×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Smeared crack approach: back to the original track. (English) Zbl 1196.74180
Summary: This paper briefly reviews the formulations used over the last 40 years for the solution of problems involving tensile cracking, with both the discrete and the smeared crack approaches. The paper focuses on the smeared approach, identifying as its main drawbacks the observed mesh-size and mesh-bias spurious dependence when the method is applied ’straightly’. A simple isotropic local damage constitutive model is considered, and the (exponential) softening modulus is regularized according to the material fracture energy and the element size. The continuum and discrete mechanical problems corresponding to both the weak discontinuity (smeared cracks) and the strong discontinuity (discrete cracks) approaches are analysed and the question of propagation of the strain localization band (crack) is identified as the main difficulty to be overcome in the numerical procedure. A tracking technique is used to ensure stability of the solution, attaining the necessary convergence properties of the corresponding discrete finite element formulation. Numerical examples show that the formulation derived is stable and remarkably robust. As a consequence, the results obtained do not suffer from spurious mesh-size or mesh-bias dependence, comparing very favourably with those obtained with other fracture and continuum mechanics approaches.

MSC:
74R10 Brittle fracture
74S05 Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics
Software:
GiD
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Cervera, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 28 pp 373– (2003)
[2] Cervera, Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 193 pp 849– (2003)
[3] The stress distribution of Norfolk Dam. Structures and Materials Research. Department of Civil Engineering Series vol. 100 (19). University of California: Berkeley, CA, U.S.A., 1962.
[4] Ngo, ACI Journal 64 pp 152– (1967)
[5] Nilson, ACI Journal 65 pp 757– (1968)
[6] Tong, International Journal of Solids and Structures 9 pp 313– (1973)
[7] . Engineering Fracture Mechanics. Pineridge Press: Swansea, 1983.
[8] Belytschko, Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 45 pp 601– (1999)
[9] Möes, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 46 pp 131– (1999)
[10] Sukumar, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 48 pp 1549– (2000)
[11] Simo, Computational Mechanics 12 pp 49– (1993)
[12] Oliver, Computational Mechanics 17 pp 277– (1995)
[13] Oliver, International Journal of Plasticity 15 pp 319– (1999)
[14] Oliver, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 28 pp 609– (2004)
[15] Oliver, Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 193 pp 2987– (2004)
[16] Oliver, Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 193 pp 3195– (2004)
[17] , , . A comparative study of numerical models for concrete cracking. In Proceedings of European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, ECCOMAS 2004, , , , , (eds). Jyväskylä, Finland, 2004.
[18] Mosler, Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 193 pp 3351– (2004)
[19] Rashid, Nuclear Engineering and Design 7 pp 334– (1968)
[20] Bazant, Material and Structures 16 pp 155– (1983)
[21] Hillerborg, Cement and Concrete Research 6 pp 773– (1976)
[22] de Borst, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 69 pp 95– (2002)
[23] Cervera, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 24 pp 1225– (1995)
[24] Cervera, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 25 pp 987– (1996)
[25] Finchant, Mechanics of Cohesive-Frictional Materials 4 pp 339– (1999)
[26] Aifantis, Journal of Engineering Materials Technology 106 pp 326– (1984)
[27] de Borst, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 35 pp 521– (1992)
[28] Peerlings, Mechanics of Cohesive-Frictional Materials 4 pp 339– (1998)
[29] de Borst, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 52 pp 63– (2001)
[30] Bazant, Journal of Engineering Mechanics 128 pp 1119– (2002)
[31] Oliver, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 28 pp 461– (1989)
[32] . Investigation of crack growth criteria in the context of the extended finite element method. In Proceedings of European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, ECCOMAS 2004, , , , , (eds). Jyväskylä, Finland, 2004.
[33] . On mesh bias of local damage models for concrete. In Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures; Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures, FraMCoS-5, et al. (eds). Vail, Colorado, U.S.A., 2004.
[34] , Agelet de Saracibar C. COMET: COupled MEchanical and Thermal analysis. Data Input Manual, Version 5.0, Technical Report IT-308, www.cimne.upc.es (2002).
[35] GiD: the personal pre and post-processor www.gid.cimne.upc.es (2002).
[36] Mixed mode fracture of concrete: an experimental approach. Ph. D. Thesis, TU Delft, The Netherlands, 1992.
[37] Di Prisco, International Journal of Fracture 103 pp 127– (2000)
[38] . Adaptive simulation of quasibrittle failure. In Computational Modelling of Concrete Structures; Proceedings of EURO-C 2003 Conference, , , (eds). St. Johann im Pongau, Austria. A.A. Balkema Publishers: Rotterdam, 2003.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.