zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Correctness, completeness and termination of pattern-based model-to-model transformation. (English) Zbl 1239.68026
Kurz, Alexander (ed.) et al., Algebra and coalgebra in computer science. Third international conference, CALCO 2009, Udine, Italy, September 7–10, 2009. Proceedings. Berlin: Springer (ISBN 978-3-642-03740-5/pbk). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5728, 383-397 (2009).
Summary: Model-to-model (M2M) transformation consists in transforming models from a source to a target language. Many transformation languages exist, but few of them combine a declarative and relational style with a formal underpinning able to show properties of the transformation. Pattern-based transformation is an algebraic, bidirectional, and relational approach to M2M transformation. Specifications are made of patterns stating the allowed or forbidden relations between source and target models, and then compiled into low level operational mechanisms to perform source-to-target or target-to-source transformations. In this paper, we study the compilation into operational triple graph grammar rules and show: (i) correctness of the compilation of a specification without negative patterns; (ii) termination of the rules, and (iii) completeness, in the sense that every model considered relevant can be built by the rules.
For the entire collection see [Zbl 1175.68014].

68N30 Mathematical aspects of software engineering (specification, verification, metrics, requirements, etc.)
68R10 Graph theory (including graph drawing) in computer science
Full Text: DOI
[1] Akehurst, D.H., Kent, S.: A relational approach to defining transformations in a metamodel. In: Jézéquel, J.-M., Hussmann, H., Cook, S. (eds.) UML 2002. LNCS, vol. 2460, pp. 243–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2002) · Zbl 1018.68518 · doi:10.1007/3-540-45800-X_20
[2] Braun, P., Marschall, F.: Transforming object oriented models with BOTL. ENTCS 72(3) (2003)
[3] de Lara, J., Guerra, E.: Pattern-based model-to-model transformation. In: Ehrig, H., Heckel, R., Rozenberg, G., Taentzer, G. (eds.) ICGT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5214, pp. 426–441. Springer, Heidelberg (2008) · Zbl 1175.68114 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87405-8_29
[4] Ehrig, H., Ehrig, K., de Lara, J., Taentzer, G., Varró, D., Varró-Gyapay, S.: Termination criteria for model transformation. In: Cerioli, M. (ed.) FASE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3442, pp. 49–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2005) · Zbl 1119.68344 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31984-9_5
[5] Ehrig, H., Ehrig, K., Ermel, C., Hermann, F., Taentzer, G.: Information preserving bidirectional model transformations. In: Dwyer, M.B., Lopes, A. (eds.) FASE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4422, pp. 72–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) · Zbl 05270464 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71289-3_7
[6] Ehrig, H., Ehrig, K., Prange, U., Taentzer, G.: Fundamentals of algebraic graph transformation. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) · Zbl 1095.68047
[7] Ehrig, H., Ermel, C., Hermann, F.: On the relationship of model transformations based on triple and plain graph grammars. In: Proc. GRAMOT 2008 (2008) · doi:10.1145/1402947.1402950
[8] Ehrig, H., Hermann, F., Sartorius, C.: Completeness and correctness of model transformations based on triple graph grammars with negative application conditions. In: GT-VMT 2009. Electronic Communications of the EASST (to appear, 2009)
[9] Heckel, R., Wagner, A.: Ensuring consistency of conditional graph rewriting - a constructive approach. ENTCS 2 (1995) · Zbl 0910.68154
[10] Königs, A.: Model transformation with triple graph grammars. In: Proc. MTiP 2005 (2005)
[11] Königs, A., Schürr, A.: Tool integration with triple graph grammars - a survey. ENTCS 148(1), 113–150 (2006)
[12] Lack, S., Sobocinski, P.: Adhesive categories. In: Walukiewicz, I. (ed.) FOSSACS 2004. LNCS, vol. 2987, pp. 273–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) · Zbl 1126.68447 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24727-2_20
[13] Lawley, M., Steel, J.: Practical declarative model transformation with Tefkat. In: Bruel, J.-M. (ed.) MoDELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3844, pp. 139–150. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) · doi:10.1007/11663430_15
[14] MOLA. MOdel transformation LAnguage, http://mola.mii.lu.lv/
[15] MTF. Model Transformation Framework , http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/mtf
[16] Orejas, F., Guerra, E., de Lara, J., Ehrig, H.: Correctness, completeness and termination of pattern-based model-to-model transformation (long version). Technical Report 2009/09, TU Berlin, Fak. IV (2009) · Zbl 1239.68026
[17] QVT (2005), http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/05-11-01.pdf
[18] Schürr, A.: Specification of graph translators with triple graph grammars. In: Mayr, E.W., Schmidt, G., Tinhofer, G. (eds.) WG 1994. LNCS, vol. 903, pp. 151–163. Springer, Heidelberg (1995) · doi:10.1007/3-540-59071-4_45
[19] Stevens, P.: Bidirectional model transformations in QVT: Semantic issues and open questions. In: Engels, G., Opdyke, B., Schmidt, D.C., Weil, F. (eds.) MODELS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4735, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) · Zbl 05314755 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75209-7_1
[20] Tratt, L.: A change propagating model transformation language. JOT 7(3), 107–126 (2008) · Zbl 05515535 · doi:10.5381/jot.2008.7.3.a3
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.