zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Time continuity in cohesive finite element modeling. (English) Zbl 1032.74676
Summary: We introduce the notion of time continuity for the analysis of cohesive zone interface finite element models. We focus on ‘initially rigid’ models in which an interface is inactive until the traction across it reaches a critical level. We argue that methods in this class are time discontinuous, unless special provision is made for the opposite. Time discontinuity leads to pitfalls in numerical implementations: oscillatory behavior, non-convergence in time and dependence on nonphysical regularization parameters. These problems arise at least partly from the attempt to extend uniaxial traction-displacement relationships to multiaxial loading. We also argue that any formulation of a time-continuous functional traction-displacement cohesive model entails encoding the value of the traction components at incipient softening into the model. We exhibit an example of such a model. Most of our numerical experiments concern explicit dynamics.
Reviewer: Reviewer (Berlin)

74S05 Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics
74R99 Fracture and damage
Full Text: DOI
[1] Dugdale, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 8 pp 1001– (1960)
[2] Barenblatt, Advances in Applied Mechanics 7 pp 551– (1962) · doi:10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2
[3] Ortiz, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 44 pp 1267– (1999)
[4] Costanzo, International Journal of Engineering Science 36 pp 1763– (1998)
[5] Tvergaard, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 41 pp 1191– (1993)
[6] Evans, Acta Metallurgica 37 pp 909– (1989)
[7] Alfano, International Journal for Numerical Method in Engineering 50 pp 1701– (2001)
[8] A cohesive zone model for a crack lying along a bi-material interface. In vol. 2 AMD-185. ASME: New York, 1994; 37-55.
[9] Camacho, International Journal of Solids and Structures 33 pp 2899– (1996)
[10] Xu, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 42 pp 1397– (1994)
[11] Moës, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 69 pp 813– (2002)
[12] Moës, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 46 pp 131– (1999)
[13] Ingraffea, Journal of the Structural Division 110 pp 871– (1984)
[14] Simulation of arbitrary, cohesive crack propagation. In Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures, (ed.). Elsevier Applied Science: New York, 1992; 339-350.
[15] Needleman, Journal of Applied Mechanics 54 pp 525– (1987)
[16] Physics-based modeling of brittle fracture: cohesive formulations and the application of meshfree methods. Technical Report SAND2001-8099, Sandia National Laboratories, December 2000.
[17] Hohberg, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 19 pp 773– (1990)
[18] Schellekens, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 36 pp 43– (1993)
[19] Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I (2nd Edn). Springer: Berlin, 1993.
[20] Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Birkhäuser: Basel, 1992. · Zbl 0847.65053 · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8629-1
[21] Geubelle, Composites Part B 29B pp 589– (1998)
[22] Needleman, Computational Mechanics 19 pp 463– (1997)
[23] Roy, International Journal of Fracture 110 pp 21– (2001)
[24] Tvergaard, Materials Science and Engineering 125 pp 203– (1990)
[25] Falk, Journal of Physique IV 11 pp 43– (2001) · doi:10.1051/jp4:2001506
[26] Personal communication, 2002.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.