×

Thin-walled tubes under torsion: multi-objective optimal design. (English) Zbl 1433.74089

Summary: The lightweight design of a thin-walled tube under torsion is addressed in the paper. A multi-objective optimization approach is adopted to minimize the mass while maximizing the structural stiffness of the thin walled tube. Constraints on available room (maximum diameter), safety (admissible stress), elastic stability (buckling), minimum thickness (forced by manufacturing technologies) are included in the problem. The analytical solution of the multi-objective optimization problem is obtained by applying a relaxed formulation of the Fritz John conditions for Pareto-optimality. Relatively simple analytical expressions of the Pareto-optimal set are derived both in the design variables (tube diameter and wall thickness) and objective functions (mass and compliance) domain. Simple practical formulae are provided to the designer for the preliminary design of thin-walled tubes under torsion. Finally, the comparative lightweight design of tubes made from different materials is presented and an application of the derived formulae to a simple engineering problem is discussed.

MSC:

74P10 Optimization of other properties in solid mechanics
90C90 Applications of mathematical programming
90C29 Multi-objective and goal programming
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Ashby, M., Materials selection in mechanical design (2011), Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
[2] Askar S, Tiwari A (2009) Finding exact solutions for multi-objective optimisation problems using a symbolic algorithm. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, 18-21 May 2009, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Askar, S.; Tiwari, A., Finding innovative design principles for multiobjective optimization problems, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev, 41, 4, 554-559 (2011)
[4] Ballo, F.; Gobbi, M.; Previati, G., Optimal design of a beam subject to bending: a basic application, Meccanica, 52, 15, 3563-3576 (2017) · Zbl 1383.49053
[5] Banichuk, Nv, Introduction to optimization of structures (1990), New York: Springer, New York
[6] Björck, A., Numerical methods for least squares problems (1996), Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia · Zbl 0847.65023
[7] Crate H, Batdorf S, Baab G (1944) The effect of internal pressure on the buckling stress of thin-walled circular cylinders under torsion. Technical Report L4E27, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Field, VA, USA
[8] Donnell L (1935) Stability of thin-walled tubes under torsion. Technical report 479, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Field, VA, USA
[9] Dutta, J.; Lalitha, Cs, Bounded sets of kkt multipliers in vector optimization, J Glob Optim, 36, 425-437 (2006) · Zbl 1120.90054
[10] Gobbi, M.; Mastinu, G., On the optimal design of composite material tubular helical springs, Meccanica, 36, 5, 525-553 (2001) · Zbl 1041.74055
[11] Gobbi, M.; Levi, F.; Mastinu, G., Multi-objective stochastic optimisation of the suspension system of road vehicles, J Sound Vib, 298, 1055-1072 (2006)
[12] Gobbi, M.; Levi, F.; Mastinu, G.; Previati, G., On the analytical derivation of the pareto-optimal set with an application to structural design, Struct Multidiscip Optim, 51, 3, 645-657 (2014)
[13] Gobbi, M.; Previati, G.; Ballo, F.; Mastinu, G., Bending of beams of arbitrary cross sections—optimal design by analytical formulae, Struct Multidiscip Optim, 55, 827-838 (2017)
[14] Haftka, R.; Gurdal, Z., Elements of structural optimization (2002), Dordrecht: Kluver, Dordrecht
[15] Kasperska, Rj; Magnucki, K.; Ostwald, M., Bicriteria optimization of cold-formed thin-walled beams with monosymmetrical open cross sections under pure bending, Thin Walled Struct, 45, 563-572 (2007)
[16] Kim, T.; Kim, Y., Multiobjective topology optimization of a beam under torsion and distortion, AIAA J, 40, 376-381 (2002)
[17] Kim, D.; Lee, G.; Lee, B.; Cho, S., Counterexample and optimality conditions in differentiable multiobjective programming, J Optim Theory Appl, 109, 187-192 (2001) · Zbl 1017.90099
[18] Levi F, Gobbi M (2006) An application of analytical multi-objective optimization to truss structures. In: 11th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, 6-8 September 2006, Portsmouth, Virginia
[19] Lundquist E (1934) Strength tests on thin-walled duralumin cylinders. Technical report 473, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Field, VA, USA
[20] Mastinu, G.; Gobbi, M.; Miano, C., Optimal design of complex mechanical systems (2006), Berlin: Springer, Berlin · Zbl 1099.74002
[21] Mastinu, G.; Previati, G.; Gobbi, M., Bending of lightweight circular tubes, Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci, 232, 7, 1165-1178 (2017)
[22] Miettinen, K., Nonlinear multiobjective optimization (1998), New York: Springer, New York
[23] Ostwald, M.; Rodak, M., Multicriteria optimization of cold-formed thin-walled beams with generalized open shape under different loads, Thin Walled Struct, 65, 26-33 (2013)
[24] Papalambros, P.; Wilde, D., Principles of optimal design. Modeling and computation (2000), Cambridge: Cambridge Universirty Press, Cambridge
[25] Previati G, Mastinu G, Gobbi M (2017) On the pareto optimality of Ashby’s selection method for beams under bending. J Mech Des 140(1):014,501. 10.1115/1.4038296. http://mechanicaldesign.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/article.aspx?
[26] Schwerin E (1924) Torsional stability of thin-walled tubes. In: Proceedings of the first international congress for applied mechanics at Delft, Netherlands, pp 255-265
[27] Wang, C., Optimization of torsion bars with rounded polygonal cross section, J Eng Mech, 139, 629-634 (2013)
[28] Young, W.; Budynas, R., Roark’s formulas for stress and strain (1989), New York: McGraw-Hill, New York
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.