×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Leader-follower cooperative attitude control of multiple rigid bodies. (English) Zbl 1161.93002
Summary: We extend our previous results on coordinated control of rotating rigid bodies to the case of teams with heterogeneous agents. We assume that only a certain subgroup of the agents (the leaders) is vested with the main control objective, that is, maintain constant relative orientation amongst themselves. The other members of the team must meet relaxed control specifications, namely, maintain their respective orientations within certain bounds, dictated by the orientation of the leaders. The proposed control laws respect the limited information each rigid body has with respect to the rest of its peers (leaders or followers), as well as with the rest of the team. Each rigid body is equipped with a feedback control law that utilizes the Laplacian matrix of the associated communication graph, and which encodes the limited communication capabilities between the team members. Similarly to the single integrator case, the convergence of the system relies on the connectivity of the communication graph.

MSC:
93A14 Decentralized systems
70Q05 Control of mechanical systems
93C95 Application models in control theory
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Olfati-Saber, R.; Murray, R.M., Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays, IEEE transactions on automatic control, 49, 9, 1520-1533, (2004) · Zbl 1365.93301
[2] Cortes, J.; Martinez, S.; Bullo, F., Robust rendezvous for mobile autonomous agents via proximity graphs in arbitrary dimensions, IEEE transactions on automatic control, 51, 8, 1289-1298, (2006) · Zbl 1366.93400
[3] Jadbabaie, A.; Lin, J.; Morse, A.S., Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules, IEEE transactions on automatic control, 48, 6, 988-1001, (2003) · Zbl 1364.93514
[4] Ren, W.; Beard, R., Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies, IEEE transactions on automatic control, 50, 5, 655-661, (2005) · Zbl 1365.93302
[5] H.G. Tanner, A. Jadbabaie, G.J. Pappas, Stable flocking of mobile agents, in: 42st IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, Maui, HW, 2003, pp. 2010-2015
[6] Olfati-Saber, R., Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: algorithms and theory, IEEE transactions on automatic control, 51, 3, 401-420, (2006) · Zbl 1366.93391
[7] Lafferriere, G.; Williams, A.; Caughman, J.; Veerman, J.J.P., Decentralized control of vehicle formations, Systems and control letters, 54, 9, 899-910, (2005) · Zbl 1129.93303
[8] W. Ren, R.W. Beard, E.M. Atkins, A survey of consensus problems in multi-agent coordination, in: American Control Conference, Portland, OR, 2005, pp. 1859-1864
[9] Godsil, C.; Royle, G., ()
[10] Tsiotras, P., Further passivity results for the attitude control problem, IEEE transactions on automatic control, 43, 11, 1597-1600, (1998) · Zbl 0989.93081
[11] D.V. Dimarogonas, P. Tsiotras, K. Kyriakopoulos, Laplacian cooperative attitude control of multiple rigid bodies, in: 2006 CCA/CACSD/ISIC, M√ľnich, Germany, October 4-6, 2006 · Zbl 1161.93002
[12] D.V. Dimarogonas, P. Tsiotras, K. Kyriakopoulos, Leader-follower cooperative attitude control of multiple rigid bodies, in: 2008 American Control Conference, 2008, pp. 801-806 · Zbl 1161.93002
[13] Lawton, J.R.; Beard, R., Synchronized multiple spacecraft rotations, Automatica, 38, 8, 1359-1364, (2002) · Zbl 1032.93553
[14] Wang, P.K.C.; Hadaegh, F.Y.; Lau, K., Synchronized formation rotation and attitude control of multiple free-flying spacecraft, Journal of guidance, control and dynamics, 22, 1, 28-35, (1999)
[15] Mesbahi, M.; Hadaegh, F.Y., Formation flying control of multiple spacecraft via graphs, matrix inequalities, and switching, Journal of guidance, control and dynamics, 24, 2, 369-377, (2001)
[16] S. Nair, N.E. Leonard, Stabilization of a coordinated network of rotating rigid bodies, in: 43rd IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, Paradise Island, Bahamas, 2004, pp. 4690-4695
[17] Shuster, M.D., A survey of attitude representations, Journal of astronautical sciences, 41, 4, 493-517, (1993)
[18] P. Tsiotras, New control laws for the attitude stabilization of rigid bodies, in: 13th IFAC Symposium on Automatic Control in Aerospace, Palo Alto, CA, Sept. 14-17, 1994, pp. 316-321
[19] Tsiotras, P., Stabilization and optimality results for the attitude control problem, Journal of guidance, control and dynamics, 19, 4, 772-779, (1996) · Zbl 0854.93104
[20] Tsiotras, P.; Junkins, J.L.; Schaub, H., Higher order Cayley-transforms with applications to attitude representations, Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics, 20, 3, 528-534, (1997) · Zbl 0885.93010
[21] Ferrari-Trecate, G.; Egerstedt, M.; Buffa, A.; Ji, M., Laplacian sheep: A hybrid, stop-go policy for leader-based containment control, (), 212-226 · Zbl 1178.68595
[22] W. Ren, Distributed attitude alignment among multiple networked spacecraft, in: American Control Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 2006, pp. 1760-1765
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.