×

Assessing the cost of capital for longevity risk. (English) Zbl 1141.91540

Summary: The cost of capital is a key element of the embedded value methodology for the valuation of a life business. Further, under some solvency approaches (in particular, the Swiss Solvency Test and the developing Solvency 2 project) assessing the cost of capital constitutes a step in determining the required capital allocation.
Whilst the cost of capital is usually meant as a reward for the risks encumbering a given life portfolio, in actuarial practice the relevant parameter has been traditionally chosen, at least to some extent, inconsistently with such risks. The adoption of market-consistent valuations has then been advocated to reach a common standard.
A market-consistent value usually acknowledges a reward to shareholders’ capital as long as the market does, namely if the risk is systematic or undiversifiable. When dealing with a life annuity portfolio (or a pension plan), an important example of systematic risk is provided by the longevity risk, i.e. the risk of systematic deviations from the forecasted mortality trend. Hence, a market-consistent approach should provide appropriate valuation tools.
In this paper we refer to a portfolio of immediate life annuities and we focus on longevity risk. Our purpose is to design a framework for a valuation of the portfolio which is market-consistent, and therefore based on a risk-neutral argument, while involving some of the basic items of a traditional valuation, viz best estimate future flows and allocated capital. This way, we try to reconcile the traditional with a market-consistent (or risk-neutral) approach. This allows us, in particular, to translate the results obtained under the risk-neutral approach in terms of a properly redefined embedded value.

MSC:

91B30 Risk theory, insurance (MSC2010)
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Biffis, E., Affine processes for dynamic mortality and actuarial valuations, Insurance: mathematics & economics, 37, 443-468, (2005) · Zbl 1129.91024
[2] Biffis, E.; Millossovich, P., A bidimensional approach to mortality risk, Decisions in economics and finance, 29, 71-94, (2006) · Zbl 1160.91366
[3] Blake, D.; Cairns, A.J.G.; Dowd, K., Living with mortality: longevity bonds and other mortality-linked securities, British actuarial journal, 12, 153-228, (2006)
[4] Blake, D.; Cairns, A.J.G.; Dowd, K.; MacMinn, R., Longevity bonds: financial engineering, valuation, and hedging, The journal of risk and insurance, 73, 647-672, (2006)
[5] Brouhns, N.; Denuit, M.; Vermunt, J.K., A Poisson log-bilinear regression approach to the construction of projected life tables, Insurance: mathematics & economics, 31, 373-393, (2002) · Zbl 1074.62524
[6] Burrows, R.P., Lang, J., 1997. Risk discount rates for actuarial appraisal values of life insurance companies. In: Proceedings of the 7th Internation AFIR Colloquium. Cairns, Australia, pp. 283-307
[7] Burrows, R.P.; Whitehead, G.H., The determination of life office appraisal values, Journal of the institute of actuaries, 114, 411-465, (1987)
[8] Cairns, A.J.G.; Blake, D.; Dowd, K., A two-factor model for stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty: theory and calibration, Journal of risk and insurance, 73, 687-718, (2006)
[9] CEIOPS, 2007. QIS3 Technical Specifications
[10] CFO Forum, European embedded value principles and basis for conclusions, (2004)
[11] CFO Forum, 2006. Elaborated principles for an IFRS phase II insurance accounting model. Elaborated principles and basis for conclusions
[12] CMI, 2002. Working paper 1 — An interim basis for adjusting the 92 Series mortality projections for cohort effects. The Faculty of Actuaries and Institute of Actuaries
[13] CMI, 2006. Working paper 20 — Stochastic projection methodologies: Further progress and P-spline model features, example results and implications. The Faculty of Actuaries and Institute of Actuaries
[14] Coleman, A.M., Edwards, B.A., Torrance, D.M., 1992. Maintainable earnings and actuarial methods for valuing life insurance companies. The Institute of Actuaries of Australia, Sessional Meeting 1992
[15] LAVMWP (Life Assurance Value Measurement Working Party), Summary and comparison of approaches used to measure life office values, (2001), The Staple Inn Actuarial Society London
[16] Lee, R.D., The lee – carter method for forecasting mortality, with various extensions and applications, North American actuarial journal, 4, 80-93, (2000) · Zbl 1083.62535
[17] Lee, R.D.; Carter, L.R., Modeling and forecasting U.S. mortality, Journal of the American statistical association, 87, 659-675, (1992) · Zbl 1351.62186
[18] Lin, Y.; Cox, S.H., Securitization of mortality risks in life annuities, Journal of risk and insurance, 72, 227-252, (2005)
[19] O’Keeffe, P.J.L.; Desai, A.J.; Foroughi, K.; Hibbett, G.J.; Maxwell, A.F.; Sharp, A.C.; Taverner, N.H.; Ward, M.B.; Willis, F.J.P., Current developments in embedded value reporting, British actuarial journal, 11, 407-496, (2005)
[20] Olivieri, A., Uncertainty in mortality projections: an actuarial perspective, Insurance: mathematics & economics, 29, 231-245, (2001) · Zbl 0989.62058
[21] Olivieri, A., 2005. Designing longevity risk transfers: The point of view of the cedant. Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari LXVIII, pp. 1-35. Reprinted on: ICFAI Journal of Financial Risk Management Issue March 2007
[22] Olivieri, A.; Pitacco, E., Solvency requirements for pension annuities, Journal of pension economics and finance, 2, 127-157, (2003)
[23] Olivieri, A., Pitacco, E., 2005. La valutazione nelle assicurazioni vita. Profili attuariali. Milano: EGEA; Also as: Evaluation en Assurance-Vie. Approches actuarielles. Paris: Pearson (in press)
[24] Pemberton, J.; Allen, I.; Brown, D.; Hardwick, S.; Shah, N.; Stevens, A.; Wilson, C., Classifying DCF models to explicate EVA, (2000), The Staple Inn Actuarial Society London
[25] Renshaw, A.E.; Haberman, S., Lee – carter mortality forecasting with age-specific enhancement, Insurance: mathematics & economics, 33, 255-272, (2003) · Zbl 1103.91371
[26] Renshaw, A.E.; Haberman, S., A cohort-based extension to the lee – carter model for mortality reduction factors, Insurance: mathematics & economics, 38, 556-570, (2006) · Zbl 1168.91418
[27] Sheldon, T.J.; Smith, A.D., Market consistent valuation of life assurance business, British actuarial journal, 10, 543-626, (2004)
[28] Sherris, M., On the risk adjusted discount rate for determining life office appraisal values, Journal of the institute of actuaries, 114, 581-589, (1987)
[29] Tillinghast-Towers Perrins, Market-consistent embedded value, (2004)
[30] Tillinghast-Towers Perrins, Market-consistent embedded value. dispelling the myths, (2005)
[31] Turner, S., Actuarial appraisal valuations of life insurance companies, Transactions of the society of actuaries, 30, 139-167, (1978)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.