×

Weighted temporal utility. (English) Zbl 1416.91115

Summary: This paper considers preferences over risky timed outcomes and proposes the weighted temporal utility (WTU) model which separates anticipated subjective evaluations of outcomes from attitudes toward psychological distance induced by risks and delays. Anticipating the subjective evaluation of an outcome requires the decision maker to project himself to the future and to imagine how much he will appreciate the outcome once he receives it. This projection may, but need not, be accurate. We provide a characterization of the WTU model in a static setting and propose a nonparametric method to measure its weighting and utility functions. We also consider a dynamic setting which allows for a varying decision time. The dynamic WTU model can accommodate the standard discounted expected utility model as well as observed deviations from stationarity, time invariance, and time consistency. It therefore enhances our understanding of the drivers of these behavioral phenomena.

MSC:

91B16 Utility theory
91B08 Individual preferences
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Abdellaoui, M, Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions, Manag. Sci., 46, 1497-1512, (2000) · Zbl 1232.91114 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1497.12080
[2] Abdellaoui, M; Diecidue, E; Öncüler, A, Risk preferences at different time periods: an experimental investigation, Manag. Sci., 57, 975-987, (2011) · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1324
[3] Ambrus, A., Ásgeirsdóttir, T.L., Noor, J., Sándor, L.: Compensated discount functions: an experiment on the influence of expected income on time preference. Working Paper (2015)
[4] Andreoni, J; Sprenger, C, Risk preferences are not time preferences, Am. Econ. Rev., 102, 3357-3376, (2012) · doi:10.1257/aer.102.7.3357
[5] Andreoni, J; Sprenger, C, Risk preferences are not time preferences: reply, Am. Econ. Rev., 105, 2287-2293, (2015) · doi:10.1257/aer.20150311
[6] Baucells, M; Heukamp, FH, Probability and time trade-off, Manag. Sci., 58, 831-842, (2012) · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1450
[7] Bommier, A, Uncertain lifetime and intertemporal choice: risk aversion as a rationale for time discounting, Int. Econ. Rev., 47, 1223-1246, (2006) · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00411.x
[8] Cheung, S, Comment on “risk preferences are not time preferences”: on the elicitation of time preference under conditions of risk, Am. Econ. Rev., 105, 2242-2260, (2015) · doi:10.1257/aer.20120946
[9] Debreu, G; Arrow, KJ (ed.); Karlin, S (ed.); Suppes, P (ed.), Topological methods in cardinal utility theory, 16-26, (1960), Stanford, California · Zbl 0249.90005
[10] Epper, T; Fehr-Duda, H, Comment on “risk preferences are not time preferences”: balancing on a budget line, Am. Econ. Rev., 105, 2261-2271, (2015) · doi:10.1257/aer.20130420
[11] Epper, T., Fehr-Duda, H.: The missing link: unifying risk taking and time discounting. Working Paper (2015b)
[12] Epper, T; Fehr-Duda, H; Bruhin, A, Viewing the future through a warped Lens: why uncertainty generates hyperbolic discounting, J. Risk Uncertain., 43, 169-203, (2011) · doi:10.1007/s11166-011-9129-x
[13] Fishburn, PC; Rubinstein, A, Time preference, Int. Econ. Rev., 23, 677-694, (1982) · Zbl 0506.90004 · doi:10.2307/2526382
[14] Frederick, S; Loewenstein, G; O’Donoghue, T, Time discounting and time preference: a critical review, J. Econ. Lit., 40, 351-401, (2002) · doi:10.1257/jel.40.2.351
[15] Gerber, A; Rohde, KIM, Risk and preference reversals in intertemporal choice, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 76, 654-668, (2010) · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.09.005
[16] Gerber, A; Rohde, KIM, Eliciting discount functions when baseline consumption changes over time, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 116, 56-64, (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.03.019
[17] Gilboa, I; Postlewaite, A; Samuelson, L, Memorable consumption, J. Econ. Theory, 165, 414-455, (2016) · Zbl 1371.91057 · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2016.05.004
[18] Halevy, Y, Strotz meets allais: diminishing impatience and the certainty effect, Am. Econ. Rev., 98, 1145-1162, (2008) · doi:10.1257/aer.98.3.1145
[19] Halevy, Y, Time consistency: stationarity and time invariance, Econometrica, 83, 335-352, (2015) · Zbl 1419.91190 · doi:10.3982/ECTA10872
[20] Harvey, CM, Value functions for infinite-period planning, Manag. Sci., 32, 1123-1139, (1986) · Zbl 0602.90036 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.9.1123
[21] Harvey, CM, Proportional discounting of future costs and benefits, Math. Oper. Res., 20, 381-399, (1995) · Zbl 0831.90011 · doi:10.1287/moor.20.2.381
[22] Karni, E; Safra, Z, The hexagon condition and additive representation for two dimensions: an algebraic approach, J. Math. Psychol., 42, 393-399, (1998) · Zbl 1073.91630 · doi:10.1006/jmps.1998.1204
[23] Keren, G; Roelofsma, P, Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 63, 287-297, (1995) · doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1080
[24] Loewenstein, G; O’Donoghue, T; Matthew, R, Projection bias in predicting future utility, Q. J. Econ., 118, 1209-1248, (2003) · Zbl 1062.91018 · doi:10.1162/003355303322552784
[25] Loewenstein, G; Prelec, D, Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation, Q. J. Econ., 107, 573-597, (1992) · doi:10.2307/2118482
[26] Mazur, JE; Mazur, JE (ed.); Commons, ML (ed.); Nevin, JA (ed.); Rachlin, H (ed.), An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement, 55-73, (1987), Hillsdale, NJ
[27] Miao, B; Zhong, S, Comment on “risk preferences are not time preferences”: separating risk and time preference, Am. Econ. Rev., 105, 2272-2286, (2015) · doi:10.1257/aer.20131183
[28] Noor, J, Hyperbolic discounting and the standard model: eliciting discount functions, J. Econ. Theory, 144, 2077-2083, (2009) · Zbl 1195.91043 · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2009.03.005
[29] Phelps, ES; Pollak, RA, On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth, Rev. Econ. Stud., 35, 185-199, (1968) · doi:10.2307/2296547
[30] Prelec, D; Loewenstein, G, Decision making over time and under uncertainty: a common approach, Manag. Sci., 37, 770-786, (1991) · Zbl 0736.90001 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.37.7.770
[31] Takahashi, T; Oono, H; Radford, MHB, Psychophysics of time perception and intertemporal choice models, Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl., 387, 2066-2074, (2008) · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2007.11.047
[32] Takanori, I; Goto, R, Simultaneous measurement of time and risk preferences: stated preference discrete choice modeling analysis depending on smoking behavior, Int. Econ. Rev., 50, 1169-1182, (2009) · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2354.2009.00564.x
[33] Thomsen, G, Un teorema topologico sulle schiere di curve e una caratterizzione geometrica delle superficie isometro-asinttotiche, Bolletino della unione Matematica Italiana, 6, 80-85, (1927) · JFM 53.0653.02
[34] Trope, Y; Liberman, N, Construal-level theory of psychological distance, Psychol. Rev., 117, 440-463, (2010) · doi:10.1037/a0018963
[35] Wakker, P.: Additive Representations of Preferences, A New Foundation of Decision Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1989) · Zbl 0668.90001 · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7815-8
[36] Wakker, P; Deneffe, D, Eliciting von Neumann-morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown, Manag. Sci., 42, 1131-1150, (1996) · Zbl 0880.90008 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1131
[37] Zauberman, G; Kim, BK; Malkoc, SA; Bettman, JR, Discounting time and time discounting: subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences, J. Market. Res., 46, 543-556, (2009) · doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.4.543
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.