Solvency II is not risk-based – could it be? Evidence from non-life calibrations. (English) Zbl 1416.91176

Summary: Risk-based prudential regulations are spreading. For example, the capital requirements of Solvency II are considered to be founded on a risk measure. We focus on premium and reserving risks, which represent 40% of capital requirements for non-life insurance companies in Europe, and draw on internal robustness tests to demonstrate that these measures are unreliable. There are three possible explanations for this lack of reliability: a political economy factor, an idiosyncratic factor, and an epistemological barrier. We examine each of these and evaluate their significance, thus casting doubts on the feasibility of such ambition and providing insights to adapt the design of any prudential regulation intended to be risk-based to such pitfalls.


91B30 Risk theory, insurance (MSC2010)
Full Text: DOI


[1] Solvabilité 2: principaux enseignements de la cinquième étude quantitative d’impact (QIS5), Analyses et synthèses, 1, (2011)
[2] Alesina, A.; Tabellini, G., Bureaucrats or politicians? part I: A single policy task, American Economic Review, 97, 1, 169-179, (2007)
[3] Quantitative impact study 2 technical specification. Frankfurt am mein: CEIOPS-PI-08/06, (2006)
[4] QIS3 technical specifications, part I: instructions. Frankfurt am mein: CEIOPS-FS-11/07, (2007)
[5] QIS3 calibration of the underwriting risk, market risk and MCR. Frankfurt am mein: CEIOPS-FS-14/07, (2007)
[6] QIS4 background document: calibration of SCR and MCR. CEIOPS-DOC-02/2008., (2008)
[7] Draft CEIOPS’ advice for level 2 implementing measures on solvency II: SCR standard formula calibration of non-life underwriting risk. Frankfurt am mein: CEIOPS-CP-71-09, (2009)
[8] Solvency II calibration paper. Frankfurt am mein: CEIOPS-SEC-40-10, (2010)
[9] Cummins, J.; Phillips, R., Capital adequacy and insurance risk-based capital systems, Journal of Insurance Regulation, 28, 1, 25-72, (2009)
[10] Danielsson, J., The emperor has no clothes: limits to risk modelling, Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 7, 1273-1296, (2002)
[11] Danıelsson, J., Blame the models, Journal of Financial Stability, 4, 4, 321-328, (2008)
[12] Technical Specifications QIS4. MARKT/2505/08, (2008), EC, Brussels
[13] QIS5 Technical Specifications, (2010), EC, Brussels
[14] El Karoui, N.; Loisel, S.; Prigent, J.-L.; Vedani, J., J., Market inconsistencies of the market-consistent European life insurance economic valuations: pitfalls and practical solutions, (2015) · Zbl 1394.91233
[15] Eling, M.; Holzmüller, I., An overview and comparison of risk-based capital standards, Journal of Insurance Regulation, 26, 4, 31-60, (2008)
[16] Embrechts, P.; Puccetti, G.; Rüschendorf, L., Model uncertainty and var aggregation, Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, 2750-2764, (2013)
[17] Directive 2009/138/CE du parlement européen et du conseil du 25 novembre 2009 sur l’accès aux activités de l’assurance et de la réassurance et leur exercice (solvabilité II), OJ L, 335, 1-155, (2009)
[18] Frezal, S.; Haguet, E.; Nou, V., With-profit contracts regulation and procyclicality: A comparative analysis of alternative approaches, (2016)
[19] Harrison, M.; Samuel, S., Two hundreds millions inputs, Can You Trust Risk Weightings at European Banks? Barclays Capital Equity Research, (2011)
[20] Kamega, A.; Planchet, F., Construction de tables de mortalité prospectives sur un groupe restreint: mesure du risque d’estimation, Bulletin français d’actuariat, 13, 25, 5-33, (2013)
[21] Leroy, G.; Planchet, F., Que signifie la ruine dans solvabilité 2?, La Tribune de l’assurance, 147, 55-56, (2010)
[22] Pfeifer, D.; Becker, C.; Fried, R.; Kuhnt, S., Robustness and Complex Data Structures: Festschrift in Honour of Ursula Gather, Correlation, tail dependence and diversification, 301-314, (2013), Springer, Berlin
[23] Pfeifer, D.; Strassburger, D., Solvency II: stability problems with the SCR aggregation formula, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1, 61-77, (2008) · Zbl 1164.91036
[24] Puccetti, G.; Rüschendorf, L., Bounds for joint portfolios of dependent risks, Statistics & Risk Modeling, 29, 107-132, (2012)
[25] Comparing flat and risk-based capital requirements, (2014)
[26] Sims, C., Implications of rational inattention, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 3, 665-690, (2003)
[27] Weber, R.; Darbellay, A., The regulatory use of credit ratings in bank capital requirement regulations, Journal of Banking Regulation, 10, 1, 1-16, (2008)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.