zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Instability wave models for the near-field fluctuations of turbulent jets. (English) Zbl 1241.76203
Summary: Previous work has shown that aspects of the evolution of large-scale structures, particularly in forced and transitional mixing layers and jets, can be described by linear and nonlinear stability theories. However, questions persist as to the choice of the basic (steady) flow field to perturb, and the extent to which disturbances in natural (unforced), initially turbulent jets may be modelled with the theory. For unforced jets, identification is made difficult by the lack of a phase reference that would permit a portion of the signal associated with the instability wave to be isolated from other, uncorrelated fluctuations. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which pressure and velocity fluctuations in subsonic, turbulent round jets can be described as linear perturbations to the mean flow field. The disturbances are expanded about the experimentally measured jet mean flow field, and evolved using linear parabolized stability equations (PSE) that account, in an approximate way, for the weakly non-parallel jet mean flow field. We utilize data from an extensive microphone array that measures pressure fluctuations just outside the jet shear layer to show that, up to an unknown initial disturbance spectrum, the phase, wavelength, and amplitude envelope of convecting wavepackets agree well with PSE solutions at frequencies and azimuthal wavenumbers that can be accurately measured with the array. We next apply the proper orthogonal decomposition to near-field velocity fluctuations measured with particle image velocimetry, and show that the structure of the most energetic modes is also similar to eigenfunctions from the linear theory. Importantly, the amplitudes of the modes inferred from the velocity fluctuations are in reasonable agreement with those identified from the microphone array. The results therefore suggest that, to predict, with reasonable accuracy, the evolution of the largest-scale structures that comprise the most energetic portion of the turbulent spectrum of natural jets, nonlinear effects need only be indirectly accounted for by considering perturbations to the mean turbulent flow field, while neglecting any non-zero frequency disturbance interactions.

76E15 Absolute and convective instability and stability in hydrodynamic stability
76F10 Shear flows and turbulence
Full Text: DOI
[1] DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.061903.175810 · Zbl 1117.76027
[2] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112008005715 · Zbl 1171.76442
[3] Gudmundsson, AIAA Paper (2009)
[4] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112084000124 · Zbl 0543.76109
[5] DOI: 10.1017/S002211207400190X
[6] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112084002299 · Zbl 0548.76052
[7] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112006001613 · Zbl 1104.76023
[8] Bridges, AIAA Paper (2003)
[9] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112085000027
[10] DOI: 10.1063/1.1501545 · Zbl 1185.76262
[11] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112075001966 · Zbl 0312.76051
[12] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112074001534 · Zbl 0284.76034
[13] DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1981.0001 · Zbl 0464.76045
[14] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112085003536 · Zbl 0586.76102
[15] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112056000342 · Zbl 0073.20803
[16] DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7930(99)00013-4 · Zbl 0978.76030
[17] DOI: 10.1016/0022-460X(79)90576-5
[18] Lumley, Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Wave Propagation pp 116– (1967)
[19] DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1952.0060 · Zbl 0049.25905
[20] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112080001760
[21] DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7930(96)00044-8 · Zbl 0886.76029
[22] DOI: 10.2514/2.552
[23] Li, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 8 pp 253– (1996)
[24] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112074001121
[25] DOI: 10.1063/1.2437238 · Zbl 1146.76462
[26] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112082000408
[27] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112083003195
[28] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112008001833 · Zbl 1151.76356
[29] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112070000605
[30] DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(87)90041-6 · Zbl 0619.76089
[31] Huerre, AIAA Paper (1983)
[32] DOI: 10.1016/S0022-460X(85)80102-4
[33] DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.245
[34] DOI: 10.1016/0022-460X(77)90493-X
[35] DOI: 10.1016/S0022-460X(85)80106-1
[36] DOI: 10.1017/S002211208300333X
[37] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112092002453 · Zbl 0754.76029
[38] DOI: 10.1016/j.crme.2005.08.003 · Zbl 1177.76375
[39] DOI: 10.1007/BF00271620 · Zbl 0748.76050
[40] Day, J. Fluid Mech. 446 pp 375– (2001)
[41] DOI: 10.1260/1475-472X.9.4-5.533
[42] Balakumar, AIAA Paper (1998)
[43] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112071001745
[44] DOI: 10.1063/1.3139302 · Zbl 1183.76430
[45] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112097005089
[46] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112076002176 · Zbl 0338.76021
[47] DOI: 10.1260/147547206779379877
[48] Pinier, AIAA Paper (2006)
[49] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112087000624
[50] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112088002939
[51] DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1990.0128 · Zbl 0711.76043
[52] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112077001700
[53] DOI: 10.2514/3.9990
[54] DOI: 10.1115/1.3607624
[55] DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.09.008
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.