Efficiency analysis of health insurers’ scale of operations and group affiliation with a perspective toward health insurers’ mergers and acquisitions effects. (English) Zbl 1429.91279

Summary: This research uses an indirect methodology to examine the effects of health insurance mergers and acquisitions by analyzing the impact of insurers’ scale of operations and group affiliation status on benefits, costs, and efficiency from the perspective of various stakeholders. The analysis can provide insights related to federal and state governments’ antitrust scrutiny and regulations, and can inform the public debate over mergers and acquisitions in the health insurance industry. We find that stakeholders in this process (consumers, regulators, health care providers, society at large) are inconsistent regarding the assessment of what constitutes efficiency with respect to scale of operations and group affiliation status, depending upon their viewpoint (choice) of most appropriate inputs and outputs to the health care market dynamics. In this study, big-sized insurers (those in the top 20% of insurers by member month enrollment) and small groups (those affiliated with a group with fewer than 10 member insurers) are the most efficient from the societal input-output perspective, From a composite perspective that combines the input-output choices relevant from the societal perspective and from the insurers’ perspective, big-sized insurers and big groups (those affiliated with a group with 10 or more member insurers) are found to be the most efficient. Additionally, we find most insurers are scale inefficient. The analysis of scale (dis)economies provides some guidelines regarding the appropriate scale of operations for the scale efficiency, and informs discussion of mergers and acquisitions among health insurers.


91G05 Actuarial mathematics


Full Text: DOI


[1] Aly, H.; Grabowski, R.; Pasurka, C.; Rangan., N., Technical, scale, and allocative efficiencies in U.S. banking: An empirical investigation, Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 211-18 (1990)
[2] Banker, R. D., Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: A statistical foundation, Management Science, 39, 1265-73 (1993) · Zbl 0798.90009
[3] Banker, R.; Charnes, A.; Cooper., W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 30, 9, 1078-92 (1984) · Zbl 0552.90055
[4] Banker, R. D.; Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W.; Swarts, J.; Thomas, D., An introduction to data envelopment analysis with some of its models and their uses, Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, 5, 125-63 (1989)
[5] Banker, R. D.; Natarajan., R., Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis, Operations Research, 56, 48-58 (2008) · Zbl 1167.90527
[6] Brockett, P. L.; Golany., B., Using rank statistics for determining programming efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis,, Management Science, 42, 3, 466-72 (1996) · Zbl 0881.90002
[7] Brockett, P.; Chang, R.; Rousseau, J.; Semple, J.; Yang., C., A comparison of HMO efficiencies as a function of provider autonomy, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 71, 1-19 (2004)
[8] Brockett, P.; Cooper, W.; Golden, L.; Rousseau, J.; Wang., Y., Financial intermediary versus production approach to efficiency of marketing, distribution systems, and organizational structure of insurance companies, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 72, 393-412 (2005)
[9] Brockett, P.; Golden, L.; Yang, C., Potential savings of Medicare: The analysis of Medicare Advantage and Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), North American Actuarial Journal, 22, 3, 458-72 (2018) · Zbl 06959516
[10] Charnes, A.; Cooper., W., Programming with linear fractional functionals, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly,, 9, 181-86 (1962) · Zbl 0127.36901
[11] Charnes, A.; Cooper, W.; Rhodes., E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-44 (1978) · Zbl 0416.90080
[12] Cooper, W.; Seiford, L.; Tone, K., Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, and references and DEA solver software (2007), Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA · Zbl 1111.90001
[13] Cummins, D.; Xie., X., Mergers and acquisitions in the US property liability insurance industry: Productivity and efficiency effects, Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 1, 30-55 (2008)
[14] Cummins, D.; Xie., X., Efficiency, productivity, and scale economies in the U.S. property-liability insurance industry,, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 39, 2, 141-64 (2013)
[15] Cummins, J. D.; Weiss, M.; Dionne, G., Handbook of insurance, Analyzing firm performance in the insurance industry using frontier efficiency and productivity method, 767-829 (2013), New York, NY: Springer, New York, NY
[16] Emrouznejad, A.; Yang., G., A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978-2016, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 1, 1-5 (2018)
[17] Frankfurter, G. M.; Mcgoun., E., The event study: An industrial strength method, International Review of Financial Analysis, 2, 121-41 (1993)
[18] Frankfurter, G. M.; Mcgoun., E., The event study: Is it either?, Journal of Investing, 4, 8-16 (1995)
[19] Grosskopf, S., Statistical inference and nonparametric efficiency: A selective survey, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 161-76 (1996)
[20] Hollingsworth, B., Non-parametric and parametric applications measuring efficiency in health care, Health Care Management Science, 6, 4, 203-18 (2003)
[21] Hollingsworth, B., The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery, Health Economics, 17, 10, 1107-28 (2008)
[22] Hollingsworth, B., Revolution, evolution, or status quo? Guidelines for efficiency measurement in health care, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 37, 1, 1-5 (2012)
[23] Hollingsworth, B.; Cylus, J.; Papanicolas, I.; Smith, P. C., Health system efficiency: How to make measurement matter for policy and management, Health system efficiency: Measurement and policy, 99-114 (2016), Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Copenhagen
[24] Kao, C.; Hwang., S., Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan, European Journal of Operational Research, 185, 1, 4168-429 (2008) · Zbl 1137.91497
[25] Karaca-Mandic, P.; Abraham, J.; Simon., K., Is the medical loss ratio a good target measure for regulation in the individual market for health insurance?, Health Economics, 24, 55-74 (2015)
[26] Lovell, C.; Pastor., J., Units invariance and translation invariant DEA models, Operations Research Letters, 18, 3, 147-51 (1995) · Zbl 0855.90004
[27] Nunamaker, T., Measuring routine nursing service efficiency: A comparison of cost per patient day and data envelopment analysis models, Health Services Research, 18, 2, 183-208 (1983)
[28] Schulman, K.; Richman., B., Reassessing ACOs and health care reform, Journal of the American Medical Association, 316, 7, 707-8 (2016)
[29] Xie, X., Are publicly held firms less efficient?: Evidence from the US property-liability insurance industry, Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 1549-63 (2010)
[30] Yang, C., Health care reform, efficiency of health insurers, and optimal health insurance markets, North American Actuarial Journal, 18, 4, 478-500 (2014) · Zbl 1414.91244
[31] Yang, C.; Lin, H., The (mis)alignment of health insurers’ efficiency measures from different perspectives and their (un)linkage with financial ratios and asset allocation, Journal of Insurance Regulation, 36, 175-95 (2017)
[32] Yang, C.; Wen., M., An efficiency-based approach to determining potential cost savings and profit targets for health insurers: The case of Obamacare health insurance CO-OPs, North American Actuarial Journal, 21, 2, 305-21 (2017) · Zbl 1414.91245
[33] Zhu, J., Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets (2009), New York, NY: Springer, New York, NY · Zbl 1180.90002
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.