×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Relative proportionality for subvarieties of moduli spaces of \(K3\) and abelian surfaces. (English) Zbl 1222.14020
The proportionality theorem of Hirzebruch and Höfer states that if \(Y\) is a Hilbert modular surface or a ball quotient and \(\bar Y=Y\coprod S_{\bar Y}\) is a compactification with \(S_{\bar Y}\) a normal crossings divisor, then if \(\bar S\subset \bar Y\) is a smooth curve and \(S_{\bar C}=\bar C \cap S_{\bar Y}\) (as sets, i.e. the reduced intersection) then \[ \alpha \bar C\bar C+\alpha\deg S_{\bar C} \geq -K_{\bar Y}\bar C +(\alpha-1)S_{\bar Y}\bar C \eqno{(*)} \] where \(\alpha=2\) for Hilbert modular surfaces and \(\alpha=3\) in the ball quotient case. Moreover, if \(\bar Y\) satisfies \(\Omega^1_{\bar Y}(\log S_{\bar Y})\) nef and \(\omega_{\bar Y}(S_{\bar Y})\) ample on \(Y\) – for instance, \(\bar Y\) is a sutable toroidal compactification – then equality in (*) implies that \(C=\bar C\cap Y\) is a subball quotient.
This paper extends these results to Shimura varieties of ball quotient type (i.e. associated with \({{\text{SU}}}(1,n)\)) or \({\text{SO}}(2,n)\) type. The latter include the moduli of polarised \(K3\) and abelian surfaces. In these generalisations, the curve \(C\) is replaced by a submanifold \(Z\subset Y\).
If \(C\) is a Shimura curve and \(Y\) is an arbitrary projetive surface contained in a Shimura variety \(M\) of \({\text{SO}}(2,n)\) type one gets, after compactification, inequalities as in \((*)\) but with the sign reversed: \[ \alpha \bar C\bar C+\alpha\deg S_{\bar C} \leq -K_{\bar Y}\bar C +(\alpha-1)S_{\bar Y}\bar C \eqno{(†)} \] with \(\alpha=2\) if \(\theta_{\bar C}^{(2)}\neq 0\) and \(\alpha=2\) if \(\theta_{\bar Y}^{(2)}= 0\). Here \(\theta^{(2)}\) denotes the Griffiths-Yukawa coupling: there is also the possibility that \(\theta_{\bar C}^{(2)}= 0\) and \(\theta_{\bar Y}^{(2)}\neq 0\), which occurs when \(Y\) is a product of \(C\) and another curve.
These inequalities also generalise to higher dimension. Using them, the authors formulate a condition that forces \(Y\) to be a Shimura variety of Hodge type: in the case above, if there are sufficiently many curves \(C_i\) satisfying \[ \alpha \bar C_i\bar C_i+\alpha\deg S_{\bar C_i} \leq -K_{\bar Y}\bar C_i +(\alpha-1)S_{\bar Y}\bar C_i \eqno{(‡)} \] then \(Y\) is a Hilbert modular surface or ball quotient, according to the value of \(\alpha\).
This is motivated by the observation that the André-Oort conjecture (which holds under GRH) implies that any subvariety with a dense set of CM points must be of Hodge type.
The results in their full generality are too complicated to state here, but can be described quickly. First the proportionality: a Shimura variety \(M\) of \({\text{SO}}(2,n)\) or \({\text{SU}}(1,n)\) type and a dimension \(d\) submanifold \(Z\subset M\), and suitable compactifications, there are inequalities satisfied by the degrees of certain sheaves. For instance, for \({\text{SO}}(2,n)\) type \[ d\deg_{\omega_{\bar Z}}(S_{\bar Z})({\mathcal N}^*_{\bar Z/\bar M})+(n-d)\deg_{\omega_{\bar Z}}(S_{\bar Z})\big(\Omega^1_{\bar Z}(\log S_{\bar Z})\big)\geq 0 \] if \(\theta_{\bar Z}^{(2)}\neq 0\) and \(S_{\bar Z}=\bar Z\setminus Z\) is a normal crossings divisor: equivalently \[ \mu_{\omega_{\bar Z}}(S_{\bar Z})({\mathcal N}^*_{\bar Z/\bar M})\geq \mu_{\omega_{\bar Z}}(S_{\bar Z})\big(T_{\bar Z}(-\log S_{\bar Z})\big). \] If these inequalities are equalities then (for \(d>1\)) \(Z\) is a Shimura variety.
Second, the characterisations of Shimura varieties as having many subvarieties satisfying the above equalities are obtained from \((†)\) and \((‡)\) by replacing \(Y\) by \(Z\) and \(C_i\) by codimension \(1\) subvarieties \(W_i\) of type \({\text{SO}}(2,d-1)\). If there are at least \(\varsigma(\bar Z)\) such \(W_i\) satisfying the slope condition \[ \mu_{\omega_{\bar W_i}}(S_{\bar W_i})({\mathcal N}^*_{\bar W_i/\bar Z})\geq \mu_{\omega_{\bar W_i}}(S_{\bar W_i})\big(T_{\bar W_i}(-\log S_{\bar W_i})\big), \] where \(\varsigma(\bar Z)=\rho(\bar Z)^2+\rho(\bar Z)+1\) (slightly modified if \(d<4\)), then \(Z\) is a Shimura variety of type \({\text{SO}}(2,d)\).
The proofs are mainly Hodge theory. Ingredients include the results of the last two authors on Arakelov-type inequalities and Shimura varieties, in [J. Differ. Geom. 77, No. 2, 291–352 (2007; Zbl 1133.14010)], and the results of Simpson and others on Higgs bundles and local systems. However, there is also a stage that requires some details of toroidal compactification, because one needs to be able to blow up at the boundary in such a way that the embedding of \(W_i\) in the moduli space extends to the closure.

MSC:
14D07 Variation of Hodge structures (algebro-geometric aspects)
14J10 Families, moduli, classification: algebraic theory
14J28 \(K3\) surfaces and Enriques surfaces
14G35 Modular and Shimura varieties
14K10 Algebraic moduli of abelian varieties, classification
14M27 Compactifications; symmetric and spherical varieties
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI arXiv