##
**Optimal risk transfer: a numerical optimization approach.**
*(English)*
Zbl 1416.91149

Summary: Capital efficiency and asset/liability management are part of the enterprise risk management process of any insurance/reinsurance conglomerate and serve as quantitative methods to fulfill the strategic planning within an insurance organization. A considerable amount of work has been done in this ample research field, but invariably one of the last questions is whether or not, numerically, the method is practically implementable, which is our main interest. The numerical issues are dependent on the traits of the optimization problem, and therefore we plan to focus on the optimal reinsurance design, which has been a very dynamic topic in the last decade. The existing literature is focused on finding closed-form solutions that are usually possible when economic, solvency, and other constraints are not included in the model. Including these constraints, the optimal contract can be found only numerically. The efficiency of these methods is extremely good for some well-behaved convex problems, such as second-order conic problems. Specific numerical solutions are provided to better explain the advantages of appropriate numerical optimization methods chosen to solve various risk transfer problems. The stability issues are also investigated together with a case study performed for an insurance group that aims capital efficiency across the entire organization.

### MSC:

91B30 | Risk theory, insurance (MSC2010) |

91G60 | Numerical methods (including Monte Carlo methods) |

65K10 | Numerical optimization and variational techniques |

PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{A. V. Asimit} et al., N. Am. Actuar. J. 22, No. 3, 341--364 (2018; Zbl 1416.91149)

### References:

[1] | Aase, K. K., Perspectives of risk sharing, Scandinavian actuarial, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Issue 2, 73-128, (2002) · Zbl 1015.62104 |

[2] | Acerbi, C.; Tasche, D., On the coherence of expected shortfall, Journal of Banking & Finance, 26, 7, 1487-1503, (2002) |

[3] | Adler, I.; Alizadeh, F., Primal-dual interior point algorithms for convex quadratically constrained and semidefinite optimization problems, (1995) |

[4] | Alizadeh, F.; Goldfard, D., Second-order cone optimization, Mathematical Programming Series B, 95, 3-51, (2003) · Zbl 1153.90522 |

[5] | Alizadeh, F.; Haeberly, J. P.; Overton, M. L., Primal-dual interior-point methods for semidefinite programming: convergence rates, stability and numerical results, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 8, 3, 746-768, (1998) · Zbl 0911.65047 |

[6] | Alizadeh, F.; Schmieta, S. H., Optimization with semidefinite, quadratic and linear constraints, (1997) |

[7] | Arrow, K. J., Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care, American Economic Review, 53, 5, 941-973, (1963) |

[8] | Artzner, P.; Delbaen, F.; Eber, J.-M.; Heath, D., Coherent measures of risk, Mathematical Finance, 9, 3, 203-228, (1999) · Zbl 0980.91042 |

[9] | Asimit, A. V.; Badescu, A. M.; Cheung, K. C., Optimal reinsurance in the presence of counterparty default risk, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53, 3, 690-697, (2013) · Zbl 1290.91074 |

[10] | Asimit, V.; Badescu, A. M.; Haberman, S.; Kim, E.-S., Efficient risk allocation within a non-life insurance group under solvency II regime, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 66, 69-76, (2016) · Zbl 1348.91126 |

[11] | Asimit, A. V.; Badescu, A. M.; Tsanakas, A., Optimal risk transfers in insurance groups, European Actuarial Journal, 3, 159-190, (2013) · Zbl 1270.91028 |

[12] | Asimit, A. V.; Badescu, A. M.; Verdonck, T., Optimal risk transfer under quantile-based risk measures, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53, 1, 252-265, (2013) · Zbl 1284.91199 |

[13] | Asimit, A. V.; Bignozzi, V.; Cheung, K. C.; Hu, J.; Kim, E.-S., (2017) |

[14] | Balbás, A.; Balbás, B.; Balbás, R.; Heras, A., Optimal reinsurance under risk and uncertainty, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 60, 61-74, (2015) · Zbl 1308.91075 |

[15] | Bernard, C.; Ludkovski, M., Impact of counterparty risk on the reinsurance market, North American Actuarial Journal, 16, 1, 87-111, (2012) · Zbl 1291.91091 |

[16] | Borch, K., An attempt to determine the optimum amount of stop loss reinsurance, Transactions of the 16th International Congress of Actuaries, I, 597-610, (1960) |

[17] | Cai, J.; Lemieux, C.; Liu, F. D., Optimal reinsurance with regulatory initial capital and default risk, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 57, 13-24, (2014) · Zbl 1304.91094 |

[18] | Cai, J.; Tan, K. S., Optimal retention for a stop-loss reinsurance under the var and CTE risk measures, Astin Bulletin, 37, 1, 93-112, (2007) · Zbl 1162.91402 |

[19] | Cai, J.; Tan, K. S.; Weng, C.; Zhang, Y., Optimal reinsurance under var and CTE risk measures, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 43, 1, 185-196, (2008) · Zbl 1140.91417 |

[20] | Cai, J.; Wei, W., Optimal reinsurance with positively dependent risks, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 50, 1, 57-63, (2012) · Zbl 1239.91075 |

[21] | Cheung, K. C., Optimal reinsurance revisited - A geometric approach, Astin Bulletin, 40, 1, 221-239, (2010) · Zbl 1230.91070 |

[22] | Cui, W.; Yang, J.; Wu, L., Optimal reinsurance minimising the distortion risk measure under general reinsurance premium principles, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53, 1, 74-85, (2013) · Zbl 1284.91222 |

[23] | Fischer, T., Risk capital allocation by coherent risk measures based on one-sided moments, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 32, 1, 135-146, (2003) · Zbl 1055.91048 |

[24] | Gajek, L.; Zagrodny, D., Insurer’s optimal reinsurance strategies, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 27, 1, 105-112, (2000) · Zbl 0964.62099 |

[25] | Jouini, E.; Schachermayer, W.; Touzi, N., Optimal risk sharing for law-invariant monetary utility functions, Mathematical Finance, 18, 2, 269-292, (2008) · Zbl 1133.91360 |

[26] | Kaluszka, M., Optimal reinsurance under mean-variance premium principles, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 28, 1, 61-67, (2001) · Zbl 1009.62096 |

[27] | Kaluszka, M., Mean-variance optimal reinsurance arrangements, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Issue 1, 28-41, (2004) · Zbl 1117.62115 |

[28] | Lobo, M. S.; Vandenberghe, L.; Boyd, S.; Lebret, H., Applications of the second-order cone programming, Linear Algebra and Applications, 284, 193-228, (1998) · Zbl 0946.90050 |

[29] | Monteiro, R. D. C.; Tsuchiya, T., Polynomial convergence of primal-dual algorithms for the second-order cone program based on the MZ-family of directions, Mathematical Programming, 88, 61-83, (2000) · Zbl 0967.65077 |

[30] | Nelsen, R. B., An Introduction to Copulas, (2006), Springer-Verlag, New York · Zbl 1152.62030 |

[31] | Nesterov, Y. E.; Todd, M. J., Self-scaled barriers and interior-point methods for convex programming, Mathematics of Operations Research, 22, 1-42, (1997) · Zbl 0871.90064 |

[32] | Nesterov, Y. E.; Todd, M. J., Primal-dual interior-point methods for self-scaled cones, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 8, 324-364, (1998) · Zbl 0922.90110 |

[33] | Rockafeller, R. T.; Uryasev, S., Optimization of conditional value-at-risk, Journal of Risk, 2, 21-41, (2000) |

[34] | Tan, K.; Weng, C., Empirical approach for optimal reinsurance design, North American Actuarial Journal, 18, 2, 315-342, (2014) |

[35] | Tao, P. D.; An, L. T. H., A D.C. optimization algorithm for solving the trust-region subproblem, SIAM Journal of Optimization, 8, 2, 476-505, (1998) · Zbl 0913.65054 |

[36] | Wang, S. S.; Young, V. R.; Panjer, H. H., Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 21, 2, 173-183, (1997) · Zbl 0959.62099 |

[37] | Wozabal, D.; Hochreiter, R.; Pflug, G., A D.C. formulation of value-at-risk constrained optimization, Optimization, 59, 3, 377-400, (2010) · Zbl 1196.90088 |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.