zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Studies of dynamic crack propagation and crack branching with peridynamics. (English) Zbl 1425.74416
Summary: In this paper we discuss the peridynamic analysis of dynamic crack branching in brittle materials and show results of convergence studies under uniform grid refinement (\(m\)-convergence) and under decreasing the peridynamic horizon (\(\delta \)-convergence). Comparisons with experimentally obtained values are made for the crack-tip propagation speed with three different peridynamic horizons. We also analyze the influence of the particular shape of the micro-modulus function and of different materials (Duran 50 glass and soda-lime glass) on the crack propagation behavior. We show that the peridynamic solution for this problem captures all the main features, observed experimentally, of dynamic crack propagation and branching, as well as it obtains crack propagation speeds that compare well, qualitatively and quantitatively, with experimental results published in the literature. The branching patterns also correlate remarkably well with tests published in the literature that show several branching levels at higher stress levels reached when the initial notch starts propagating. We notice the strong influence reflecting stress waves from the boundaries have on the shape and structure of the crack paths in dynamic fracture. All these computational solutions are obtained by using the minimum amount of input information: density, elastic stiffness, and constant fracture energy. No special criteria for crack propagation, crack curving, or crack branching are used: dynamic crack propagation is obtained here as part of the solution. We conclude that peridynamics is a reliable formulation for modeling dynamic crack propagation.

74R10 Brittle fracture
74H15 Numerical approximation of solutions of dynamical problems in solid mechanics
74S30 Other numerical methods in solid mechanics (MSC2010)
PDF BibTeX Cite
Full Text: DOI
[1] Belytschko T, Chen H, Xu J, Zi G (2003) Dynamic crack propagation based on loss of hyperbolicity and a new discontinuous enrichment. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58: 1873–1905 · Zbl 1032.74662
[2] Bobaru F, Yang M, Alves LF, Silling SA, Askari E, Xu J (2009) Convergence, adaptive refinement, and scaling in 1D peridynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 77: 852–877 · Zbl 1156.74399
[3] Bolander JE Jr., Saito S (1998) Fracture analyses using spring networks with random geometry. Eng Fract Mech 61: 569–591
[4] Bowden FP, Brunton JH, Field JE, Heyes AD (1967) Controlled fracture of brittle solids and interruption of electrical current. Nature 216: 38–42
[5] Buehler MJ, Abraham FF, Gao H (2003) Hyperelasticity governs dynamic fracture at a critical length scale. Nature 426: 141–146
[6] Camacho GT, Ortiz M (1996) Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33: 2899–2938 · Zbl 0929.74101
[7] Cox BN, Gao H, Gross D, Rittel D (2005) Review: modern topics and challenges in dynamic fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 53: 565–596 · Zbl 1122.74487
[8] Döll W (1975) Investigations of the crack branching energy. Int J Fract 11: 184–186
[9] Field JE (1971) Brittle fracture: its study and application. Contemp Phys 12(1): 1–31
[10] Graff KF (1975) Wave motion in elastic solids. Dover, New York · Zbl 0314.73022
[11] Ha YD, Bobaru F (2009) Traction boundary conditions in peridynamics: a convergence study. Technical report Department of Engineering Mechanics, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska
[12] Ha YD, Bobaru F (2010) The effect of damage-dependent fracture energy on symmetry-breaking in dynamic brittle fracture. Technical report, Department of Engineering Mechanics, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska.
[13] Ha YD, Bobaru F, Parks ML (2010) Dynamic brittle fracture: crack branching predictions with peridynamics (submitted)
[14] Hairer E, Lubich C, Wanner G (2003) Geometric numerical integration illustrated by the Störmer/Verlet method. Acta Numer, 1–51 · Zbl 1046.65110
[15] Livne A, Ben-David O, Fineberg J (2007) Oscillations in rapid fracture. Phys Rev Lett 98(12): 124301
[16] Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44: 1267–1282 · Zbl 0932.74067
[17] Rabczuk T, Belytschko T (2004) Cracking particles: a simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61: 2316–2343 · Zbl 1075.74703
[18] Ramulu M, Kobayashi AS (1985) Mechanics of crack curving and branching–a dynamic fracture analysis. Int J Fract 27: 187–201
[19] Ravi-Chandar K (1998) Dynamic fracture of nominally brittle materials. Int J Fract 90: 83–102
[20] Ravi-Chandar K, Knauss WG (1984a) An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: III. On steady-state crack propagation and crack branching. Int J Fract 26: 141–154
[21] Ravi-Chandar K, Knauss WG (1984b) An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: IV. On the interaction of stress waves with propagating cracks. Int J Fract 26: 189–200
[22] Silling SA (2000) Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solids 48: 175–209 · Zbl 0970.74030
[23] Silling SA (2005) Fragmentation modeling with EMU. Technical report, Computational Physics Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico
[24] Silling SA, Askari E (2005) A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct 83: 1526–2535
[25] Silling SA, Demmie P, Warren TL (2007a) Peridynamic simulation of high-rate material failure, 2007 ASME applied mechanics and materials conference, Austin, TX, June 6
[26] Silling SA, Epton M, Weckner O, Xu J, Askari E (2007b) Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling. J Elast 88: 151–184 · Zbl 1120.74003
[27] Silling SA, Lehoucq RB (2008) Convergence of peridynamics to classical elasticity theory. J Elast 93: 13–37 · Zbl 1159.74316
[28] Silling SA, Weckner O, Askari E, Bobaru F (2009) Crack nucleation in a peridynamic solid. Int J Fract (this issue) · Zbl 1425.74045
[29] Song J, Areias PMA, Belytschko T (2006) A method for dynamic crack and shear band propagation with phantom nodes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 67: 868–893 · Zbl 1113.74078
[30] Song JH, Wang H, Belytschko T (2008) A comparative study on finite element methods for dynamic fracture. Comput Mech 42: 239–250 · Zbl 1160.74048
[31] Streit R, Finnie I (1980) An experimental investigation of crack-path directional stability. Exp Mech 20: 17–23
[32] Xie W (2005) Peridynamic flux-corrected transport algorithm for shock wave studies. Master thesis, Department of Engineering Mechanics, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska
[33] Xu XP, Needleman A (1994) Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42: 1397–1434 · Zbl 0825.73579
[34] Zhou F, Molinari JF (2004) Dynamic crack propagation with cohesive elements: a methodology to address mesh dependency. Int J Numer Methods Eng 59: 1–24 · Zbl 1047.74074
[35] Zhou SJ, Lomdahl PS, Thomson R, Holian BL (1996) Dynamic crack processes via molecular dynamics. Phys Rev Lett 76(13): 2318–2321
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.