zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Longitudinal distributions of CO concentration and difference with temperature field in a tunnel fire smoke flow. (English) Zbl 1194.80113
Summary: Longitudinal decay profiles of CO concentration and smoke temperature in a tunnel fire smoke flow are theoretical analyzed and compared, with their difference investigated, under different longitudinal ventilation velocities. Experimental data on longitudinal CO distribution achieved from a set of full scale road tunnel fire tests are presented to compare with the theoretical equation. CFD simulations are also carried out by Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS). It is found that the longitudinal profile of CO concentration along the tunnel yields a function of \(C_x/C_0= 1/(1+bx)\), and its difference with that of the smoke temperature increases along the tunnel by a function of \(C_x/C_0- \Delta T_x/\Delta T_0\approx\lambda(1-e^{-Kx})\). The smoke temperature decays much faster than the CO concentration along the tunnel. Their longitudinal profile difference decreases as the longitudinal ventilation velocity increases, and increases along with the distance away from the fire asymptotically to a quasi-steady value. The value of \(b\) decreases as the longitudinal ventilation velocity increases, which indicates that the CO concentration decays relatively slower along the tunnel under a higher longitudinal ventilation velocity. And its value is shown to be less affected by the longitudinal ventilation velocity for a relative larger fire. The increase in the longitudinal ventilation velocity leads to the enhancement of the air mass entrainment, thus results in the decrease of the longitudinal decay profile difference between the CO concentration and the smoke temperature. The value of \(\lambda\) is found to decrease with the increase of the longitudinal ventilation velocity, following a reciprocal function of \(\lambda\sim1/(\phi+\alpha u)\). Its value at zero longitudinal ventilation velocity is higher for a larger fire, but decreases faster with the increase of the longitudinal ventilation velocity than a smaller fire. The full scale experimental data and the CFD simulation results both agree well with the theoretical analysis and equations.

80A25 Combustion
76R10 Free convection
76F65 Direct numerical and large eddy simulation of turbulence
Full Text: DOI
[1] Vuilleumier, F.; Weatherill, A.; Crausaz, B.: Safety aspects of railway and road tunnel: example of the lotschberg railway tunnel and mont-blanc road tunnel, Tunn. undergr. Sp. technol. 17, 153-158 (2002)
[2] W. H. Hong, The progress and controlling situation of Daegu Subway fire disaster, in: Proc. of the 6th Asia – Oceania Symposium on Fire Science and Technology, 17 – 20 March, 2004, Daegu, Korea, pp. 28 – 46.
[3] Leitner, A.: The fire catastrophe in the tauern tunnel: experience and conclusions for the austrian guidelines, Tunn. undergr. Sp. technol. 16, 217-223 (2001)
[4] Alarie, Y.: Toxicity of fire smoke, Crit. rev. Toxicol. 32, 259-289 (2002)
[5] Chow, W. K.; Li, Y. Z.; Cui, E.; Huo, R.: Natural smoke filling in atrium with liquid pool fires up to 1.6MW, Build. environ. 36, No. 1, 121-127 (2001)
[6] He, Y. P.; Fernando, A.; Luo, M. C.: Determination of interface height from measured parameter profile in enclosure fire experiment, Fire safety J. 31, No. 1, 19-38 (1998)
[7] Lee, S. R.; Ryou, H. S.: A numerical study on smoke movement in longitudinal ventilation tunnel fires for different aspect ratio, Build. environ. 41, 719-725 (2006)
[8] Kim, M. P.; Han, Y. S.; Yoon, M. O.: Laser-assisted visualization and measurement of corridor smoke spread, Fire safety J. 31, 239-251 (1998)
[9] Hu, L. H.; Huo, R.; Li, Y. Z.; Wang, H. B.; Chow, W. K.: Full-scale burning tests on studying smoke temperature and velocity along a corridor, Tunn. undergr. Sp. technol. 20, No. 3, 223-229 (2005)
[10] Delichatsios, M. A.: The flow of fire gases under a beamed ceiling. Combust, Flame 43, 1-10 (1981)
[11] L.H. Hu, R. Huo, W.K. Chow, H.B. Wang, R.X. Yang, Decay of buoyant smoke layer temperature along the longitudinal direction in tunnel fires, J. Appl. Fire Sci. 13 (1) (2004 – 2005) 49 – 73.
[12] Hu, L. H.; Huo, R.; Wang, H. B.; Li, Y. Z.; Yang, R. X.: Experimental studies on fire-induced buoyant smoke temperature distribution along tunnel ceiling, Build. environ. 42, No. 11, 3905-3915 (2007)
[13] Ingason, H.: Fire dynamics in tunnels, The handbook of tunnel fire safety, 231-266 (2005)
[14] Gottuk, D. T.; Roby, R. J.; Beyler, C. L.: The role of temperature on carbon monoxide production in compartment fires, Fire safety J. 24, No. 4, 315-331 (1995)
[15] Kunsch, J. P.: Critical velocity and range of a fire – gas plume in a ventilated tunnel, Atmos. environ. 33, 13-24 (1999)
[16] L.H. Hu, R. Huo, R.X. Yang, W.H. He, H.B. Wang, Y.Z. Li, Full scale experiments on studying smoke spread in a road tunnel, in: Fire Safety Science – Proceedings of The Eighth International Symposium, Sep., 2005, Beijing, China, pp. 1437 – 1448.
[17] Hu, L. H.; Huo, R.; Chow, W. K.: Studies on buoyancy-driven back-layering in tunnel fires, Exp. therm fluid sci. 32, 1468-1483 (2008)
[18] Hu, L. H.; Huo, R.; Peng, W.; Chow, W. K.; Yang, R. X.: On the maximum smoke temperature under ceiling in tunnel fires, Tunn. undergr. Sp. technol. 21, No. 6, 650-655 (2006)
[19] Hu, L. H.; Huo, R.; Wang, H. B.; Yang, R. X.: Experimental and numerical studies on longitudinal smoke temperature distribution upstream and downstream from the fire in a road tunnel, J. fire sci. 25, No. 1, 23-43 (2007)
[20] K.B. McGrattan, G.P. Forney, Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 4.07) – User’s Guide. NIST Special Publication 1019, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2006.
[21] K.B. McGrattan, Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 4.07) – Technical Reference Guide. NIST Special Publication 1018, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2006.
[22] P.A. Friday, F.W. Mowrer, Comparison of FDS Model Predictions with FM/SNL Fire Test Data. NISTGCR01-810, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2001.
[23] http://fire.nist.gov/fds/.
[24] Ryder, N. L.; Sutula, J. A.; Schemel, C. F.; Hamer, A. J.; Brunt, V. V.: Consequence modeling using the fire dynamics simulator, J. hazard. Mater. 115, 149-154 (2004)
[25] Ryder, N. L.; Schemel, C. F.; Jankiewicz, S. P.: Near and far field contamination modeling in a large scale enclosure: fire dynamics simulator comparisons with measured observations, J. hazard. Mater. 130, 182-186 (2006)
[26] Hu, L. H.; Fong, N. K.; Yang, L. Z.; Chow, W. K.; Li, Y. Z.; Huo, R.: Modeling fire-induced smoke spread and carbon monoxide transportation in a long channel: fire dynamics simulator comparisons with measured data, J. hazard. Mater. 140, 293-298 (2007)
[27] Cheng, Y. P.; John, R.: Experimental research of motorcar fire, J. China univ. Mining technol. 31, No. 6, 557-560 (2002)
[28] Chow, W. K.; Jojo, S. M.: Numerical studies on performance evaluation of tunnel ventilation safety systems, Tunn. undergr. Sp. technol. 18, 435-452 (2003)
[29] K.B. McGrattan, Anthony Hamins, Numerical Simulation of the Howard Street Tunnel Fire, Baltimore, Maryland, July 2001. NISTIR 6902, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2002.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.