Balanced and unbalanced routes to dissipation in an equilibrated Eady flow. (English) Zbl 1193.76065

Summary: The oceanic general circulation is forced at large scales and is unstable to mesoscale eddies. Large-scale currents and eddy flows are approximately in geostrophic balance. Geostrophic dynamics is characterized by an inverse energy cascade except for dissipation near the boundaries. In this paper, we confront the dilemma of how the general circulation may achieve dynamical equilibrium in the presence of continuous large-scale forcing and the absence of boundary dissipation. We do this with a forced horizontal flow with spatially uniform rotation, vertical stratification and vertical shear in a horizontally periodic domain, i.e. a version of Eady’s flow carried to turbulent equilibrium. A direct route to interior dissipation is presented that is essentially non-geostrophic in its dynamics, with significant submesoscale frontogenesis, frontal instability and breakdown, and forward kinetic energy cascade to dissipation. To support this conclusion, a series of simulations is made with both quasigeostrophic and Boussinesq models. The quasigeostrophic model is shown as increasingly inefficient in achieving equilibration through viscous dissipation at increasingly higher numerical resolution (hence Reynolds number), whereas the non-geostrophic Boussinesq model equilibrates with only weak dependence on resolution and Rossby number.


76F25 Turbulent transport, mixing
86A05 Hydrology, hydrography, oceanography
Full Text: DOI


[1] DOI: 10.1017/S002211209500125X · Zbl 0858.76095
[2] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5270
[3] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<0568:COCRBC>2.0.CO;2
[4] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112009992643 · Zbl 1189.76161
[5] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1999)029<0475:SOACCE>2.0.CO;2
[6] McWilliams, Nonlinear Processes in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics pp 287– (2003)
[7] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<1773:AUVMST>2.0.CO;2
[8] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029<0011:AFMMFA>2.0.CO;2
[9] DOI: 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1955.tb01148.x
[10] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112095000012 · Zbl 0832.76012
[11] Lindborg, Geophys. Res. Lett. 19 pp 59– (2005)
[12] DOI: 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1949.tb01265.x
[13] DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(79)90034-3 · Zbl 0423.76070
[14] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<1087:GT>2.0.CO;2
[15] DOI: 10.1175/2008JPO3810.1
[16] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1982)039<0707:CMOFDB>2.0.CO;2
[17] DOI: 10.1175/2007JPO3672.1
[18] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112008001110 · Zbl 1151.76616
[19] DOI: 10.1175/JPO3101.1
[20] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035<0774:UPVFPI>2.0.CO;2
[21] DOI: 10.1175/2008JAS2653.1
[22] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1970)027<0721:ONGBSP>2.0.CO;2
[23] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1966)023<0390:ONGBS>2.0.CO;2
[24] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1541:QMASBO>2.0.CO;2
[25] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112082002250 · Zbl 0497.76032
[26] Press, Numerical Recipes (1986)
[27] Pedlosky, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (1987)
[28] Muller, Marine Turbulence: Theories, Observations and Models pp 397– (2005)
[29] DOI: 10.1175/JPO2770.1
[30] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112006002060 · Zbl 1177.76147
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.