# zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Optimized weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes for linear waves with discontinuity. (English) Zbl 1106.76412
Summary: ENO (essentially nonoscillatory) and weighted ENO (WENO) schemes were designed for high resolution of discontinuities, such as shock waves, while optimized schemes such as the DRP (dispersion-relation-preserving) schemes were optimized for short waves (with respect to the grid spacing $$\Delta x$$, e.g., waves that are $$6-8\Delta x$$ in wavelength) in the wavenumber space. In this paper, we seek to unite the advantages of WENO and optimized schemes through the development of Optimized WENO (OWENO) schemes to tackle shock/broadband acoustic wave interactions and small-scale flow turbulences relative to the grid spacing. OWENO schemes are optimized in two levels. In the first level, optimized schemes are constructed for all candidate stencils by minimizing the error in the wavenumber space. In the second level, these optimized schemes are convexly combined using weights constructed to achieve not only higher order of accuracy but also high resolution for short waves. In addition, a new definition of smoothness indicators is presented for the OWENO schemes. These smoothness indicators are shown to have better resolution for short waves. A third-order OWENO scheme and a seventh-order WENO scheme are compared against each other for performance on the scalar model equation. It has been shown that the OWENO scheme indeed gives much better results in resolving short waves than the WENO scheme while yielding nonoscillatory solutions for discontinuities. Finally the OWENO scheme is extended to the linearized Euler equations to solve two computational aeroacoustics (CAA) benchmark problems to demonstrate its capability.

##### MSC:
 76M20 Finite difference methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics
Full Text:
##### References:
 [1] Balsara, D.S.; Shu, C.-W., Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high-order accuracy, J. comput. phys., 160, 405, (2000) · Zbl 0961.65078 [2] Casper, J.; Atkins, H.L., A finite volume high-order ENO scheme for two-dimensional hyperbolic systems, J. comput. phys., 106, 62, (1993) · Zbl 0774.65066 [3] Fedkiw, R.P.; Merriman, B.; Osher, S., Simplified discretization of systems of hyperbolic conservation laws containing advection equations, J. comput. phys., 157, 302, (2000) · Zbl 0959.76059 [4] Gaitonde, D.; Shang, J.S., Optimized compact-difference-based finite volume schemes for linear wave phenomena, J. comput. phys., 138, 617, (1997) · Zbl 0898.65055 [5] Harten, A., High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. comput. phys., 49, 357, (1983) · Zbl 0565.65050 [6] Harten, A.; Engquist, B.; Osher, S.; Chakravarthy, S., Uniformly high order essentially non-oscillatory schemes III, J. comput. phys., 71, 231, (1987) · Zbl 0652.65067 [7] R. Hixon, Evaluation of a high-accuracy MacCormack-type scheme using benchmark problems, NASA Contractor Report 202324, ICOMP-97-03, 1997. [8] A. Jameson, W. Schmidt, and, E. Turkel, Numerical solutions of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping, Technical Paper 81-1259, AIAA Press, Washington, DC, 1981. [9] Jiang, G.; Shu, C.-W., Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, J. comput. phys., 126, 202, (1996) · Zbl 0877.65065 [10] C. Kim, P. L. Roe, and, J. P. Thomas, Accurate schemes for advection and aeroacoustics, Technical Paper 97-2091, AIAA Press, Washington, DC, 1997. [11] Lele, S.K., Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution, J. comput. phys., 103, 16, (1992) · Zbl 0759.65006 [12] Lin, S.Y.; Chin, Y.S., Comparison of higher resolution Euler schemes for aeroacoustics computations, Aiaa j., 33, 237, (1995) [13] Lin, S.Y.; Hu, J.J., Parameter study of weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for computational aeroacoustics, Aiaa j., 39, 371, (2001) [14] Liu, X.D.; Osher, S.; Chan, T., Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes, J. comput. phys., 115, 200, (1994) · Zbl 0811.65076 [15] Liu, Y., Fourier analysis of numerical algorithms for the Maxwell equations, J. comput. phys., 124, 396, (1996) · Zbl 0858.65125 [16] Lockard, D.P.; Brentner, K.S.; Atkins, H.L., High-accuracy algorithms for computational aeroacoustics, Aiaa j., 33, 246, (1995) · Zbl 0825.76490 [17] Osher, S.; Chakravarthy, S., Upwind schemes and boundary conditions with applications to Euler equation in general geometries, J. comput. phys., 50, 447, (1983) · Zbl 0518.76060 [18] Roe, P.L., Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes, J. comput. phys., 43, 357, (1981) · Zbl 0474.65066 [19] L. N. Sankar, N. N. Reddy, and, N. Hariharan, A third order upwind scheme for aeroacoustic application, Technical Paper 93-0149, AIAA Press, Washington, DC, 1993. [20] Shu, C.-W., Total-variation-diminishing time discretizations, SIAM J. sci. stat. comput., 9, 1073, (1988) · Zbl 0662.65081 [21] C.-W. Shu, Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, in Advanced Numerical Approximation of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations, B. Cockburn, C. Johnson, C.-W. Shu, and E. Tadmor Edited by A. Quarteroni, Lecture Notes in Mathematics Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York, 1998, Vol. 1697, pp. 325-432. · Zbl 0927.65111 [22] Tam, C.K.W., Computational aeroacoustics: issues and methods, Aiaa j., 33, 1788, (1995) · Zbl 0856.76080 [23] Tam, C.K.W.; Webb, J.C., Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics, J. comput. phys., 107, 262, (1993) · Zbl 0790.76057 [24] C. K. W. Tam, L. N. Sankar, and, D. L. Huff, Third Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA) Workshop on Benchmark Problems, Cleveland, Ohio, November 1999. [25] van Leer, B., Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second order sequel to Godunov’s method, J. comput. phys., 32, 101, (1979) · Zbl 1364.65223 [26] V. G. Weirs, and, G. V. Candler, Optimization of weighted ENO schemes for DNS of compressible turbulence, Technical Paper 97-1940, AIAA Press, Washington, DC, 1997. [27] Zhuang, M.; Chen, R.F., Optimized upwind dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational aeroacoustics, Aiaa j., 36, 2146, (1998) [28] M. Zhuang, and, R. F. Chen, Applications of the optimized upwind dispersion relation preserving schemes for multi-dimensional acoustic problems. Technical Paper 98-2367, AIAA Press, Washington, DC, 1998. [29] D. W. Zingg, A review of high-order and optimized finite-difference methods for simulating linear wave phenomena, Technical Paper 97-2088, AIAA Press, Washington, DC, 1997.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.