zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Development of group setup strategies for makespan minimisation in PCB assembly. (English) Zbl 1128.90482
Summary: Balancing setup effort and actual production time is an important issue in medium-variety, medium-volume printed circuit board (PCB) assembly. By grouping batches of similar PCB types to be processed with a common machine setup, the total time required for setting up the component feeders in the magazine of the placement machine can be reduced. On the other hand, the assembly times per PCB increase, since it is no longer possible to optimise the feeder locations in the magazine for each PCB type individually. In order to balance the savings in setup time and the increase in assembly time and to minimise the global makespan, we propose efficient grouping procedures which include machine-specific algorithms for fine-tuning the machine operations for a group of PCBs. Hence, the actual placement times are reflected much more accurately, compared with conventional grouping procedures which merely analyse the component similarity between pairs of PCBs. Two different agglomerative clustering techniques are proposed. One is based on average linkage clustering, the other on a novel hierarchical clustering approach using an inclusion tree representation of the PCB types. Both take the limited capacity of the component magazine into account. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in an extensive numerical investigation of a single-gantry collect-and-place machine equipped with a rotary placement head and an interchangeable feeder trolley. Compared to conventional methodologies, the proposed group setup strategies reduce the global makespan for a given number of batches significantly.

90B30 Production models
Full Text: DOI
[1] DOI: 10.1080/00207549608904923 · Zbl 0926.90024
[2] Crama Y, Working Paper (1999)
[3] DOI: 10.1080/002075497195164 · Zbl 0940.90548
[4] DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00119-9
[5] DOI: 10.1080/00207540050205064
[6] Grunow M, Optimierung von Bestückungsprozessen in der Elektronikmontage (in German) (2000)
[7] DOI: 10.1080/0020754021000042968 · Zbl 1063.90032
[8] DOI: 10.1007/BF01545517 · Zbl 0889.90078
[9] DOI: 10.1080/0951192050064870
[10] DOI: 10.1023/B:FLEX.0000044838.12637.0e · Zbl 1138.90382
[11] DOI: 10.1080/00207540110072984 · Zbl 1175.90143
[12] DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1956-0078686-7 · Zbl 0070.18404
[13] DOI: 10.1142/S0960313102000400
[14] DOI: 10.1007/BF00170019
[15] DOI: 10.1080/00207549108948017
[16] DOI: 10.1080/00207549608904947 · Zbl 0947.90532
[17] Raz T, Int. J. Indust. Eng. 1 pp 57– (1994)
[18] DOI: 10.1080/00207549308956779
[19] DOI: 10.1080/00207549208942937
[20] Smed J, Automation pp 179– (1999)
[21] DOI: 10.1023/A:1023900922864
[22] DOI: 10.1080/00207540412331299639 · Zbl 1068.90580
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.