×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Optimal strategies in 2-stage sampling. (English) Zbl 1105.62011
Summary: In many survey situations simple random sampling of units and estimation of a total of interest by the expansion estimator are attractive methods, at least at first sight. Considering cost aspects suggests rather to use multiple stage sampling which, in general, is cheaper, but less effective. The design effect is an adequate criterion of the decrease of efficiency. We discuss this criterion for clusters (primary units) of equal size and derive exact conditions for a decrease of efficiency. The equality condition for cluster sizes seems not to be very restrictive, because in many cases one will be interested in clusters of approximately the same size, or, if sizes differ essentially, the clusters are partitioned into strata according to their sizes and the procedures for different strata are independent, each dealing with clusters of equal size or nearly so. In the context considered the use of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator is quite general. We examine a class of estimators with the Horvitz-Thompson estimator and a straight forward modification of it as special elements. As for the design effect all elements of the class are very similar, as for other aspects such as admissibility there are remarkable differences.
MSC:
62D05 Sampling theory, sample surveys
Software:
SDaA
PDF BibTeX Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Fritschi P, Meyer R, Schweizer W (1976) Ein neuer Stichprobenplan für ein gesamtschweizerisches Sample. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 2:149–158
[2] Gabler S (1990) Minimax solutions in sampling from finite populations. Lecture Notes in Statistics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York · Zbl 0708.62010
[3] Gabler S, Häder S, Lahiri P (1999) A model based justification of Kish’s formula for design effects for weighting and clustering. Surv Methodol 25:105–106
[4] Gabler S, Häder S, Lynn P (2003) Refining the concept and measurement of design effects. ISI-2003 Berlin, 18–20 August 2003
[5] Häder S, Gabler S, Laaksonen S, Lynn P (2003) The sample. Chapter 2 in ESS 2002/2003: Technical Report. http://www.europeansocialsurvey.com
[6] Kish L (1965) Survey sampling. Wiley, New York · Zbl 0151.23403
[7] Kish L (1995) Methods for design effects. J Official Stat 11:55–77
[8] Lê TN, Verma VK (1997) Demographic and health surveys. Analytical reports No 3: an analysis of sample designs and sampling errors of the demographic and health surveys. Macro International Inc, Calverton, Maryland
[9] Lehtonen R, Pahkinen EJ (1996) Practical methods for design and analysis of complex surveys revised edition. Wiley, New York
[10] Lohr SL (1999) Sampling: design and analysis. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove · Zbl 0967.62005
[11] Lynn P, Häder S, Gabler S, Laaksonen S (2004) Methods for achieving equivalence of samples in cross-national surveys: the European social survey experience. ISER Working paper 2004–09
[12] Marshall AW, Olkin I (1979) Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. Academic, Orlando · Zbl 0437.26007
[13] Park I, Lee H (2004) Design effects for the weighted mean and total estimators under complex survey sampling. Surv Methodol 30:183–193
[14] Skinner CJ (1986) Design effects of two-stage sampling. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 48:89–99 · Zbl 0606.62005
[15] Skinner CJ, Holt D, Smith TMF (eds) (1989) Analysis of complex surveys. Wiley, New York · Zbl 0701.62018
[16] Stenger H (1979) A minimax approach to randomization and estimation in survey sampling. Ann Stat 7:395–399 · Zbl 0399.62007
[17] Stenger H, Gabler S (1981) On the completeness of the class of fixed size sampling strategies. Ann Stat 9:229–232 · Zbl 0453.62010
[18] Stenger H, Gabler S, Schmidt J (2002) Survey sampling: a linear game.Stat Decis 20:279–295 · Zbl 1002.62013
[19] Verma VK (1982) The estimation and presentation of sampling errors. WFS Technical Bulletins No 11. International Statistical Institute, The Hague
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.