×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Comparison of different imputing methods for scrambled responses. (English) Zbl 1365.62038
Chaudhuri, Arijit (ed.) et al., Data gathering, analysis and protection of privacy through randomized response techniques: qualitative and quantitative human traits. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland (ISBN 978-0-444-63570-9/hbk; 978-0-444-63571-6/ebook). Handbook of Statistics 34, 471-495 (2016).
Summary: In comparison to follow up a survey, the method of imputing nonresponses has been found to be much cheaper from the cost point of views. The problem of nonresponse in survey sampling has been widely discussed in direct question survey techniques. A very limited effort has been made if the responses are collected by using a randomized response device. In this paper, the problem of imputing scrambled responses will be considered by following S. Singh et al. [“Imputing and jackknifing scrambled responses”, Metron LXVI No. 2, 183–204 (2008), ftp://luna.sta.uniroma1.it/RePEc/articoli/2008-2-3.pdf] and Y. Zaizai et al. [Model Assist. Stat. Appl. 3, No. 2, 89–98 (2008; Zbl 1154.62015)].
For the entire collection see [Zbl 1349.62001].

MSC:
62D05 Sampling theory, sample surveys
94A62 Authentication, digital signatures and secret sharing
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI