zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Operating charts for continuous sedimentation. IV: Limitations for control of dynamic behaviour. (English) Zbl 1154.76047
Summary: The nonlinear behaviour of a one-dimensional idealized model of continuous sedimentation has been investigated in this series of papers [for parts I, II, III see the author, ibid. 41, No. 2–3, 117–144 (2001; Zbl 1128.76370); 53, No. 2, 139–185 (2005; Zbl 1086.76069); 54, No. 3, 225–259 (2006; Zbl 1189.76667), respectively]. The model is a scalar hyperbolic conservation law with a space-discontinuous flux function and a point source. Parameters in the equation are two input variables (concentration and flux) and the control variable (a volume flow). The most desired type of solution contains a large concentration discontinuity and is referred to as ‘optimal operation’. Operating charts (concentration-flux diagrams) have proved to be a means for classifying the nonlinear behaviour. In this paper, some fundamental results on the dynamic behaviour are presented, which give information on the limitations of the range of the control variable. When this is used together with the previously introduced optimal control strategies for step inputs, the process can be controlled.

76N25 Flow control and optimization for compressible fluids and gas dynamics
76T20 Suspensions
Full Text: DOI
[1] Diehl S (2001). Operating charts for continuous sedimentation I: control of steady states. J Eng Math 41: 117–144 · Zbl 1128.76370
[2] Diehl S (2005). Operating charts for continuous sedimentation II: step responses. J Eng Math 53: 139–185 · Zbl 1086.76069
[3] Diehl S (2006). Operating charts for continuous sedimentation III: control of step inputs. J Eng Math 54: 225–259 · Zbl 1189.76667
[4] Diehl S (1995). On scalar conservation laws with point source and discontinuous flux function. SIAM J Math Anal 26(6): 1425–1451 · Zbl 0852.35094
[5] Diehl S (1996). A conservation law with point source and discontinuous flux function modelling continuous sedimentation. SIAM J Appl Math 56(2): 388–419 · Zbl 0849.35142
[6] Bürger R, Karlsen KH, Klingenberg C and Risebro NH (2003). A front tracking approach to a model of continuous sedimentation in ideal clarifier-thickener units. Nonl Anal Real World Appl 4: 457–481 · Zbl 1013.35052
[7] Bürger R, Karlsen KH, Risebro NH and Towers JD (2004). Well-posedness in BV t and convergence of a difference scheme for continuous sedimentation in ideal clarifier-thickener units. Numer Math 97: 25–65 · Zbl 1053.76047
[8] Karlsen KH and Towers JD (2004). Convergence of the Lax-Friedrichs scheme and stability for conservation laws with a discontinuous space-time dependent flux. Chinese Ann Math Ser B 25(3): 287–318 · Zbl 1112.65085
[9] Kynch GJ (1952). A theory of sedimentation. Trans Faraday Soc 48: 166–176
[10] Keinath TM, Ryckman M, Dana C and Hofer D (1977). Activated sludge–unified system design and operation. J Envir Eng Div ASCE 103(EE5): 829–849
[11] Laquidara VD and Keinath TM (1983). Mechanism of clarification failure. J Water Pollut Control Fed 55(1): 54–57
[12] Keinath TM (1985). Operational dynamics and control of secondary clarifiers. J Water Pollut Control Fed 57(7): 770–776
[13] Bürger R, Karlsen KH and Towers JD (2005). A model of continuous sedimentation of flocculated suspensions in clarifier-thickener units. SIAM J Appl Math 65: 882–940 · Zbl 1089.76061
[14] Karlsen KH, Risebro NH and Towers JD (2002). Upwind difference approximations for degenerate parabolic convection-diffusion equations with a discontinuous coefficient. IMA J Numer Anal 22: 623–664 · Zbl 1014.65073
[15] Karlsen KH, Risebro NH and Towers JD (2003). L 1 stability for entropy solutions of nonlinear degenerate parabolic convection- diffusion equations with discontinuous coefficients. Skr K Nor Vidensk Selsk 3: 49 pp · Zbl 1036.35104
[16] Stehfest H (1984). An operational dynamic model of the final clarifier. Trans Inst Meas Control 6(3): 160–164
[17] Diehl S, Sparr G and Olsson G (1990). Analytical and numerical description of the settling process in the activated sludge operation. In: Briggs, R (eds) Instrumentation, control and automation of water and wastewater treatment and transport systems, pp 471–478. Pergamon Press, IAWPRC
[18] Bustos MC, Paiva F and Wendland W (1990). Control of continuous sedimentation as an initial and boundary value problem. Math Methods Appl Sci 12: 533–548 · Zbl 0717.35052
[19] Barton NG, Li C-H and Spencer J (1992). Control of a surface of discontinuity in continuous thickeners. J Austral Math Soc Ser B 33: 269–289 · Zbl 0758.35009
[20] Chancelier J-Ph, Cohen de Lara M and Pacard F (1994). Analysis of a conservation PDE with discontinuous flux: a model of settler. SIAM J Appl Math 54(4): 954–995 · Zbl 0811.35077
[21] Chancelier J-Ph, Cohen de Lara M, Joannis C and Pacard F (1997). New insight in dynamic modelling of a secondary settler–II. Dynamical analysis. Water Res 31(8): 1857–1866
[22] Diehl S (1997). Dynamic and steady-state behaviour of continuous sedimentation. SIAM J Appl Math 57(4): 991–1018 · Zbl 0889.35062
[23] Attir U and Denn MM (1978). Dynamics and control of the activated sludge wastewater process. AIChE J 24: 693–698
[24] Thompson D, Chapmand DT and Murphy KL (1989). Step feed control to minimize solids loss during storm flows. Res J Water Pollut Control Fed 61(11–12): 1658–1665
[25] Johnston RRM and Simic K (1991). Improving thickener operation and control by means of a validated model. Minerals Eng 4: 695–705
[26] Couillard D and Zhu S (1992). Control strategy for the activated sludge process under shock loading. Water Res 26: 649–655
[27] Kabouris JC, Georgakakos AP and Camara A (1992). Optimal control of the activated sludge process: effect of sludge storage. Water Res 26: 507–517
[28] Balslev P, Nickelsen C and Lynggaard-Jensen A (1994). On-line flux-theory based control of secondary clarifiers. Water Sci Technol 30(2): 209–218
[29] Grijspeerdt K and Verstraete W (1996). A sensor for the secondary clarifier based on image analysis. Water Sci Technol 33(1): 61–70
[30] Bergh S-G and Olsson G (1996). Knowledge based diagnosis of solids-liquid separation problems. Water Sci Technol 33: 219–226
[31] Kim Y and Pipes WO (1996). Solids routing in an activated sludge process during hydraulic overloads. Water Sci Technol 34(3–4): 9–16
[32] Nyberg U, Andersson B and Aspegren H (1996). Real time control for minimizing effluent concentrations during storm water events. Water Sci Technol 34: 127–134
[33] Sidrak YL (1997). Control of the thickener operation in alumina production. Control Eng Practice 5: 1417–1426
[34] Kim Y, Pipes WO and Chung P-G (1998). Control of activated sludge bulking by operating clarifiers in a series. Water Sci Technol 38(8–9): 1–8
[35] Dauphin S, Joannis C, Deguin A, Bridoux G, Ruban G and Aumond M (1998). Influent flow control to increase the pollution load treated during rainy periods. Water Sci Technol 37(12): 131–139
[36] Georgieva PG and FeyoDe Azevedo S. (1999). Robust control design of an activated sludge process. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 9: 949–967 · Zbl 0939.93520
[37] Schoenbrunn F, Toronto T (1999) Advanced thickener control. In: Advanced process control applications for industry workshop. IEEE Industry Applications Society, pp 83–86
[38] Vanderhasselt A, De Clercq B, Vanderhaegen B, Vanrolleghem P and Verstraete W (1999). On-line control of polymer addition to prevent massive sludge washout. J Env Eng 125: 1014–1021
[39] Charef A, Ghauch A and Martin-Bouyer M (2000). An adaptive and predictive control strategy for an activated sludge process. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 23: 529–534
[40] Georgieva P and Ilchmann A (2001). Adaptive lambda-tracking control of activated sludge processes. Int J Control 12: 1247–1259 · Zbl 1027.93028
[41] Ito H A dissipative approach to control of biological wastewater treatment plants based on entire nonlinear process models. In: Proceedings of the 2004 American control conference, vol 6. IEEE (2004) pp 5489–5495
[42] Olsson G, Nielsen MK, Yuan Z, Lynggaard-Jensen A, Steyer J-P Instrumentation, control and automation in wastewater systems. Intl Water Assn (2005)
[43] Jeppsson U, Rosen C, Alex J, Copp J, Gernaey KV, Pons M-N and Vanrolleghem PA (2006). Towards a benchmark simulation model for plant-wide control strategy performance evaluation of WWTPs.. Water Sci Technol 53: 287–295
[44] Attir U, Denn MM and Petty CA (1977). Dynamic simulation of continuous sedimentation. AIChE Symp Ser No 167 73: 49–54
[45] Lumley DJ, Balmér P and Adamsson J (1988). Investigations of secondary settling at a large treatment plant. Water Sci Technol 20: 133–142
[46] Koehne M, Hoen K and Schuhen M (1995). Modelling and simulation of final clarifiers in wastewater treatment plants. Math Comput Simul 39(5–6): 609–616 · Zbl 05475303
[47] Göhle F, Finnson B and Hultman B (1996). Dynamic simulation of sludge blanket movements in a full-scale rectangular sedimentation basin. Water Sci Technol 33(1): 89–99
[48] Charmot-Charbonnel M-L, Ripoche G, Roche N and Prost C (1999). Modeling and simulation of activated sludge process with cyclic feeding for treatment of highly loaded wastewater. Chem Eng Tech 22: 50–56
[49] Manning WT, Garrett MT and Malina JF (1999). Sludge blanket response to storm surge in an activated-sludge clarifier. Water Environ Res 71: 432–442
[50] Wilén B-M, Lumley D and Nordqvist A (2004). Dynamics in maximal settling capacity in an activated sludge treatment plant with highly loaded secondary settlers. Water Sci Technol 50: 187–194
[51] De Clercq J, Devisscher M, Boonen I, Defrancq J and Vanrolleghem PA (2005). Analysis and simulation of the sludge profile dynamics in a full-scale clarifier. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 80: 523–530
[52] Wilén B-M, Lumley D, Mattsson A and Mino T (2006). Rain events and their effect on effluent quality studied at a full scale activated sludge treatment plant. Water Sci Technol 54: 201–208
[53] Diehl S, A regulator for continuous sedimentation in ideal clarifier-thickener units. Accepted for publication J Eng Math (2007) · Zbl 1133.76045
[54] Diehl S and Jeppsson U (1998). A model of the settler coupled to the biological reactor. Water Res 32(2): 331–342
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.