×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Measuring endogenous supply chain volatility: Beyond the bullwhip effect. (English) Zbl 1147.90308
Summary: Most recent research on supply chain volatility has focused on one particular dimension of that volatility, namely the amplification of upstream order variability. While not ignoring this aspect of supply chain volatility, we focus on a different but equally critical aspect of volatility: the cyclical oscillation of on-hand and on-order inventories about their target values. We prove that such cyclicality does not require oscillatory or random retailer demand as a prerequisite; the resulting volatility is therefore endogenous rather than simply an amplification of exogenous demand inputs. We also measure the amount of amplification resulting from a step increase in demand. The order amplification is the product of two factors, each of which is clearly linked to either on-hand or on-order inventory. Our results attest that supply chain volatility can arise in the absence of exogenous oscillatory or random demand and suggest strategies for avoiding or minimizing such volatility.

MSC:
90B06 Transportation, logistics and supply chain management
90B15 Stochastic network models in operations research
Software:
DYNAMO
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Alwan, L.; Liu, J.; Yao, D., Stochastic characterization of upstream demand processes in a supply chain, IIE transactions, 35, 207-219, (2003)
[2] Anderson, E.G.; Fine, C.H.; Parker, G.G., Upstream volatility in the supply chain: the machine tool industry as a case study, Production and operations management, 9, 3, 239-261, (2000)
[3] Angerhofer, B.J., Angelides, M.C., 2000. System dynamics modeling in supply chain management: Research review. In: Proceeding of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 342-351.
[4] Balakrishnan, A.; Guenes, J.; Pangburn, M., Coordinating supply chains by controlling upstream variability propagation, Manufacturing and service operations management, 6, 2, 163-183, (2004)
[5] Cachon, G., Managing supply chain variability with scheduled ordering policies, Management science, 45, 6, 843-856, (1999) · Zbl 1231.90011
[6] Chen, F.; Drezner, Z.; Ryan, J.; Simchi-Levi, D., Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: the impact of forecasting, lead times, and information, Management science, 46, 3, 436-443, (2000) · Zbl 1231.90019
[7] Chen, F.; Ryan, J.; Simchi-Levi, D., The impact of exponential smoothing forecasts on the bullwhip effect, Naval research logistics quarterly, 47, 4, 269-286, (2000) · Zbl 0968.90006
[8] Chen, F.; Samroengraja, R., Order volatility and supply chain costs, Operations research, 52, 5, 707-722, (2004) · Zbl 1165.90307
[9] Chatfield, D.; Kim, J.; Harrison, T.; Hayya, J., The bullwhip effect-impact of stochastic lead time, information quality, and information sharing: A simulation study, Production and operations management, 13, 4, 340-353, (2004)
[10] Chiang, A.C., Fundamental methods of mathematical economics, (1984), McGraw-Hill
[11] Croson, R.; Donahue, K., Impact of POS data sharing on supply chain management: an experimental study, Production and operations management, 12, 1, 1-11, (2003)
[12] Croson, R.; Donahue, K., Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information, Management science, 52, 3, 323-336, (2006) · Zbl 1232.90037
[13] Daganzo, C.F., On the stability of supply chains, Operations research, 52, 6, 909-921, (2004) · Zbl 1165.90346
[14] Dejonckheere, J.; Disney, S.M.; Lambrecht, M.; Towill, D.R., Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic perspective, European journal of operational research, 147, 567-590, (2003) · Zbl 1026.90030
[15] Dejonckheere, J.; Disney, S.M.; Lambrecht, M.; Towill, D.R., The impact of information enrichment on the bullwhip effect in supply chains: A control engineering perspective, European journal of operational research, 153, 727-750, (2004) · Zbl 1099.90503
[16] Disney, S.M.; Farasyn, I.; Lambrecht, M.; Towill, D.R.; Van de Velde, W., Taming the bullwhip effect whilst watching customer service in a single supply chain echelon, European journal of operational research, 173, 151-172, (2006) · Zbl 1125.90312
[17] Forrester, J., Industrial dynamics: A major breakthrough for decision makers, Harvard business review, 36, 4, 37-66, (1958)
[18] Forrester, J., Industrial dynamics, (1961), MIT Press
[19] Hayya, J.; Kim, J.; Disney, S.; Harrison, T.; Chatfield, D., Estimation in supply chain inventory management, International journal of production research, 44, 7, 1313-1330, (2006) · Zbl 1095.90054
[20] Hosada, T.; Disney, S., On variance amplification in a three-echelon supply chain with minimum Mean square error forecasting, Omega, 34, 344-358, (2006)
[21] Kahn, J.A., Inventories and the volatility of production, The American economic review, 77, 4, 667-679, (1987)
[22] Kim, J.; Chatfield, D.; Harrison, D.; Hayya, J., Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a supply chain with stochastic lead time, European journal of operational research, 173, 617-636, (2006) · Zbl 1125.90363
[23] Lee, H.; Padmanabhan, V.; Whang, S., Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect, Management science, 43, 4, 546-558, (1997) · Zbl 0888.90047
[24] Metters, R., Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains, Journal of operations management, 15, 2, 89-100, (1997)
[25] Miyaoka, J.; Hausman, W., How a base stock policy using stale forecasts provides supply chain benefits, Manufacturing and service operations management, 6, 2, 149-162, (2004)
[26] Steckel, J.; Gupta, S.; Banerji, A., Supply chain decision making: will shorter cycle times and shared point-of-Sale information necessarily help?, Management science, 50, 4, 458-464, (2004) · Zbl 1232.90095
[27] Sterman, J., Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making environment, Management science, 35, 3, 321-339, (1989)
[28] Sterman, J., Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world, (2000), Irwin McGraw-Hill
[29] Warburton, R.D., An analytical investigation of the bullwhip effect, Production and operations management, 13, 2, 150-160, (2004)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.