Drop-the-losers design: binomial case.

*(English)*Zbl 1301.62115Summary: Drop-the-losers designs were introduced for normal distributions as a method of combining phase II and III clinical trials together under a single protocol with the purpose of more rapidly evaluating drugs by eliminating as much as possible the delays that typically occur between the two phases of clinical development. In the design, the sponsor would administer \(k\) treatments along with a control in the first stage. During a brief interim period, efficacy data would be used to select the best treatment (with a rule to deal with ties) for further evaluation against the control in a second stage. At the end of the study, data from both stages would be used to draw inferences about the selected treatment relative to the control with adjustments made for selection in between the two stages. Because the inferences are model based, exact confidence intervals can be determined for the parameter of interest. In the present case, the parameter of concern is the probability of a beneficial response that is dichotomous in nature.

##### MSC:

62P10 | Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis |

65C60 | Computational problems in statistics (MSC2010) |

PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{M. W. Sill} and \textit{A. R. Sampson}, Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 53, No. 3, 586--595 (2009; Zbl 1301.62115)

Full Text:
DOI

##### References:

[1] | Bauer, P., Discussion, Biom. J., 47, 269-270, (2005) |

[2] | Bauer, P.; Kieser, M., Combining different phases in the development of medical treatments within a single trial, Stat. med., 18, 1833-1848, (1999) |

[3] | Blume, J.D., Tutorial in biostatistics: likelihood methods for measuring statistical evidence, Stat. med., 21, 2563-2599, (2002) |

[4] | Bretz, F.; Strassburger, K.; Maurer, W., Discussion, Biom. J., 47, 274-275, (2005) |

[5] | Casella, G.; Berger, R.L., Statistical inference, (1990), Wadsworth, Inc. Belmont California · Zbl 0699.62001 |

[6] | Chow, S.-C.; Chang, M., Adaptive design in clinical trials, (2007), Chapman & Hall/CRC FL · Zbl 1235.62132 |

[7] | Cohen, A.; Sackrowitz, H.B., Estimating the Mean of the selected population, (), 243-270 |

[8] | Cohen, A.; Sackrowitz, H.B., Two stage conditionally unbiased estimators of the selected Mean, Statist. probab. lett., 8, 3, 273-278, (1989) · Zbl 0677.62020 |

[9] | DeGroot, M.H., Probability and statistics, (1975), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Reading, Massachusetts · Zbl 0349.62001 |

[10] | Kieser, M., Discussion, Biometrical J., 47, 271-273, (2005) |

[11] | Lehmann, E.M., Testing statistical hypotheses, (1959), John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York · Zbl 0089.14102 |

[12] | Sampson, A.R.; Sill, M.W., Drop-the-losers design: normal case, Biom. J., 47, 257-268, (2005) |

[13] | Sill, M.W.; Sampson, A.R., Extension of a two-stage conditionally unbiased estimator of the selected population to the bivariate normal case, Comm. statist. theory methods, 36, 801-813, (2007) · Zbl 1109.62043 |

[14] | Sill, M., 2000. Estimation and Inference for Drop-the-Losers Designs. Ph.D. Dissertation Department of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA |

[15] | Tappin, L., Unbiased estimation of the parameter of a selected binomial population, Comm. statist. theory method, 21, 4, 1067-1083, (1992) · Zbl 0800.62129 |

[16] | Wittes, J., Discussion, Biom. J., 47, 276-277, (2005) |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.