×

Introduction of a classical level in quantum theory. Continuous monitoring. (English) Zbl 1390.81055

This paper is written in the framework of a peculiar form of Generalized Quantum Mechanics (GQM) proposed years ago by the author’s group with the aim of describing a quantum measurement process encompassing also the “intrinsic classical level for some basic macroscopic quantities” needed to interpret “the setup and output of an experiment” according to Bohr and von Neumann. As recalled in a final annex, within the Heisenberg picture, to a set \(A\) of \(p\) compatible observables, and to \(T\subseteq\mathbb R^p\), are associated a positive operator valued measure \(\hat F_A(T)\) (an operator on the Hilbert space \(\mathbb H\)), and an operation valued measure \(\mathcal F_{S_A}(T)\) (a mapping among trace class operators) where \(S_A\) represents the observation apparatus. If then \(\hat\rho\) is the statistical operator (the state of the system), while the probability of observing \(A \in T\) at the time \(t\) is \[ P(A \in T, t) = \mathrm {Tr} [\hat F_A(T,t)\hat\rho] \] the reduction of the state as a consequence of having observed \(A \in T\) at the time \(t_0\) produces the new statistical operator \(\mathcal F_{S_A}(T,t_0)\hat\rho\) after suitable normalization. It can be shown moreover that “in GQM the observation of a sequence of results at certain successive times can be put on the same foot as the observation of \(A\) at a single time”
In the original papers “The idea was that certain basic quantities should be chosen once for ever by an additional postulate and they should be thought as having at any time well defined values, considered as beables in the sense of Bell, by treating them formally as continuously observed. Then any observation on a microscopic system should be expressed in terms of the modifications that its interaction with the remaining part of the world produces in the value of such basic macroscopic quantities. Obviously the theory remains statistic and to any possible evolution of the basic quantities a precise probability is assigned ...” Now, an integration over all possible histories of the basic quantities in a given time interval gives rise in the Heisenberg picture to the evolution equation \[ \frac{\partial\hat\rho(t)}{\partial t}=-\sum_j\frac{\alpha_j}{4}\left[\hat A^j(t),\left[\hat A^j(t),\hat\rho(t)\right]\right] \] where \(\alpha_j\) are positive constants. This theory however meets two main difficulties: “i) it is in conflict with basic conservation rules, specifically with energy conservation; ii) it does not seem it can be extended to relativistic field theories. Both these difficulties seem to be related to the requirement \(\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots\) to be positive.” The author’s aim in the present paper is than to show that “it is possible to release such requirement and significant models can be constructed in which ... a consistent positive probability distribution can be defined for the histories of the related basic quantities, the conservation rules respected and relativistic covariance achieved, when appropriate.”
To discuss the problem, first two elementary (pedagogical) models are considered: the harmonic oscillator, and the relativistic scalar field; and then the more significant case of the Spinor Quantum electrodynamics is addressed. In this latter case the previous evolution equation must be replaced by a Tomonaga-Schwinger-like equation with a dimensionless constant \(\gamma\) playing the role of “a new physical fundamental constant, that discriminates between classical and quantum scales.” In short the author claims that “[his] proposal corresponds to a specific choice of the ‘dissipative’ term in the Liouville-von Newman equation, dropping the positivity requirement at the price of restricting the class of the observables.”

MSC:

81P15 Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations
81P05 General and philosophical questions in quantum theory
81T99 Quantum field theory; related classical field theories
76F30 Renormalization and other field-theoretical methods for turbulence
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Barchielli, A., Lanz, L., Prosperi, G.M.: A model for macroscopic description and continuous observations in quantum mechanics. Nuovo Cimento B 72, 79-91 (1982)
[2] Barchielli, A., Lanz, L., Prosperi, G.M.: Statistics of continuos trajectories in quantum physics, operation valued stochastic processes. Found. Phys. 13, 779-812 (1983)
[3] Barchielli, A., Lanz, L., Prosperi, G.M.: Statistics of continuous trajectories and the interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. In: Proceedings of the ISQM, Tokyo, pp. 165-180 (1984)
[4] Prosperi, G.M.: The quantum measurement process and the observation of continuous trajectories. In: Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1055, pp. 301-326. Springer, Berlin (1984)
[5] Davis, E.B.: Quantum Theory of Open Systems. Academic Press, London (1976)
[6] Ludwig, G.: Foundation of Quantum Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (1982)
[7] Kraus, K.: States, effects and operations. In: Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 90. Springer, Berlin (1983) · Zbl 0545.46049
[8] Holevo, A.S.: Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory. North Holland, Amsterdam (1982) · Zbl 0497.46053
[9] Holevo, A.S.: Statistical Structure of Quantum Theory. Springer, Berlin (2001) · Zbl 0999.81001
[10] Heinosaari, T., Ziman, M.: The Mathematical Language of Quantum Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011) · Zbl 1243.81008
[11] Holevo, A.S.: Quantum Systems, Channels, Information: A Mathematical Introduction, Series: De Gruyter Studies in Mathematical Physics, vol. 16. Walter de Gruyter · Zbl 1332.81003
[12] Barchielli, A., Gregoratti, M.: Quantum Trajectories and measurement in Continuous Time. Spriger, Berlin (2009) · Zbl 1182.81001
[13] Grifths, R.: Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics. J. Stat. Phys. 36, 219-272 (1984) · Zbl 0586.60097
[14] Grifths, R.: Consistent Quantum Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
[15] Gell-Mann, M., Hartle, J.B.: Quantum Mechanics in the light of Quantum Cosmology. In: Kobayashi, S., Ezawa, H., Murayama, Y., Nomuda, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the ISQM, pp. 331-343. Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo (1990)
[16] Omnes, R.: Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics, I, II, III. J. Stat. Phys. 53, 893-975 (1988) · Zbl 0677.03042
[17] Omnes, R.: Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics. IV. Projectors in semiclassical physics. J. Stat. Phys. 57, 357-382 (1989)
[18] Omnes, R.: From Hilbert space to common sense, a synthesis of recent progress in the interpretation of quantum mechanics. Ann. Phys. N. Y. 201, 354-447 (1990)
[19] Omnes, R.: Consistent interpretation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 339-382 (1992)
[20] d’Espagnat, B.: Consistent histories and the measurement problem. Phys. Lett. A 124, 204-206 (1987)
[21] d’Espagnat, B.: Are realistically interpretable local theories? J. Stat. Phys. 56, 747-766 (1989)
[22] Dowker, H.F., Kent, A.: Properties of consistent histories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3038-3041 (1995)
[23] Dowker, H.F., Kent, A.: On the consistent approach to quantum mechanics. J. Stat. Phys. 82, 1575-1646 (1996) · Zbl 1042.81507
[24] Peruzzi, G., Rimini, A.: Incompatible and contradictory retrodiction in history approach to quantum mechanics. Found. Phys. Lett. 11, 201-207 (1998)
[25] Zeh, H.D.: On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory. Found. Phys. 1, 69-76 (1970)
[26] Joos, E., Zeh, H.D.: The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment. Z. Phys. B 59, 221-243 (1985)
[27] Zurek, W.H.: Decoherence, einselection and the quantum origins of the classical. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715-775 (2003) · Zbl 1205.81031
[28] Vacchini, B., Hornberger, K.: Quantum linear Boltzmann equation. Phys. Rep. 478, 71-120 (2009)
[29] Bassi, A., Ghirardi, G.C.: Dynamical reduction models. Phys. Rep. 379, 257-426 (2003) · Zbl 1034.81004
[30] Bassi, A., Lochan, K., Satin, S., Singh, T.P., Ulbricht, H.: Models of wave-functions collapse underlying theories and experimental tests. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 471-527 (2013)
[31] Ghirardi, G.C., Rimini, A., Weber, T.: Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic system. Phys. Rev. D 34, 470-491 (1986) · Zbl 1222.82047
[32] Ghirardi, G.C., Grassi, R., Benatti, F.: Describing the macroscopic world: closing the circle within the dynamical reduction program. Found. Phys. 25, 5-38 (1995) · Zbl 1222.81058
[33] Bassi, A., Ghirardi, G.C., Salvetti, D.G.M.: The Hilbert state operator formalism within dynamical reduction model. J. Phys. A 40, 13755-13772 (2007) · Zbl 1129.81001
[34] Pearl, P.: Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous localization. Phys. Rev. A 39, 2277-2289 (1989)
[35] Ghirardi, G.C., Pearl, P., Rimini, A.: Markov processes in Hilbert space and continuous spontaneous localization of systems of identical particles. Phys. Rev. A 42, 78-89 (1990)
[36] Adler, S.L.: Quantum Theory as a Emergent Phenomenon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004) · Zbl 1095.81002
[37] Diosi, L., Lukacs, B.: In favor of Newtonian quantum gravity. Annalen der Physik 44, 488-492 (1987)
[38] Diosi, L.: Intrinsic time-uncertanties and decoherence: comparison of 4 models. Braz. J. Phys. 35, 260-265 (2005)
[39] Prosperi, G.M.: Theory of measurement in quantum mechanics and macroscopic description. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 33, 115-131 (1994)
[40] Prosperi, G.M.: Theory of measurement and second quantization. AIP Conf. Proc. 461, 91-106 (1999)
[41] Caldirola, P.: The cronon in quantum theory of the electron and the existence of heavy leptons. Nuovo Cimento A 45, 549-579 (1978)
[42] Bonifacio, R.: Time as statistical variable and intrinsic decoherence. AIP Conf. Proc. 461, 122-128 (1999)
[43] Milburn, G.J.: Intrisic decoherence in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A 44, R5401-5406 (1991)
[44] Recami, E., Farias, R.H.A.: A simple (finite-difference) equation for dissipation and decoherence. Nuovo Cimento B 147, 765-776 (2009)
[45] Misra, B., Sudarshan, E.C.: The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory. J. Math. Phys. 18, 756-763 (1977)
[46] Gorini, V., Kossakorowski, A., Sudarshan, E.G.: Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems. J. Math. Phys. 17, 821-825 (1976) · Zbl 1446.47009
[47] Lindblad, G.: On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups. Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119-136 (1976) · Zbl 0343.47031
[48] Barchielli, A., Lupieri, G.: Quantum stochastic calculus, operation valued stochastic processes and continual measurement in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Phys 26, 2222-2230 (1985) · Zbl 0574.60060
[49] Abers, E.S., Lee, B.W.: Gauge theories. Phys. Rep. 9, 1-141 (1973)
[50] Feynman, R.P., Hibbs, A.R.: Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. Mac Craw-Hill, New York (1965) · Zbl 0176.54902
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.