zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

The free ample monoid. (English) Zbl 1192.20041
A semigroup \(S\) is ‘ample’ if it is both left and right ample (also termed, respectively, left type A and right type A). While variations of these definitions have a long history, the left ample property itself is especially well motivated, being the abstract characterization of the submonoids of symmetric inverse semigroups that are closed under the unary operation \(\alpha\to\alpha^+=\alpha\alpha^{-1}\). They may naturally be regarded as semigroups with an additional unary operation \(a\to a^+\); thus ample semigroups may be regarded as semigroups with two additional unary operations, \(a\to a^+\) and \(a\to a^*\).
The free left ample semigroups were first constructed by the first author [Glasg. Math. J. 33, No. 2, 135-148 (1991; Zbl 0737.20032)] and, perhaps unsurprisingly, are embeddable in the corresponding free inverse semigroups. Since ample semigroups are not, in general, \((^+,^*)\)-embeddable in inverse semigroups, the main theorem of the paper under review is less unsurprising. Let \(FI_X\) and \(FG_X\) denote the free inverse semigroup and free group, respectively, on a set \(X\). Then within \(FI_X\), the free ample semigroup on \(X\) can be recognized as the complete pre-image of the free monoid on \(X\), under the homomorphism \(FI_X\to FG_X\).
The authors provide two proofs of this fact, the second being based on certain semidirect products of monoids and semilattices, induced by double actions. They also observe that the free ample semigroup is in fact weakly ample, moreover even weakly \(E\)-ample. While the distinctions are too subtle to go into here, it should be noted that the class of weakly \(E\)-ample semigroups, which have also gone under the name of ‘restriction’ semigroups (among other names), have a substantial history of their own and the description of their free members is therefore a notable achievement.

20M05 Free semigroups, generators and relations, word problems
20M10 General structure theory for semigroups
Full Text: DOI
[1] DOI: 10.1007/BF02572784 · Zbl 0453.20051
[2] DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-8130-3
[3] DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3975(00)00382-0 · Zbl 0988.18003
[4] Evans T., J. London Math. Soc. 44 pp 551–
[5] DOI: 10.1093/qmath/28.3.285 · Zbl 0377.20051
[6] DOI: 10.1007/BFb0083424
[7] DOI: 10.1017/S0017089500008168 · Zbl 0737.20032
[8] DOI: 10.1112/S0025579300012973 · Zbl 0721.20037
[9] DOI: 10.1017/S0013091504000070 · Zbl 1107.20050
[10] DOI: 10.1080/00927879908826450 · Zbl 0926.20039
[11] DOI: 10.1142/S0218196799000412 · Zbl 0948.20036
[12] DOI: 10.1080/00927870008841083 · Zbl 0965.20034
[13] DOI: 10.1007/s002330010144 · Zbl 1031.20051
[14] DOI: 10.1142/S0218196796000404 · Zbl 0866.20048
[15] DOI: 10.1142/S0218196705002451 · Zbl 1087.20040
[16] Howie J. M., Fundamentals of Semigroup Theory (1995)
[17] DOI: 10.1007/s002330010032 · Zbl 0982.20051
[18] DOI: 10.1093/qmath/37.3.279 · Zbl 0605.20057
[19] DOI: 10.1142/9789812816689
[20] DOI: 10.1007/s00233-005-0558-1 · Zbl 1097.20044
[21] McKenzie R. N., Algebras, Lattices and Varieties (1987)
[22] Munn W. D., Proc. London Math. Soc. 29 pp 385–
[23] DOI: 10.1016/0021-8693(76)90023-5 · Zbl 0343.20037
[24] DOI: 10.1007/BF02570809 · Zbl 0259.20054
[25] DOI: 10.1017/S0017089500002731 · Zbl 0328.20048
[26] Schein B. M., Izv. Vysš. Učebn. Zaved. Matematika 4 pp 91–
[27] DOI: 10.1007/BF02573019 · Zbl 0197.29404
[28] DOI: 10.1007/BF01351670 · Zbl 0163.01403
[29] Trokhimenko V. S., Izv. Vysš. Učebn. Zaved. Matematika 11 pp 71–
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.