkin methods. Part i: The transport equation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 199, 23-24, 1558-1572 (2010) · Zbl 1231.76142
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.