zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Realistically coupled neural mass models can generate EEG rhythms. (English) Zbl 1122.92015
Summary: We study the generation of EEG rhythms by means of realistically coupled neural mass models. Previous neural mass models were used to model cortical voxels and the thalamus. Interactions between voxels of the same and other cortical areas and with the thalamus were taken into account. Voxels within the same cortical area were coupled (short-range connections) with both excitatory and inhibitory connections, while coupling between areas (long-range connections) was considered to be excitatory only. Short-range connection strengths were modeled by using a connectivity function depending on the distance between voxels. Coupling strength parameters between areas were defined from empirical anatomical data employing the information obtained from probabilistic paths, which were tracked by water diffusion imagine techniques and used to quantify white matter tracts in the brain.
Each cortical voxel was then described by a set of 16 random differential equations, while the thalamus was described by a set of 12 random differential equations. Thus, for analyzing the neuronal dynamics emerging from the interactions of several areas, a large system of differential equations needs to be solved. The sparseness of the estimated anatomical connectivity matrix reduces the number of connection parameters substantially, making the solution of this system faster. Simulations of human brain rhythms were carried out in order to test the model. Physiologically plausible results were obtained based on this anatomically constrained neural mass model.

92C20 Neural biology
92C55 Biomedical imaging and signal processing
34F05 Ordinary differential equations and systems with randomness
Full Text: DOI
[1] DOI: 10.1038/nn1075
[2] DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00309-0
[3] DOI: 10.1007/s10543-005-2645-9 · Zbl 1081.65013
[4] DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90124-4
[5] DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199403000-00005
[6] DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144152
[7] DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7
[8] DOI: 10.1038/280120a0
[9] DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60022-9
[10] DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200212200-00022
[11] DOI: 10.1023/A:1021995918864 · Zbl 0998.65010
[12] DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00142-3
[13] DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.413
[14] DOI: 10.1001/archneur.55.2.193
[15] Jansen B. H., Methods of Information in Medicine 40 pp 338– (2001)
[16] DOI: 10.1007/BF00199471 · Zbl 0827.92010
[17] DOI: 10.1007/BF00224863
[18] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.960
[19] DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2789(96)00166-2 · Zbl 0885.92012
[20] DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1052
[21] DOI: 10.1007/BF00270757
[22] DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015347
[23] DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.038
[24] DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1995.1012
[25] DOI: 10.1002/cne.903050303
[26] DOI: 10.1093/brain/120.4.701
[27] DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2002.1009386
[28] DOI: 10.1073/pnas.82.13.4531
[29] DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(85)90942-3
[30] Plonsey R., IEEE Trans. BioMedical Electronics 10 pp 9– (1963)
[31] DOI: 10.1126/science.279.5355.1351
[32] DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.69.4.528
[33] DOI: 10.1109/TBME.1969.4502598
[34] DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90063-2
[35] DOI: 10.1080/07362999808809559 · Zbl 0912.60078
[36] DOI: 10.1145/285861.285868 · Zbl 0917.65063
[37] DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00236-2
[38] DOI: 10.1007/s004220050572 · Zbl 0960.92016
[39] DOI: 10.1007/BF02463252 · Zbl 0478.92005
[40] DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.12.5577
[41] DOI: 10.1007/s004220000160
[42] DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(72)86068-5
[43] DOI: 10.1007/BF00337367 · Zbl 0391.92004
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.